+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - broncobilly10 - 21-06-2012 12:58
The viewers watch, quite a few call the shows buy the videos text the show and all that. It is not up to the viewers to make sure babe show bosses still have a business to run if you think its not down the channels its only because you work for them.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - munch1917 - 21-06-2012 15:02
(21-06-2012 12:58 )Broncobilly Wrote: ...
It is not up to the viewers to make sure babe show bosses still have a business to run
...
(21-06-2012 12:58 )Broncobilly Wrote: The viewers watch, quite a few call the shows buy the videos text the show and all that
...
If people are watching, calling, texting etc, then there is still a business there, so why do the channels need to take Ofcom on? If they have a sustainable business within the rules and restrictions laid down why should they risk a battle with the regulator? Sure they may get more business with harder content, but maybe not, times are hard, it's a recession, maybe it would be no different. Thing is, we simply don't know the economic situation the channels are in, we don't know if revenues have fallen as the shows have become tamer, and if it has, by how much, and is it as a result of the tamer shows or just the wider economic situation.
If the shows can still make profit in these tamer times, then where is the incentive for anyone to challenge Ofcom, surely better to play by the rules, avoid fines, and carry on making money.
I'd guess things can't be that tough for the channels, as they are all still in business, and not only that, but the likes of Eurotic have seen fit to move into the UK market and abide by Ofcom restrictions.
I'd gladly see a return to harder shows, proper 241's etc, but if the channels are making money as is, then they are unlikely to see a need to challenge things. If their business does start really struggling, maybe then they will make a stand, but that doesn't seem to be the case right now.
(21-06-2012 12:58 )Broncobilly Wrote: ...
if you think its not down the channels its only because you work for them.
Yeah, anyone who disagrees with your world view works for the channels ... or Ofcom ... or both ... or maybe they are nazis
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 21-06-2012 15:05
(21-06-2012 15:02 )munch1917 Wrote:(21-06-2012 12:58 )Broncobilly Wrote: ...
It is not up to the viewers to make sure babe show bosses still have a business to run
...
(21-06-2012 12:58 )Broncobilly Wrote: The viewers watch, quite a few call the shows buy the videos text the show and all that
...
If people are watching, calling, texting etc, then there is still a business there, so why do the channels need to take Ofcom on? If they have a sustainable business within the rules and restrictions laid down why should they risk a battle with the regulator? Sure they may get more business with harder content, but maybe not, times are hard, it's a recession, maybe it would be no different. Thing is, we simply don't know the economic situation the channels are in, we don't know if revenues have fallen as the shows have become tamer, and if it has, by how much, and is it as a result of the tamer shows or just the wider economic situation.
If the shows can still make profit in these tamer times, then where is the incentive for anyone to challenge Ofcom, surely better to play by the rules, avoid fines, and carry on making money.
I'd guess things can't be that tough for the channels, as they are all still in business, and not only that, but the likes of Eurotic have seen fit to move into the UK market and abide by Ofcom restrictions.
I'd gladly see a return to harder shows, proper 241's etc, but if the channels are making money as is, then they are unlikely to see a need to challenge things. If their business does start really struggling, maybe then they will make a stand, but that doesn't seem to be the case right now.
(21-06-2012 12:58 )Broncobilly Wrote: ...
if you think its not down the channels its only because you work for them.
Yeah, anyone who disagrees with your world view works for the channels ... or Ofcom ... or both ... or maybe they are nazis
As much as want less censored/uncensored shows, I agree with munch. If business is going well enough, which it seems to be, regardless of lack of calls at times, they have no incentive to challenge Ofcon.
I can't say I disagree with them either.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 21-06-2012 18:51
Rammy Posted this
if your this hostile towards the babeshows why do you effin keep watching them as for why jamie hasnt challenged the babeshows he's said why, its not worth the time effort, money and hassle to challenge ofcom (this is probably the same for the other channels). so everyone here who wants the babechannels to challenge ofcom will have to put their money where their mouth is and challenge ofcom themselves regarding the babeshows
as for the babeshows throwing out the rulebook and doing shows in a blaze of glory, that wont happen as the babeshows will get fined etc and ultimately get taken off air and they wont risk that. as blackjaques has said, ofcom wont be relaxing the rules for the shows anytime soon. so the babeshows are going to be like how they are at the moment whether we like it or not
wouldnt surprise me that in a couple of years all the babeshows go online to avoid ofcom's rules
Well fair point Rammy if it was consistent with your views but it ain't, one minute you're all up for ridding the world of ofcom and censorship aswell as apparently supporting the petition, however I've noticed recently you've dropped it from your signature.
Make your mind up which side of the fence you are sitting on here, you rave on about Elite all the time like it was the greatest show on earth, recently you came out with a ridiculas statement by saying that Elite trounced all the rest of the channels last week when in actual fact it was as shit as it's ever been.
