Xpanded Dayshow - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +--- Forum: So Spoilt TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=278) +--- Thread: Xpanded Dayshow - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=50532) |
RE: Jenna Nova - Ultramantis Black - 28-01-2021 16:23 (28-01-2021 14:09 )Doddle Wrote:(25-01-2021 09:56 )Ultramantis Black Wrote: Boomer addressed this in the Darla Gunn thread and he's probably correct, the issue is that XP only use six girls throughout the day (seven for a weekend).This is totally the sort of topic stuff that "General Discussion" is born to do No need to be a cunt about things with your smarmy laughing emoji. Oh, and being laughed at by someone with 20,000 posts on a wanking forum! The irony. Sorry for trying to promote some discussion. Must do better! RE: Jenna Nova - Boomerangutangangbang - 28-01-2021 19:53 (28-01-2021 14:09 )Doddle Wrote:(25-01-2021 09:56 )Ultramantis Black Wrote: Boomer addressed this in the Darla Gunn thread and he's probably correct, the issue is that XP only use six girls throughout the day (seven for a weekend).This is totally the sort of topic stuff that "General Discussion" is born to do I wouldn't discourage debate, regardless of whether it's in the appropriate thread or not. It is the purpose of a Forum. It's an organic thing, one post triggers another, & so on. So much more worthy than stand-alone statements. If necessary, a moderator would no doubt move posts if they see fit. RE: Jenna Nova - Doddle - 28-01-2021 22:06 (28-01-2021 16:23 )Ultramantis Black Wrote: Oh, and being laughed at by someone with 20,000 posts on a wanking forum! The irony.You've been here longer than I have, so that's no excuse. Quote:Sorry for trying to promote some discussion.Does the title "General Discussion" not ring any bells then? Rather than using a babe's thread to ramble on about things other than that babe? Seems insulting to her really. Oh well, never mind, worse things happen at sea I guess... RE: Jenna Nova - Boomerangutangangbang - 28-01-2021 22:33 (28-01-2021 22:06 )Doddle Wrote:(28-01-2021 16:23 )Ultramantis Black Wrote: Oh, and being laughed at by someone with 20,000 posts on a wanking forum! The irony.You've been here longer than I have, so that's no excuse.Quote:Sorry for trying to promote some discussion.Does the title "General Discussion" not ring any bells then? It was 4 posts that followed a logical discussion. The initial post provoked a response, & so on. No rambling. In no way is this insulting to Jenna Nova, it's concerning a channel she works for. Rambling on, pot kettle. RE: Jenna Nova - Doddle - 29-01-2021 08:19 Well, you probably already put it best: (28-01-2021 19:53 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: If necessary, a moderator would no doubt move posts if they see fit. RE: Jenna Nova - Boomerangutangangbang - 29-01-2021 10:03 (29-01-2021 08:19 )Doddle Wrote: Well, you probably already put it best:(28-01-2021 19:53 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: If necessary, a moderator would no doubt move posts if they see fit. Yes I did. & if it wasn't for you being pedantic in the first place this would be have been over with long ago. RE: Xpanded Dayshow - General Chat & Discussion - Doddle - 29-01-2021 13:40 A world without pedantry would be like a broken pencil. I don't pretend to work out the numbers game with Xpanded, even with a smaller apparent roster and channels to work with, there doesn't seem a direct rhyme or reason to it. 2 x daytime slots a day x 1 or 2 babes per slot x some who don't do mornings or don't do afternoons x some who do nights as well, and so on. RE: Xpanded Dayshow - General Chat & Discussion - Boomerangutangangbang - 29-01-2021 14:27 (29-01-2021 13:40 )Doddle Wrote: A world without pedantry would be like a broken pencil. Oh well, better late than never, we got there (here) in the end. Would've been better without the unpleasantness along the way. A little work on your diplomacy wouldn't go amiss. Not sure that pedantry & a broken pencil is the most accurate analogy. RE: Xpanded Dayshow - General Chat & Discussion - Doddle - 29-01-2021 21:39 I meant no offence in the first place - I had no idea some people hit the roof in the face of smilies. RE: Xpanded Dayshow - General Chat & Discussion - AndyJames - 17-02-2021 14:23 Is it just me, or have xpanded in the past week or so fallen back heavily on established performers and given less opportunities to the new girls? I always assumed they were entirely competition based and appearances depended solely on the number of calls generated, but a short while ago they did try and introduce a few fresh faces who since seem to have disappeared. Maybe as a result there was a significant dip in their call volumes and corresponding revenue. |