+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - sweetsugar007 - 24-06-2012 18:44
Scottishbloke how can you say ilovemegan is talking shit when you say the majority of the population would be against censorship. How do you know this?What data is this based on?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 24-06-2012 19:09
Well for a start just look at the amount of complaints made to ofcom about the babe channels. We are talking about a handful at most, the very fact that ofcom are even investigating the channels based on a solitory complaint or even none at all speaks volumes, it's ofcom who are against this type of entertainment, most people out there like I said couldn't give a rat's arse what is shown the telly in the 900+ section
RE: Ofcom Discussion - blackjaques - 24-06-2012 20:16
(24-06-2012 18:44 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: Scottishbloke how can you say ilovemegan is talking shit when you say the majority of the population would be against censorship. How do you know this?What data is this based on?
Well, SB's data is probably more accurate than Ofcon's assertion that there are hordes of children watching the encrypted shows night after night.
Both are probably bollox, based on the prejudices of the owners of the opinions.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 24-06-2012 20:52
if you base the facts that a programme such as eastenders which has in the past received hundreds of complaints for one single episode and have not even been fined , and compare that the the babe channels and complaints it proves that they are victims of discrimination as far as punishment is concerned, i have never seen a pre warning statement from the bbc that theres is going to be violence homosexual and extra marital affairs on offer in a episode , even though its broadcast before the watershed, now how does a child associate with this to real life ? a damn lot more damaging to the young mind than for instance a nip slip on the daytime show on the babe channels , ofcom have made no secret that their enemy is the babe channels and its so blatantly obvious that they are willing to break even their own laws to punish them ,
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 24-06-2012 23:28
(23-06-2012 23:19 )sweetsugar007 Wrote: None of us support Ofcom but they appear to be a fact of life like the watershed. There is not enough of a groundswell of public opinion to reduce censorship on TV and no political party will commit suicide!
No party wants to be accused for arbitrary censorship ither like old East European or Arab governments either. Depends how it is phrased.
Quote:Those of us who have children are already concerned explicit information is already too available in the public domain and that domain is almost un-policeable so the 900's have no chance.
There is a world of difference between internet sites in Thailand and the 900s. The 900s have measures to protect children, and could improve it.
Ofcom recently slapped ITV (I think) because they showed an old Agatha Christie film, Death on the Nile, with a suicide scene in the afternoon. The film is PG and has been repeatedly shown before. Ofcom say the offending scene must be cut if shown when children might watch.
For what its worth, the ISPs wanted to ban Pirate Bay but wanted the legal figleaf of a court order to protect them in case customers or Pirate Bay sued them.
Most complaints come from a handful of people with an agenda who deliberately seek out explicit content. The general public do not want their favourite content censored.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - iloveMegan - 24-06-2012 23:29
(24-06-2012 18:06 )Scottishbloke Wrote: ilovemegan you're talking shit as per usual. A very poor contradiction of my post if you ask me, but as per usual you try to be a smart ass but only it's you that is made to look foolish in this instance, you really take everything as literal don't you
You are the one who made a foolish comment and I pointed it out, that's all. Could you perhaps quote some of my other posts where I'm "talking shit as per usual" so I'll know what to avoid in the future? Thanks
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 25-06-2012 17:47
Ofcom's latest broadcast bulletin is out today , issue number 208 and dated 25/06/2012 ,
Not 1 single babe channel is mentioned in this bulletin for being found in breach or for being currently under investigation , 3 separate babe channels have had complaints made about them to Ofcom .
Playboy TV Chat has had complaints made about them on these dates,
4/5/2012
5/5/2012
13/5/2012
21/5/2012
Get Lucky TV had a complaint made about them on this date
9/5/2012
Storm nights had a complaint made about them on these dates
4/5/2012
23/5/2012
And Storm days on this date
17/5/2012
Ofcom assessed all these complaints made against these babe channels and decided non of them was worth investigating
RE: Ofcom Discussion - fedup1 - 25-06-2012 18:52
(20-06-2012 19:13 )blackjaques Wrote:(19-06-2012 23:57 )Digital Dave Wrote: Reading the above nonsense makes you want to weep. I hope I live long enough to see these diktats about 'generally accepted standards' and 'widespread offence' trashed to smithereens in court. They make no sense whatsoever.
They do if your agenda is "no sex please, we're British".
It's the same old story. Britain has a history of restricting sexual material; real sex that is. Look how long it took to get full sex films to be legal when the vast majority of the rest of Europe happily accepted it as a normal part of human society.
The politicians' puppets at Ofcon are not going to relax their rules anytime soon.
Still does not explain why oftwats ba the vagina but allow the penis anytime,,that is pure sexism..
Still awaiting a reply from Graham Howell ,,it seems folk must now be going to him to complain about ofcom and so they fucking should ofcom just sweep complaints under the carpet..What do they do these 800 employees on a wage that would take me yerars to get..Sounds like they do just look out the window at the Thames.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - elroyticklestab - 25-06-2012 19:13
Lots of keen uphill skiers at Ofcom like to see bell ends on tv perhaps?? Ooohhh bite the pillow Norman!!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 25-06-2012 21:21
While we're on the subject of the Ofcom scum, can anyone tell what the state of play is concerning chief Tosser Ed Richards? is he still in the Ofcom hot seat, or has he finally made it to the BBC?
Thanks Guys