One thing I will give credit to Elite for is it probably has the best looking models out of all the channels but that don't mean jack shit for the product on show, it's a bit of eye candy, but it's hardly what you'd call wank material, let's not fool ourselves here, that's really exactly why the watch the babe shows each night, I mean it's hardly for the plot now is it
Also the babe channel rules are never going to relax either unless somebody starts to kick up fuck about it so Jamie's stance on it with regard to Elite doesn't hold any water other than showing a bit of honesty like most will continue to do fuck all about it.
When you say we all have to remain patient, the very meaning of the word here means that the reason we might do so is for the greater knowledge that changes will not be far away, don't kid yourself. Unless ofcom are challenged the word patience isn't even a word when using it for the babe channels.
I stand by my initial post, rip the fucking rule book up and burn it whether ofcom like it or not.
Patience gets you nowhere, actions speak louder. If you are against fascist ofcom then you have to come out fighting and take a few gambles and risks.
Sure ofcom might pull the bloody lot of them if they suddenly air stronger material but on the other hand they might just cave in.
All the babe channel execs need to get together, arrange a meeting and put all their resources into a courtroom battle against these bastards if it all backfires badly.
But sitting on your arse doing fuck all ain't going to get you any positive results.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 21-06-2012 21:01
Right that's it enough is enough
Can someone please tell me how much more F**KIN shit we can take from these Cunts(Ofcom) These overpaid knobheads have slowly but surely destroyed are babe Channels over the years!! and for what? I cannot believe in the modern 21st century that are freedoms are Demorcratic rights are being destroyed by a so called regulator!! I am so angry that these people who couldn't regulate bath water sit in there million pound offices overlooking the River Thames laughing at not only the babe channels but us as well, knowing that for the moment no one can touch them. THE BIGGER THEY ARE THE HARDER THEY FALL
If the government are powerless to do anything, and the Babe channels are digging there heads in the sand afraid to do anything, well the only ones which can do anything is us the public
POWER TO THE PEOPLE that's what I say If people can bring down governments why not us bring down these CUNTS!!! because I am sick of my rights being taken away from me, this has got to stop and we need to stop it now!!!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - oldboy1047 - 21-06-2012 21:09
(21-06-2012 21:01 )continental19 Wrote: Right that's it enough is enoughi agree any suggestions?
THE BIGGER THEY ARE THE HARDER THEY FALL
If the government are powerless to do anything, and the Babe channels are digging there heads in the sand afraid to do anything, well the only ones which can do anything is us the public
RE: Ofcom Discussion - sweetsugar007 - 21-06-2012 21:14
Why is everyone getting their knickers in a twist about this! Its not the fault of the channels they are on an unencrypted channel which anyone can watch and politically Ofcom have to be seen to protect those who should not be watchimg these channels. If I want something harder tubestation.com works fine on my big screen.
A collection of the channels getting together wont work either cause they are making money! We are still calling them so they have no compelling event at the moment to change.
I share the sadness of what used to be a couple of years but it wont change in this government and thats for sure. We still cant see full on fucking on the Adult Channel and TVX so the babechannels have no chance.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 21-06-2012 22:00
Well ofcourse I'm going to disagree with you on that one, what a load of shit ofcom having to be seen to protect the minors from the oh fuck wait a minute the vagina, the minge, the cunt, the wizards sleeve, how ever you wish to call it.
Yeah sure...........fair point, well done ofcom, what a contradiction but however we'll air Spencer Tunick's naked states on SKY ARTS on a Sunday afternoon instead then.
Meanwhile back at babe channels HQ, all is silent, despite the fact they are protected allready in the 900+ section.
No fuck that about us getting our knickers in a twist, I think we've every right to do so.
I say the channel execs should grow a set of balls, funny that the very thing we're not allowed to see is the way they are acting, like a bunch of pussys.
Did I say fuck ofcom oh yes I did but I'll say it again fuck ofcom.
Ofcom can go and get fucked.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - dan g 27 - 21-06-2012 22:05
(21-06-2012 22:00 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Well ofcourse I'm going to disagree with you on that one, what a load of shit ofcom having to be seen to protect the minors from the oh fuck wait a minute the vagina, the minge, the cunt, the wizards sleeve, how ever you wish to call it.The wizard's sleeve, ok that one is new to me
Yeah sure...........fair point, well done ofcom, what a contradiction but however we'll air Spencer Tunick's naked states on SKY ARTS on a Sunday afternoon instead then.
Meanwhile back at babe channels HQ, all is silent, despite the fact they are protected allready in the 900+ section.
No fuck that about us getting our knickers in a twist, I think we've every right to do so.
I say the channel execs should grow a set of balls, funny that the very thing we're not allowed to see is the way they are acting, like a bunch of pussys.
Did I say fuck ofcom oh yes I did but I'll say it again fuck ofcom.
Ofcom can go and get fucked.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 21-06-2012 22:25
At the end of the day is this not an adult show for an adult audience, if the answer is yes then we should see such an airing take place.
It's fucking embarrassing, will kids be watching this show as ofcom clearly think, fuck no
What if they were
Big fucking deal, they might learn something, infact the best way for a kid to learn about sex is by watching a porno, why you ask.Because that way he'll know to shoot his load over the womens tits rather than up the pussy, that way we'll have less teenage pregnancies
