+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bang Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Thread: Bangbabes - Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=7494)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - stueyboy - 02-12-2009 00:15
Hi Amanda!
Thanks for updating us with your message, it's much appreciated. It will be interesting to see what the developments are in future.
Amanda, one thing which seems to have changed already is the camerawork on BBs - after 9.00pm the cameras seem to move around a lot, and hardly ever stay still.
For myself, after a while it starts to distract you from the girls' performance, 'cos you start to anticipate where the camera is going to move to next, rather than just enjoying the Show.
One thing with lots of close ups and camera motion is it means the girl's face is often off screen - when you cannot see their face you lose the "eye contact" with them (really important as a caller) - when you can't see the look on their face it's less sexy.
Even when the cameras are still for a few moments, you still get the sensation that at any second they are going to start moving again. I think it's a shame because the cameras are now virtually the same as Elite TV, and surely you wouldn't want to copy a rival channel??
Amanda, sorry to bother you with this issue, but it would be great if you or anybody could explain why the cameras are now like this.
Thank you
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - tsurugi - 02-12-2009 00:16
Quote: i had some unfortunate news on the way to work tonightWhat that jemma is in birmingham partying without you
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Ultramantis Black - 02-12-2009 15:25
(01-12-2009 16:39 )tsurugi Wrote:(01-12-2009 16:08 )Rammyrascal Wrote: im sure bangbabes will be back to being filthy especially tonight with amanda being back on. also if amanda is to be belived a new bangbabe is joining her tonight and to quote amanda "one of the best in the business"
bangbabes and other channels have a spell where they are filthy and then go tame and the cycle repeats
Amanda seems to say a lot of things on her blog including hinting at doing boy/girl. You think she would have learnt to shut her mouth after the "I am staying at BS because i am loyal to the company and BS is the number one show" post only to join Bangbabes a few days later.
So she is hinting at another Babestation reject joining her on BB then ?considering all the flack jamie got for employing ex BB girls on elite would this not be fair to call BB bangstation or something along those lines
Big blow losing the "Golden Goose" Lolly Badcock to a rival channel but if amanda and jemma are as popular as their ego's like to think am sure she will not be missed
Excellent post, and I dont believe the wink was necessary.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - mr mystery - 02-12-2009 16:48
(02-12-2009 00:15 )Golgathor Wrote:(02-12-2009 00:05 )babefinder Wrote: how do u prove A rendell is really amanda
That is a very good question, and one I should have asked myself before blindly repping her. Afterall, anyone could view her blog, make a new id, and post away. Now here's a noodle baker - she posted on here at 22:40, but hasn't been on her blog since nineish when she let us know what was happening. Not only that, but the line 'do not always have access to the internet' is a falsehood - she blogged on Saturday when in Manchester, on Monday while on her way home, tonight when obviously heading home, and generally posts quite a bit when she's free. Curious...
Of course, we could be very wrong and it is Amanda, in which case: Sorry Amanda! Forgive me?
Amanda has just posted on her web site blog that it was her on this forum last night and has left Golgathor a message
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - tsurugi - 02-12-2009 16:56
So his fanboyism payed off then
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - TheWatcher - 02-12-2009 17:12
Just read Amanda's blog entry, made just over an hour ago.
Sounds like she might not be posting on the forum again.
Can't say I blame her.
quote
let all the disrespectful twats argue amongst themselves on the forum…. im not gona wastemy time on there anymore as theres no point… its all sillyness
end quote
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Rammyrascal - 02-12-2009 17:29
i dont blame amanda either. i think she has had a lot of unfair and sometimes nasty comments about her which i think have been undeserved
hope whatever it is amanda which caused you to miss last night isnt too bad and your back on bangbabes on sat
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - tsurugi - 02-12-2009 17:44
No doubt she will be back when she has something to sell or interest in her has faded.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Bluearmy71 - 02-12-2009 17:48
Oh please, all opinions on her are formed from her own actions, its a proven fact that she doesn't give a fuck about her fans and indeed lets them down worse than anyone deserves, she put herself in the spotlight therefore is open to both positivity and negativity comment wise, you have to be grown up and take the good with the bad and not throw a fit cuz not everyone is fooled by the bullshit she writes, actions speak louder than words!
Everyone is accountable for how they act, her actions have led to negative opinions from co-workers and some fans, so the only one to blame is Amanda!
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Rammyrascal - 02-12-2009 17:51
i can accept a lot of what amanda says is exagerated but still doesnt warrant some of the comments she has had