The UK Babe Channels Forum
US Election & Presidency - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Forum: All Other Subjects (/forumdisplay.php?fid=114)
+---- Forum: News Zone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=111)
+---- Thread: US Election & Presidency (/showthread.php?tid=68468)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766


RE: US Election & Presidency - SecretAgent - 26-05-2017 14:51

^^ looks like you still don't understand. They don't "owe" anything. It's a target for their own Defence spending. They spend it on their own soldiers & warships etc. It's not a contract - it's a target.


RE: US Election & Presidency - wackawoo - 26-05-2017 16:02

(26-05-2017 14:51 )SecretAgent Wrote:  ^^ looks like you still don't understand. They don't "owe" anything. It's a target for their own Defence spending. They spend it on their own soldiers & warships etc. It's not a contract - it's a target.

I told you I knew nothing about it.

You agree trump is right, that they have not met their target, other people do not disagree.

I ask specifically, is spending on their own military counted, and if so, are they are all meeting their targets. In your usual round about abusive way you have aswered both.

You say it's a target, i assume this target is not being met, is that right? These countries are not meeting the target of 2%.

What seems to be the confusing here is the word 'owe', as if countries pay moniesto NATO, rather than spending 2% (I assme anually) on their own defence that NATO can draw on.

'Meeting their targets', if this be right, then all but 5 countries (including one of the poorest with the greatest finantial difficullties) are not meeting their targets. Which probably means that their countries are lacking militarily compaired to the other 5, which means, looking at Terences figures, the US makes up the short fall if there's a war.

That is, they have a much greater military presence to draw on if NATO ever needs it.

Of course it all depends on the size of countries, Greece may have a much smaller militray might than Germany despite meeting it's targets.

Either way, prety sure they have enough to kill everybody several times over if they so wished.


RE: US Election & Presidency - Dave_A - 27-05-2017 19:18

(26-05-2017 16:02 )wackawoo Wrote:  
(26-05-2017 14:51 )SecretAgent Wrote:  

I told you I knew nothing about it.

You agree trump is right, that they have not met their target, other people do not disagree.

I know nothing about it either, but they said on CNN news today that Trump was wrong, because the target date was 2024 and not 2017 .

I might have got this a bit wrong myself as i'm trying to remember exactly what they did say on TV.
I think they said that the NATO countries agreed back in 2014 to eventually spend no less than 2% on their own defence, 2024 was a agreed target date at which a minimum of 2% should be spent by all the NATO countries on defence, they also said that presently 22 NATO countries since 2014 had started to increase defence spending, and were on course to spend 2% by 2024 the agreed target date ..

Like i said, i'm not entirely sure what i have said is correct, as i'm trying to remember exactly what they said on CNN news earlier today .


RE: US Election & Presidency - ShandyHand - 28-05-2017 15:01

(25-05-2017 11:24 )babelover48 Wrote:  I hope Mrs May gives Trump a piece of her mind when they meet over leaks in press

I hope no-one is expecting Trump to be consistent on the matter of leaks. bladewave He seems, like a lot of politicians, to regard them as bad only when they don't support his position.

Besides this is a cultural thing... The NYTimes on attitudes to governmental leaking on either side of the Atlantic and how it reflects an historical variance in deference to authority : https://nytimes.com/2017/05/25/world/europe/manchester-bombing-leaks-donald-trump.html

(This is the same deference that allows such rampant censorship to occur over here btw.)

We may feel that we have every right to regard these particular leaks as repugnant and something that should not happen, but their press would do much the same with events on their own soil.

Trump's hypocrisy on leaks is a result of his efforts to establish the anti-establishment stance that subsequently helped get him elected and then having to adopt the needs of government once in power. But then a prime trait of the egoist has always been their unwillingness to acknowledge a propensity to have their cake and eat it! (I mean look at the babes with something for nothing wishlists decrying freeloading viewers. Wink )


RE: US Election & Presidency - munch1917 - 28-05-2017 15:55

^^ I read an article a few weeks back covering th subject of leaks.
It made the point that Trumps camp during the election campaign were quite open about admitting a fondness for Assange and wikileaks, going so far as to admit that they had a 'direct line' to him, 'a man who can hand deliver' stuff if they require. Remember Farage a short while ago being caught exiting the embassy and being very coy about his reasons for being there. I seem to recall some fresh leaks appearing shortly after that (I think Clinton email leaks, not sure now).

Make of that what you will, but like you say, as with most politicians, it's a matter of what works for me is good, what works against me is bad (in similar vein, Trump calling for investigations into Clintons emails, whilst railing against investigations into Russian links in his own camp).


RE: US Election & Presidency - wackawoo - 28-05-2017 21:17

(27-05-2017 19:18 )Dave_A Wrote:  [quote='wackawoo' pid='2041475' dateline='1495814532']


I know nothing about it either, but they said on CNN news today that Trump was wrong, because the target date was 2024 and not 2017 .

I might have got this a bit wrong myself as i'm trying to remember exactly what they did say on TV.
I think they said that the NATO countries agreed back in 2014 to eventually spend no less than 2% on their own defence, 2024 was a agreed target date at which a minimum of 2% should be spent by all the NATO countries on defence, they also said that presently 22 NATO countries since 2014 had started to increase defence spending, and were on course to spend 2% by 2024 the agreed target date ..

Like i said, i'm not entirely sure what i have said is correct, as i'm trying to remember exactly what they said on CNN news earlier today .

Ah right it's the dates that's wrong.

Nice post there friend. simple to the point, none abusive.

This Trump is quite funny though, he acts like a president of a small African dictatorship.


RE: US Election & Presidency - Charlemagne - 29-05-2017 07:00

New French President Emmanuel Macron took on Donald when they met. He gave Trump an overlong white knuckle handshake to show that he wouldn't be giving in to him.


RE: US Election & Presidency - wackawoo - 29-05-2017 11:44

(29-05-2017 07:00 )Charlemagne Wrote:  New French President Emmanuel Macron took on Donald when they met. He gave Trump an overlong white knuckle handshake to show that he wouldn't be giving in to him.

Funny how the French demand the most, get the most and contribute the least.


RE: US Election & Presidency - Censorship :-( - 30-05-2017 12:53

(More?) Trouble in Paradise? Rolleyes

Mike Dubke: White House communications director quits

Thankfully, Sean Spicer's still there. Phew! laugh


RE: US Election & Presidency - terence - 30-05-2017 18:39

effeminate trump! lol. Smile