Babestation Encrypted - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Babestation Xtra (/forumdisplay.php?fid=150) +--- Thread: Babestation Encrypted (/showthread.php?tid=83923) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 |
RE: Babestation Encrypted - trains55 - 29-08-2021 19:31 (29-08-2021 14:16 )gooner bob Wrote:(28-08-2021 21:31 )seducedx6 Wrote: it's difficult to justify ppv for much of what I've seen on BSX, that barely diverges from what can be shown otherwise. And Amber and Jamie were also on (together!) and they both went naked BUT we didn't see any pussy! It was only when Beth appeared for literally the last 4 minutes that we saw any pussy hers is lovely!) BUT only for a few seconds before she was on her front! So just like a normal TV nightshow !!!! I vowed never to buy a pin for the show but only watched it because BS in their "wisdom" send me a free pin!! But from the few shows that I have seen its nowhere near as good as I feel it should be: it's like paying for mainstream TV nightshow!!!!,.......... RE: Babestation Encrypted - seducedx6 - 29-08-2021 23:59 I recall a few months ago, when on a streaming site.. seeing Olivia and Alice, looking like they were having a lively time! I didn't have the £€$ or credit, to see anything directly below the waist, alas. It did look like they might have been fisting each other, which isn't something I would have expected them to do, on camera, before then, alas. I might well have been, far off the mark, nonetheless! It might have been as mild, rather than wild, as I would have expected. Recordings did later appear on that site, but not showing anything that might not have been shown, in a soft porn film on an ordinary tv channel. The recordings did later disappear from the site, puzzlingly!? I did think the show might have been exclusive to that site. As I found nothing about it, on the BS site. But I later found ads on Olivia and Alice's Twitter pages. Neither of them, are particular favourites of mine, but they don't turn me off, especially, either. If the action was as good as it seemed, I would have been happy to pay to see it. Whilst I was typing much of this, one of the things I was distracted by, was some of tonight's BSX shows. Again, none of my favourites were on, when I was watching. However, Valentina can be quite lively. But, she wasn't on for very long, and the camera was more active. It was moving around, into angles that gave shots that were baffling. On these channels, camera movement frequently puzzles me. When it would be better for the camera to be still, on a tripod, and movement left to the women in shot. It's similar in too much porn, such as some Evil Angel scenes, where there are diagonal shots, often at crucial moments. Eye level is where I would want the camera to be, when women are upright, seated or standing, with face to feet, in shot. But that doesn't happen often enough. When women are lying on their stomach, as Ashley was earlier, the camera being slightly above eye level, angled so her back is in shot, was just the way I like it. I have a thing about ladies' ensellures, which is where the lower back meets the buttocks. I also refer to it, more loosely, as lumbar line, and rump ramp. However, Ashley was doing something which happens a lot, on BS and 66, often looking above the camera, rather than at it. SMH I was also watching Ashley on pervcam, when she was off tv. It was much less disappointing, than when I watched her last October: https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=62388&pid=2502493#pid2502493 Ashley was lying on her back, playing with her kitty, of which there was a good view. Also, she had her butt to camera, some of the time, with the full breadth of it, in shot, for a short time. In both positions, there were glimpses of her (*) in shot. Particularly, in the former position, ironically. Although, watching live rewind of Ashley's time on 673, from just after midnight, in the position I described above, lying on her stomach, on the desk, in the study set, she had the pervecam behind her, and was knickerless. So that was a missed opportunity, to see much more of what I saw on pervecam, than I saw when she was off tv! The logical conclusion to draw, might be that at least, sometimes, it's better to watch TV, combined with pervecam, rather than either off-tv pervecam, or BSX! RE: Babestation Encrypted - seducedx6 - 30-08-2021 20:55 Just to clarify, the last part of post #159 https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=83923&pid=2606191#pid2606191 For those who might not know, "the overlapping 'preview' hour, till midnight, on 674", is a 'preview' of BSX. RE: Babestation Encrypted - Count Spankula - 30-08-2021 21:39 (29-08-2021 23:59 )seducedx6 