Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237) +---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266) +----- Forum: Former Studio 66 Daytime babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=312) +----- Thread: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=22764) |
RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - kru92 - 05-09-2010 22:40 Gents are there any caps/vids of this??? RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - theone1986 - 06-09-2010 02:32 (05-09-2010 22:40 )kru92 Wrote: Gents are there any caps/vids of this??? yep loads here http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=24051 RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - HEX!T - 06-09-2010 04:18 (30-08-2010 17:57 )vila Wrote:yer rite. art is supposed to stimulate emotions and imagination a higher function in the human brain. but this is not art because it stimulates arousal and corupt thought a lower base function in the brain.(30-08-2010 17:19 )Webbiola Wrote: Have we now decided that despite the fact that this is the sex industry with semi or fully naked girls talking filth, simulating sex acts and orgasms with we as viewers and callers well.........wanking that this is, despite all this, an art form? that is a major difference between art and pornography. no disrespect to the girls but it is laughable that some call it art... sorry thats just an excuse to justify to themselves the fact there talking dirty to wankers. it is what it is. RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - vila - 06-09-2010 05:05 (06-09-2010 04:18 )HEX!T Wrote: it is what it is. Quite correct. What it is is entertainment and entertainment is art. QED. RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - HEX!T - 06-09-2010 05:33 sorry cant agree m8. its nice that you think it is but art is subjective and the way its described here it just isnt. you could argue till the cows come home but there is s specifyed definition of art and you said it. but it doesnt mean these shows qualify. artistic maybe, but not art. RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - ergot - 06-09-2010 09:29 As a big fan of Rachel and Becky wherever they appear, I couldn't miss their first nightshow special on Elite. And it was so amazing I'm driven (finally ) to post here to say thanks! It's no surprise to see what a fantastic reception they got, they were so natural and what a perfect combination. Can't wait for their return. RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - vila - 06-09-2010 16:20 (06-09-2010 05:33 )HEX!T Wrote: sorry cant agree m8. its nice that you think it is but art is subjective and the way its described here it just isnt. "art is subjective" but "there is s specifyed definition of art" and the shows are "artistic", "but not art"????? I don't think this is worth any further comment. RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - Webbiola - 06-09-2010 18:48 (06-09-2010 16:20 )vila Wrote:(06-09-2010 05:33 )HEX!T Wrote: sorry cant agree m8. its nice that you think it is but art is subjective and the way its described here it just isnt. Nice to see intellectual argument and counter argument for a change. What a great forum this is! RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - mikeboob - 06-09-2010 18:50 They are on again now, wonder if they'll drop any hints about a post 9 pm re-match RE: Becky & Rachel Night Show Special - Caps & Vids - irish_boy - 07-09-2010 15:04 I CAN'T BELIEVE I MISSED THIS THE TWO BEST DAYTIME GIRLS ON NIGHTS!!!!!!!!! can anyone please tell me when they are on next pleaseee |