+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom stuff - mrmann - 18-08-2010 22:21
(13-08-2010 23:36 )eccles Wrote: [SNIP - See eccles post here http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?pid=594470#pid594470]
Well said!
RE: Ofcom stuff - TheWatcher - 24-08-2010 16:41
I just did a google search on Square 1 Management, following someone's post today about Partyland.
One of the first links found was this old report
http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/news/multi-platform/news/hosts-sexual-antics-cost-channel17500/1709854.article
It seems ofcom were picking on SmileTV then instead of Bangbabes
This was the actual complaint for which they were fined
1.3. Ofcom received a complaint on 23 May 2007 about the explicit sexual nature
of the content broadcast on Smile TV on 22 May 2007 at around 22.25. The
complainant referred to shots in which a female presenter appeared to insert
her fingers into her anus several times and masturbate for a number of
minutes.
1.4. In the material complained of the presenter wore only a thong and appeared
to carry out the actions described by the complainant. There were also
prolonged shots of her lying on her back, with her legs wide apart in front of
the camera, apparently masturbating through the thong. She also
encouraged viewers to call her by saying, for example: “Well, I tell you what,
you’re not lasting a second tonight guys. Maybe it’s all my oil on my shaved
minge…If you’d like to hear some explicit chat tonight, while you’re having a
good old tommy tank…” [rhyming slang for ‘wank’ – i.e. masturbation].
RE: Ofcom stuff - kaelene - 24-08-2010 16:47
(24-08-2010 16:41 )TheWatcher Wrote: I just did a google search on Square 1 Management, following someone's post today about Partyland.
One of the first links found was this old report
http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/news/multi-platform/news/hosts-sexual-antics-cost-channel17500/1709854.article
It seems ofcom were picking on SmileTV then instead of Bangbabes
This was the actual complaint for which they were fined
1.3. Ofcom received a complaint on 23 May 2007 about the explicit sexual nature
of the content broadcast on Smile TV on 22 May 2007 at around 22.25. The
complainant referred to shots in which a female presenter appeared to insert
her fingers into her anus several times and masturbate for a number of
minutes.
1.4. In the material complained of the presenter wore only a thong and appeared
to carry out the actions described by the complainant. There were also
prolonged shots of her lying on her back, with her legs wide apart in front of
the camera, apparently masturbating through the thong. She also
encouraged viewers to call her by saying, for example: “Well, I tell you what,
you’re not lasting a second tonight guys. Maybe it’s all my oil on my shaved
minge…If you’d like to hear some explicit chat tonight, while you’re having a
good old tommy tank…” [rhyming slang for ‘wank’ – i.e. masturbation].
it was me who did the post on partyland was that ofcom think from freeview or sky? bangbabes would not of been on freeview then smiletv been on freeview for years now it only use to be one channel partypeople
RE: Ofcom stuff - TheWatcher - 24-08-2010 16:53
(24-08-2010 16:47 )kaelene Wrote: it was me who did the post on partyland was that ofcom think from freeview or sky? bangbabes would not of been on freeview then smiletv been on freeview for years now it only use to be one channel partypeople
It was on Sky.
There was no babe stuff transmitted on Freeview before midnight until PartyPeople/PartyGirls started at 9pm in September 2008
RE: Ofcom stuff - mr mystery - 24-08-2010 17:36
(24-08-2010 16:41 )TheWatcher Wrote: I just did a google search on Square 1 Management, following someone's post today about Partyland.If i remember correctly the Sky babe channel channel named "smile tv" was not around for long it was re-branded as "blue kiss" , all the Cellcast girls used to work on the "smile tv/bluekiss show including one girl in particular that used to wear a tiny G string and cover herself in oil and she used to put on extremely explicit shows , the girl in question was Jet Black . Square 1 management is part of the Cellcast group . I think but not sure the Cellcast shows at this time had the British 18 cert licence because they used to show a big 18 sign at the start of their shows , later on the Cellcast shows dropped the big 18 sign and started showing the big Dutch 16 cert sign that they use today , did Cellcast purchase the Dutch licence to get Ofcom off their backs ? if so then Bangmedia should do the same .
