+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: BABESTATION TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Thread: Babestation : Freeview vs Sky (/showthread.php?tid=13807)
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - iamthatjack - 25-09-2011 17:44
I don't care how snobbish this sounds, but I am sick of hearing the 'woe is me' act freeviewers have.
Yes you might have paid a one-off for your equipment, but that's it, you don't pay anything else at all for all the channels you get, so stop whining about something you are getting for free, and be grateful that you have an option like freeview, and that they have any of the babeshow channels at all!
I have sky, and I pay a substantial amount a month for it, and I personally believe for that, I should be entitled to better viewing than a freeviewer. Why should we have the same channels with the same content when I am paying for it and you aren't?
If it's free, you are entitled to nothing, so stop you complaining and be grateful you have anything at all
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - vila - 25-09-2011 17:57
(25-09-2011 17:44 )iamthatjack Wrote: Why should we have the same channels with the same content when I am paying for it and you aren't?
How many more times and in how many different ways do we have to say this?
You pay NOTHING for the babe channels - they're free-to-air, NOBODY pays to receive them. READ the posts above, ffs.
Whatever you pay to Sky is for your chosen subscription pack and nothing else.
The only people who pay for these channels are those who phone in to talk/listen or buy services like pics and videos.
The only payments made to Sky for the babe channels are the fees the channels themselves pay to have their shows on the Sky platform.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 25-09-2011 17:59
(25-09-2011 17:44 )iamthatjack Wrote: I don't care how snobbish this sounds, but I am sick of hearing the 'woe is me' act freeviewers have.
Yes you might have paid a one-off for your equipment, but that's it, you don't pay anything else at all for all the channels you get, so stop whining about something you are getting for free, and be grateful that you have an option like freeview, and that they have any of the babeshow channels at all!
I have sky, and I pay a substantial amount a month for it, and I personally believe for that, I should be entitled to better viewing than a freeviewer. Why should we have the same channels with the same content when I am paying for it and you aren't?
If it's free, you are entitled to nothing, so stop you complaining and be grateful you have anything at all
That's your choice to pay the "substantial" amount for non babe channels , if you stopped paying this substantial amount you would still get to see the all babe channels for free , don't forget some freeview viewers also pay substantial amounts to watch non babe channels on freeview as well , freeview has also got non babe channels subscription channels packages that cost substantial amounts too .
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - iamthatjack - 25-09-2011 18:03
By paying for sky, I am entitled to better quality viewing that a freeview subscriber, babeshows and other channels (such as sky1 etc)
As a result, the babeshow channels on sky should be of a higher quality than those of freeview.
If you actually read my posts, not once did I say I was paying for the babeshow channels, but sky in general
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - vila - 25-09-2011 18:06
(25-09-2011 18:03 )iamthatjack Wrote: By paying for sky, I am entitled to better quality viewing that a freeview subscriber,
No, you are not. That entitles you to receive the channels you have chosen to subscribe to. Nothing more.
Edit: End of. Stop showing yourself up.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - iamthatjack - 25-09-2011 18:13
Ridiculous! You honestly think you should get the same viewing experience as someone who has Sky?
You just sound bitter
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 25-09-2011 18:57
(25-09-2011 18:13 )iamthatjack Wrote: Ridiculous! You honestly think you should get the same viewing experience as someone who has Sky?
For free channels, why not?
By your logic sky viewers should not get the benefit of watching BBC1, BBC2, ITV1 etc through their sky system because they 'belong' to freeview.
RE: Freeview vs Sky moaning thread - dave34 - 25-09-2011 21:52
if you wanted to you can jest watch the free to air channels on your sky box without paying this is called free sat from sky or you could switch to free sat it's self. but that dose not have a lot of babe shows right now.
also not everyone can have sky. so freeview is the only other way to watch TV.
RE: Freeview vs Sky moaning thread - rockey - 25-09-2011 22:00
i would be happy with bbc 1,2,3,4 ,itv channels and channel 4 the other channels all 1000 plus are offensive to anybody with a brain and should be regulated out of existence.
RE: Freeview vs Sky moaning thread - vila - 26-09-2011 00:56
(25-09-2011 21:52 )dave34 Wrote: if you wanted to you can jest watch the free to air channels on your sky box without paying this is called free sat from sky or you could switch to free sat it's self. but that dose not have a lot of babe shows right now.
also not everyone can have sky. so freeview is the only other way to watch TV.
I'm fairly sure you can do a manual scan and store them under 'Other Channels', or some similar heading.