+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Storm (/forumdisplay.php?fid=115)
+---- Thread: Storm - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=32660)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 06-08-2014 23:33
(06-08-2014 23:22 )admiral decker Wrote:(06-08-2014 23:11 )Bandwagon Wrote: Especially since little/lack of profit is most likely the reason for the stream closure anyway.
Yes, exactly right.
Nobody's saying any different
Perhaps you need to go back a couple of pages and start again.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - admiral decker - 07-08-2014 00:16
(06-08-2014 23:33 )The Silent Majority Wrote: Nobody's saying any different
Perhaps you need to go back a couple of pages and start again.
If everyone accepts that Bandwagon and I are right it would not be productive to go back a couple of pages and start again, although I nevertheless seem to remember that Storm were accused of lying about their reasons for not keeping the stream going.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - richpk - 07-08-2014 15:14
(06-08-2014 20:59 )admiral decker Wrote:(06-08-2014 20:55 )richpk Wrote: I was replying to the comment about them saying the webstream generate zero calls, which is a lie
wish people actually read comments properly on the internet
No, not zero calls. The comment was ALMOST zero calls.
Wish people actually read comments properly on the internet
you are annoying arent you. you are still 100% wrong about what i said
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - richpk - 07-08-2014 15:15
(06-08-2014 21:54 )admiral decker Wrote:(06-08-2014 21:42 )The Silent Majority Wrote: richpk never claimed they were making profit from the webstream, he said they were getting revenue from it.
Profit and revenue are two different things, he wasn't contradicting himself.
But they don't get enough revenue to make it worth bothering with. Unless there is enough revenue to make a profit the service isn't likely to continue. Surely that much is obvious.
Storm didn't ever deny receiving revenue. They denied receiving ENOUGH revenue to make the service viable.
which is what i said if you read my post correctly
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - richpk - 07-08-2014 15:17
(06-08-2014 21:31 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: It's not as simple as counting calls to webstream numbers versus tv numbers.
How do they know that people watching the webstream aren't using the number advertised on the television show. People aren't stupid, if there's money to be saved.
that is 100% true and most likely reason the numbers dont add up for them
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - admiral decker - 07-08-2014 15:32
(07-08-2014 15:15 )richpk Wrote: which is what i said if you read my post correctly
So you said that Storm were lying and I said they weren't lying, but according to you we're both right.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - richpk - 07-08-2014 16:04
(07-08-2014 15:32 )admiral decker Wrote:(07-08-2014 15:15 )richpk Wrote: which is what i said if you read my post correctly
So you said that Storm were lying and I said they weren't lying, but according to you we're both right.
are you really this stupid?
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 07-08-2014 22:00
(07-08-2014 00:16 )admiral decker Wrote: it would not be productive to go back a couple of pages and start again
But then you might be able to grasp the point I made.
Unless you're being deliberately obtuse, of course.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - barracuda - 07-08-2014 22:07
Is it my imagination or does the picture quality on Storm vary from night to night?
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - rusty legrand - 08-08-2014 11:51
(06-08-2014 22:43 )admiral decker Wrote: You are almost right. You just need to substitute revenues for profits, i.e. the cost of running it is greater than revenues lost since it's closure.
is there high cost of running the stream?