Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shan_123 - 08-07-2012 18:35 (08-07-2012 17:56 )Scottishbloke Wrote: First of all in responce to Dan, I can pretty much hold my own on this forum and I'll stand my ground with anybody. I know ofcom have the rules you been going on about but it's not like at this present time ofcom are targeting channels, correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't masti chat the only show to date to get told off, I swear elite, red light ain't got nothing for ages? Even if you check the bulletin there's no sign of the babe channels. Ofcom is there and is a threat but you can't really complain about the present time can you? I think your comment regarding ofcom shutting down channels without warning or notice is a little over exaggerated don't you think? RE: Ofcom Discussion - munch1917 - 08-07-2012 18:55 (08-07-2012 17:56 )Scottishbloke Wrote: ... I'm certainly not as familiar with the intricacies of Ofcoms rules and regulations as some on this forum, but I'm pretty sure that statement is untrue. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Rammyrascal - 08-07-2012 18:59 yeah ofcom will only shut a channel down if it keeps getting breaches & fines etc and isnt doing anything to stop that. thats what happened with bangbabes. it was their repeated breaches of the ofcom rules with no sign of doing anything to stop this that led to ofcom revoking the licences also ofcom do give notice about sanctions etc. they always say they are investigating a channel first, the channel then put forward their side of the argument. ofcom then decide if the complaint is to be thrown out or what sort of punishment to give out also not nice having a go at tumble drier just because he's posting opinions that disagree with you. fair enough you disagree with him but to personally attack him as much as you have is uncalled for. he is definately not trolling as you say. he is just saying his opinion RE: Ofcom Discussion - blackjaques - 08-07-2012 19:15 (08-07-2012 18:59 )Rammyrascal Wrote: yeah ofcom will only shut a channel down if it keeps getting breaches & fines etc and isnt doing anything to stop that. thats what happened with bangbabes. it was their repeated breaches of the ofcom rules with no sign of doing anything to stop this that led to ofcom revoking the licences You're right, Rammy, but it's the way they go about it is one of the problems for me. The zeal with which they pursue breachers of their code if they are the sex channels is something out of the 15th Century. You then have this ridiculous claim that kids are regularly watching the encrypted shows so no penetration or fellatio can be shown because these kids need protecting from seeing that. Is it any wonder that adults on here express incredulity and disgust at this unelected quango telling us what is good for us, acting like the social services and the police all in one. it's total bollax. They don't want sex on UK TV, they are secure in this policy because they are backed by the UK government. I.M.O. anyway. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 08-07-2012 19:19 Aye well Rammy it's takes a troll to know one doesn't it. I see you are avoiding the question just about just how sincere your posts are by clearly deflecting the issue. Also what the fuck has happened to this thread lately. If Tumble Drier wasn't trolling I'd like to know what is, his support for ofcom is unequivocal. He even had ofcom fan under is avator before he changed it. So just what side exactly do you sit on these days Rammy, I think we'd all love to know because the words Judas, 2 faced and treason spring to mind here RE: Ofcom Discussion - gazfc - 08-07-2012 19:44 (08-07-2012 19:19 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Aye well Rammy it's takes a troll to know one doesn't it. I see you are avoiding the question just about just how sincere your posts are by clearly deflecting the issue. Also what the fuck has happened to this thread lately. If Tumble Drier wasn't trolling I'd like to know what is, his support for ofcom is unequivocal. He even had ofcom fan under is avator before he changed it. So just what side exactly do you sit on these days Rammy, I think we'd all love to know because the words Judas, 2 faced and treason spring to mind here I'd say that's trolling RE: Ofcom Discussion - dan g 27 - 08-07-2012 19:49 I agree with Munch a few posts back, everyone is entitled to an opinion on this subject RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 08-07-2012 19:56 Opinion and being 2 faced are 2 completely different issues here, let's be very clear on that one, anyway can we please now get this Thread back on track by fighting these fucking cunts at ofcom HQ. So yes sure no recent complaints have been made but have you ever heard of the saying the calm before the storm. Ofcom are quiet at the moment probably mainly down to the fact that Ed Richards was unsuccessful in his application to become the new head of the BBC but we are not out of the woods just yet, Ofcom could still unleash their full wrath on any channel at any given time or date. RE: Ofcom Discussion - dan g 27 - 08-07-2012 19:58 (08-07-2012 19:56 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Opinion and being 2 faced are 2 completely different issues here, let's be very clear on that one, anyway can we please now get this Thread back on track by fighting these fucking cunts at ofcom HQ.Depends RE: Ofcom Discussion - iloveMegan - 08-07-2012 20:13 (08-07-2012 19:19 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Also what the fuck has happened to this thread lately. If Tumble Drier wasn't trolling I'd like to know what is, his support for ofcom is unequivocal. The title of this thread is "Ofcom Discussion", whether or not Tumble_Drier or any other person is a Ofcom supporter they are allowed to post here. |