+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Storm (/forumdisplay.php?fid=115)
+---- Thread: Storm - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=32660)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Bigbang86 - 03-08-2014 16:45
If they did then say that. I can say that the only place i say storm was via the webstream. I have stopped watching since
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - richpk - 04-08-2014 15:51
(01-08-2014 12:10 )southlondonphil Wrote:(01-08-2014 11:43 )zizelmy Wrote: Like they don't get many calls from the webstream?
Didn't Storm actually say at one point that their webstream accounted for almost zero calls? If so it wouldn't be worth the cost of running it.
if the did say they then they are just blatantly lying
like many people, i could only watch Storm thru the stream and called regularly. hence the reason we want to stream back.
the reason they dont want a web stream, they want to save money. simple as that
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - admiral decker - 04-08-2014 18:47
(04-08-2014 15:51 )richpk Wrote: if the did say they then they are just blatantly lying
like many people, i could only watch Storm thru the stream and called regularly. hence the reason we want to stream back.
the reason they dont want a web stream, they want to save money. simple as that
You have managed to completely contradict yourself.
First of all you say Storm do profit from the webstream and they are lying if they say otherwise. Then you say they don't profit from the webstream and are saving money by not having it. Your claims are contradictory and can't both be correct, so which one do you think is the truth?
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 04-08-2014 22:46
Elle and Daisy both looking smokin' hot tonight
.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - richpk - 06-08-2014 20:55
(04-08-2014 18:47 )admiral decker Wrote:i didnt contradict myself at all. I was replying to the comment about them saying the webstream generate zero calls, which is a lie(04-08-2014 15:51 )richpk Wrote: if the did say they then they are just blatantly lying
like many people, i could only watch Storm thru the stream and called regularly. hence the reason we want to stream back.
the reason they dont want a web stream, they want to save money. simple as that
You have managed to completely contradict yourself.
First of all you say Storm do profit from the webstream and they are lying if they say otherwise. Then you say they don't profit from the webstream and are saving money by not having it. Your claims are contradictory and can't both be correct, so which one do you think is the truth?
where did i mention profits anywhere in my comment? its a cost cutting measure to get rid of the webstream, thats the only reason to do so but the lie is them claiming it generate ZERO CALLS
wish people actually read comments properly on the internet
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - admiral decker - 06-08-2014 20:59
(06-08-2014 20:55 )richpk Wrote: I was replying to the comment about them saying the webstream generate zero calls, which is a lie
wish people actually read comments properly on the internet
No, not zero calls. The comment was ALMOST zero calls.
Wish people actually read comments properly on the internet
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 06-08-2014 21:13
(04-08-2014 18:47 )admiral decker Wrote:(04-08-2014 15:51 )richpk Wrote: if the did say they then they are just blatantly lying
like many people, i could only watch Storm thru the stream and called regularly. hence the reason we want to stream back.
the reason they dont want a web stream, they want to save money. simple as that
You have managed to completely contradict yourself.
First of all you say Storm do profit from the webstream and they are lying if they say otherwise. Then you say they don't profit from the webstream and are saving money by not having it. Your claims are contradictory and can't both be correct, so which one do you think is the truth?
You're confusing profit with revenue
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - admiral decker - 06-08-2014 21:17
(06-08-2014 21:13 )The Silent Majority Wrote: You're confusing profit with revenue
Where's the confusion then?
Storm don't get enough calls from the webstream to make it worth having, so they don't bother with it. I don't see any confusion.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 06-08-2014 21:31
It's not as simple as counting calls to webstream numbers versus tv numbers.
How do they know that people watching the webstream aren't using the number advertised on the television show. People aren't stupid, if there's money to be saved.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - davy crockett - 06-08-2014 21:38
(06-08-2014 21:31 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: How do they know that people watching the webstream aren't using the number advertised on the television show.
If such a thing was happening then the people responsible have destroyed the webstream by making it seem unprofitable.