Wrote: Valentina can be quite lively. But, she wasn't on for very long, and the camera was more active. It was moving around, into angles that gave shots that were baffling. Yes there were some unusual camera shots when Valentina was on, but I thought it was OK. I don't mind the camera moving around, it was different. Also last night, Beth and Amber did a surprisingly good show together, which I wasn't really expecting because these girl-girl shows are usually non-events these days. Jamie Knight did her usual buzz show. RE: Babestation Encrypted - mysterion - 01-09-2021 21:25 I've seen a few coments in this thread about there not being any external girls or guests anymore, only Babestation girls these days, but I think that's exactly what they should be doing on this channel. I'd say that for most potential viewers it's surely Babestation girls that they would be most interested in seeing. RE: Babestation Encrypted - davy crockett - 02-09-2021 14:29 I know this channel is often a non-event, but I've got to say that Beth did a pretty amazing show on Monday. I'd rate it even higher than an Atlanta show, that's how good it was. Azura Alii did a show that was nothing special but she did go a bit further than you would see on the main channels, whilst Mia Yasmin stood in a bikini for her entire performance which was shot from one of those unusual angles that have been referred to in above posts. In this case an upward shot from the floor behind her. The real entertainment was left to Beth and one of the best channels I've seen on this channel for a long time. RE: Babestation Encrypted - marlowe - 02-09-2021 17:08 (28-08-2021 21:31 )seducedx6 Wrote: My having discovered, only since being able to see BSX, that it ends at midnight, makes ppv even more questionable. I'd assumed that transmissions continued on the red button, after 673 started free-to-air. The channel used to finish at 4:45 if I recall correctly and stayed that way for many years. Then the closing time changed to 3:00 and then to 1:00 and now to midnight as you say, although since the midnight close was introduced it starts an hour earlier than it always did. You'd have to say on the face of it that it's less value for money than it used to be, but on the other hand it depends so much on the quality of the shows. The 1 hour 50 minutes we have now is still enough time to put on a worthwhile even excellent broadcast. RE: Babestation Encrypted - Preeti Fan - 03-09-2021 14:59 The last couple of nights have been good for those of us who like the twins. On Thursday Priya put on a great show, with Jamie Knight and Mia Yasmin acting as fillers, and Preeti did the same on Wednesday when Beth played a starring role too, with Alice acting as filler. Nothing is guaranteed on this channel, although it probably should be when it's an encrypted show, but it does have its good nights. RE: Babestation Encrypted - seducedx6 - 03-09-2021 22:52 This is just a note, adding to posts 163, and 159: possibly the worst, and most absurd part, of "the overlapping 'preview' hour, till midnight, on 674", and falling below basic standards of advertising, is that it gives no clear indication of BSX's transmission times. Hence, not only does the 'preview' end, at the same time, as the transmissions it's promoting, it doesn't actually inform you of that. Furthermore, the red button remains onscreen, throughout the free-to-air hours, 00:00-05:00, and if you've watched the BSX stream, pressing it brings a notice thanking you, but if you didn't pay before midnight, the message giving you the details to access it, still appears, on pressing it. I think this is definitely, among the things I've written about, across various forum threads, that would fit into the thread I opened, two weeks ago: https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=84422 If after midnight, your £€$ is accepted, and it's not clear that it wouldn't be, that would be a case of "delivering less than claiming to offer", and "etc.", as essential details about what's being offered, and when, are absent. After midnight, pressing the red button, might just as well bring a message, saying something similar to "it closes at midnight, but you might still be charged". I will respond to those who have replied to me, within the next couple days. RE: Babestation Encrypted - Count Spankula - 04-09-2021 13:54 I watched last night for Valentina but nothing much happened to write about. She had a tip goal going, which I'm guessing was for full nudity. I missed the very beginning of her show, so I didn't know what it was for, but in the end the goal wasn't met anyway. It was left to the following girl - Beth - to step up and provide the night's fireworks, which she did with great style. |