One of the first links found was this old report
http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/news/multi-platform/news/hosts-sexual-antics-cost-channel17500/1709854.article
It seems ofcom were picking on SmileTV then instead of Bangbabes
This was the actual complaint for which they were fined
1.3. Ofcom received a complaint on 23 May 2007 about the explicit sexual nature
of the content broadcast on Smile TV on 22 May 2007 at around 22.25. The
complainant referred to shots in which a female presenter appeared to insert
her fingers into her anus several times and masturbate for a number of
minutes.
1.4. In the material complained of the presenter wore only a thong and appeared
to carry out the actions described by the complainant. There were also
prolonged shots of her lying on her back, with her legs wide apart in front of
the camera, apparently masturbating through the thong. She also
encouraged viewers to call her by saying, for example: “Well, I tell you what,
you’re not lasting a second tonight guys. Maybe it’s all my oil on my shaved
minge…If you’d like to hear some explicit chat tonight, while you’re having a
good old tommy tank…” [rhyming slang for ‘wank’ – i.e. masturbation].
RE: Ofcom stuff - HenryF - 28-08-2010 09:42
How many threads are there about Ofcom's actions? Let it go - this has been ongoing since the organisation was formed and until one or all of the channels challenge Ofcom in law on the accuracy and legality of the code then all other commentary is wasted.
RE: Ofcom stuff - Scottishbloke - 28-08-2010 19:35
(28-08-2010 09:42 )HenryF Wrote: How many threads are there about Ofcom's actions? Let it go - this has been ongoing since the organisation was formed and until one or all of the channels challenge Ofcom in law on the accuracy and legality of the code then all other commentary is wasted.
Yes I agree no number of posts will ever change the views at ofcom as I doubt they even go on this forum. But its a good way for people to vent their frustration at an organisation not in touch with 21st century Britain. But I've said before in previous posts all it needs is a change at the top in ofcom and if it just so happens to be a liberal pot smoking open minded person then perhaps the babe channels will maybe have the current restrictions squashed. If that were the case we would then be able to pick on the management of these channels if it failed to deliver as ofcom has been all too a convient excuse for airing shit shows throughout the years and could almost be used as a scapegoat on many occasions but without ofcom the channels would have no excuse up their sleeves and only then would they have to stand up and deliver. If ofcom remain a viable excuse then the babe channels will continue to air inconsistent shows.
[split] Bang Babes: Further breaches & possible new sanctions - Scottishbloke - 28-08-2010 21:03
It still makes you wonder who actually won the war. In Germany they can show what the fuck they want after a certain time, this country should do likewise. Stop the censorship and get back to the real politics and let tv do exactly what its suposed to do to fucking entertain us. Ofcom go and take a fuckin jump of the nearest cliff.
RE: Bang Babes: Further breaches & possible new sanctions - Scotsman - 28-08-2010 22:21
I think since Ofcom are pouring all their staff into the project to destroy the channels by watching them 24/7 and apparently also having someone man the computers everyday looking for slip vids on this forum, we should really start screening new members.
Maybe have them write a 200 word essay on why they should be allowed on the forum? Maybe include a multiple choice section and test them on their knowledge of the babeshows. If it's good, we know they're a fan. If it's perfect and strangely accurate, we'll know it's Ofcom.
RE: Ofcom stuff - Scottishbloke - 29-08-2010 20:27
Old fashioned nudity never harmed anybody whats wrong with simply entertaining an adult audience who have quite clearly tuned into these channels for a very good reason. We live in a free world these days where all tastes should be tolerated and respected. I don't watch the god channel because religion just isn't my thing but I have no objection that these channels exist. Its a democracy afterall so lets put the great back into britain and stop fucking around with free society instead embrace all the different tastes on the sky epg with an open mind. Watch religion, sport, sex whatever your preference is should be irelevent and anybody whos offended well fuck you change the channel as I've stated everybodys taste is catered for on sky. Stop the fucking up the channels and everyone is happy.