Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 |
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 19-01-2014 15:29 Been reading through the 'Great night tonight on the babe channels' thread and have been somewhat surprised at the praise of last nights output. For me it was just another night of going through the motions. Same old outfits, same old performances in the same old unmodified sets. No creativity, no imagination, no spark. The body language and use of the sets is quite frankly dreadful across the board at the moment. And no I don't accept it is all the fault of OFCOM. The producers and channels and babes are perfectly capable of helping to generate much better entertainment than is being produced at the moment even bearing in mind the current rules. And before any babe reads this and starts blabbering on about just another forum member who never rings the shows........... WRONG!!. I have been a regular caller to many babes over time so dont spout out that old rubbish. There is very very little on nights that is tempting me to ring in 2014 so far. Give me something stimulating to watch and I might ring up . RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 19-01-2014 18:16 looks pretty dire for tonight i thought the girls that were on last night were ok wasnt a great night but there was some good things so you only ring when a girl is performing maybe a girl is waiting for a decent caller so they can start performing i do find that on a weekend the phones are full of lonely drunks who then abuse the girls not all of them but a certain number do RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 20-01-2014 02:18 (19-01-2014 18:16 )HannahsPet Wrote: so you only ring when a girl is performing maybe a girl is waiting for a decent caller so they can start performing If that is their attitude then imo that is rather unsatisfactory. It is not my obligation to make them perform. It is down to the babe to produce viewing worthy of the cost of the call imo. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 20-01-2014 10:00 (19-01-2014 14:43 )MARCCE Wrote:(17-01-2014 08:09 )Lotuseater Wrote: The shows are shockingly bad at the moment. Last night was atrocious, very poor line-up across the channels and and since new year I've noticed very cautious producers and inhibited girls. Lots of people find heavily tattooed women who have multiple piercings and "bowling ball boob jobs" (some heavily tattooed and pierced babes dont have boob jobs though) as you call it very very attractive. I myself find them very attractive and am a massive fan of the fuel girls and the suicide girls who are all heavily tattooed and have multiple piercings and some have boob jobs regarding the babeshows, these babes are clearly popular with people who are calling the babeshows these days and bringing in the calls, otherwise the channels would not have them on. would be boring if all the babes looked the same and the channels would lose a good amount of calls. regarding the babeshows themselves, whilst they are going through a flat, quiet spell at the moment, I think they are not as bad as some forum members think. im always finding something to watch and like every night RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - MARCCE - 20-01-2014 13:35 (20-01-2014 10:00 )Rammyrascal Wrote: Lots of people find heavily tattooed women who have multiple piercings and "bowling ball boob jobs" (some heavily tattooed and pierced babes dont have boob jobs though) as you call it very very attractive. I myself find them very attractive and am a massive fan of the fuel girls and the suicide girls who are all heavily tattooed and have multiple piercings and some have boob jobs I'm not arguing that some people find that attractive. What I am saying is that there are now far too many like that for people like me who find it completely unattractive. Would the channels lose a good amount of calls? Just about all of them have had to resort to various cut price offers to bring in calls in the first place these days. Whilst that may be down to any number of things the various channels infatuation with the "porn star" look may be one of those things. Not being funny but I can't remember having seen anything where you've ever criticised output on the channels. With all due respect the fact that you can always find something to watch isn't a glowing endorsement for them. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 20-01-2014 14:28 wouldn't say myself there is far too many heavily tattooed and pierced babes on the channels these days. off the top of my head as im typing this, babestation only has 1 babe Rebecca Crow that I would say is heavily tattooed and pierced, rlc for me only has 1 babe Ava Blue that I would say is heavily tattooed and pierced. S66 at the moment doesn't have any babes at the moment for me that I would say are heavily tattooed and pierced, storm has 1 babe nancy roxxx, that I would say is heavily tattooed and pierced and xxxpanded don't for me have any babes that I would say are heavily tattooed and pierced you must have short term memory loss then if you cant remember me criticising output on the channels. I criticised babestation the other night when for me certain babes were dominating the night and others on that night weren't getting a look in RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - MARCCE - 20-01-2014 15:36 (20-01-2014 14:28 )Rammyrascal Wrote: wouldn't say myself there is far too many heavily tattooed and pierced babes on the channels these days. off the top of my head as im typing this, babestation only has 1 babe Rebecca Crow that I would say is heavily tattooed and pierced, rlc for me only has 1 babe Ava Blue that I would say is heavily tattooed and pierced. S66 at the moment doesn't have any babes at the moment for me that I would say are heavily tattooed and pierced, storm has 1 babe nancy roxxx, that I would say is heavily tattooed and pierced and xxxpanded don't for me have any babes that I would say are heavily tattooed and pierced I never mentioned piercing. You're taking what I said and seemingly taking it to mean I'm referring to a limited type. Besides which our ideas of heavily tattooed are very different because as far as I'm concerned someone like Mica is heavily tattooed. I'm glad you mentioned xxxpanded there because out of all the channels they seem the ones either willing or able to find natural looking girls. Do I think all the channels should have wall to wall girls of that type? No because I accept there are different tastes. Personally speaking though, most of the channels have gone much too far in the other direction and I'm bored with being confronted by channel after channel of hideously unnatural looking boob jobs often, though not always, accompanied with an armful of tattoos. Apologies I must have missed that criticism amongst the deluge of "good night by so and so. Some nice arse wiggling" posts that seem to be the norm with you. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 20-01-2014 15:56 ^^^^ Yeah I wouldn't say mica is as a heavily tattooed babe. For me someone like Ava blue or former s66 babe moness is a heavily tattooed babe. Regarding boob jobs, fair enough you don't like boob jobs, but to describe them as bowling ball boob jobs or hideously unnatural isn't nice at all RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - MARCCE - 20-01-2014 16:30 (20-01-2014 15:56 )Rammyrascal Wrote: ^^^^ Yeah I wouldn't say mica is as a heavily tattooed babe. For me someone like Ava blue or former s66 babe moness is a heavily tattooed babe. Regarding boob jobs, fair enough you don't like boob jobs, but to describe them as bowling ball boob jobs or hideously unnatural isn't nice at all I haven't singled anyone out and it's just my opinion. Having said that if it does come across to anyone as not being nice, there's more than enough gratuitous fawning across the various forums to redress the balance. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 20-01-2014 17:29 (19-01-2014 14:43 )MARCCE Wrote:people always say this and i find it an exaggeration, there aren't many girls on these channels who have really massive fake tits, a lot of them have decent size fake boobs like DD EE size, natural boobs are overrated esp small natural,(17-01-2014 08:09 )Lotuseater Wrote: The shows are shockingly bad at the moment. Last night was atrocious, very poor line-up across the channels and and since new year I've noticed very cautious producers and inhibited girls. im not a big fan of tats although some babes can pull it off better than others esp if you have only ever seen them with tats from when they started on the shows, and yes the shows are bad atm but tell me something new btw, Tori Lee, Yazmine James and Lilly Roma were voted as babe of the year for their respective channels in 2013 and they all have something in common do you know what that is? |