The UK Babe Channels Forum
Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)



RE: Ofcom Discussion - Johnson007 - 13-07-2012 08:50

I think I may be going mad, but...... I don't like Gamers Model Toy Shops.

So I don't go in them.

I don't stop others doing so, nor do I protest if they want to go gaming all day and night. I just let them get on with it, providing they are over age.

#justsaying


RE: Ofcom Discussion - dogman - 13-07-2012 18:00

Trouble is this country is run by a small group of lefty narrow minded do gooders,who have no grasp of reality,ofcom fall into that bracket,one rule for them,one for the rest.We all know that there stance in that they are protecting minors is a load of bollocks,I would just love one of the channels to take them on next time they are found in breech,and hirer a top legal brief,take them to the high court and ram the strangle hold rules down their throats,to me this is the only way things are going to change in the near future,god I wish I was a multi millionaire,I would fuck them sideways,which it would not surprise me they do to their rentboys on the way home,I know how these fuckers work.


RE: Ofcom Discussion - fedup1 - 14-07-2012 07:42

Big thanks to Eccles i retried that link but its been cut by Guardian as you say..

Day off Wednesday and This Morning was on,,dont fucking believe it images of penises on again with penis enlargement topic..Every channel this year is just taking piss..I had Live At the Electric on last week BBC3 and a man was there in an office with his pants down penis on show with foreskin pulled back...

Yes folks this year has been male genatalia year..Well ofcom states;

"Nudity has to be shown within context"well tv is taking the piss to the highest level this year and ofcom is breaking its own rules by allowing continuous onslaught of penises on uk tv..

I did not even think of penises on THIS morning programme Live At the Electric or Spartacus Blood and Sand i just had them on and all contained explicit male genatalia..

I got a reply back from BBFC on this topic and they say they do not distinguish between male and female nudity..Yes you fucking do the amount of videos with penises in is relentless even piranhna 3d and Inbetweeners have them (ok they are prosthetics)but if a fanny lip is shown us blokes have to to Private Shop.

P.S i know these are prosthetic penises but they dont even do prosthetic vaginas in dvd,s.

Yes lads lasses can tune into tv and see real penises closes up,semi erect,foreskins back the lot men get NOTHING...You weant to see a real liofe vagina its rape..Porn on the net and strip clubs or R18 are all false vaginas so how are men suppossed to see whats going on in real life vaginaland..

Suggestions welcome because even your other half only has one vagina these lasses are tuning into uk tv and seeing 100,s..

Ofcom is reponsible for this sexist act should be held to account but me and Eccles cant do it on our own...Eccles does the petition i do all the hundreds of emails..Mind you that repeat episode of Embarrassing Illnesess repeated at 7pm got 57 complaints with its explicit penis content so some others were disgusted..

I am seriously pissed off with just sat there with tv on and penis shoved in my fucking face seriously pissed off..I think Ed Richards is gay and if he is then he is been biased towards *@~*&* and should be removed under the sex discrmination act..


RE: Ofcom Discussion - sweetsugar007 - 14-07-2012 09:49

I have just returned from Italy where overnight in the hotel I had access to Sky Italia the same company as our own Sky Tv. It was very interesting to note in this very Religious of countries how liberal their own 900 channels were. For example Eurotic TV the same as ours have the girls walking around without panties and they have a camera specifically for the UK because of our rubbish laws.

There was no encryption no obvious censorship in place. The other channels on the 900's varied on themes from similar to ours to them masturbating with see thru knickers on.

It just showed how shit we have it here!!


RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 14-07-2012 10:26

Very interesting. I've also been to Italy and I think their children and teenagers are extremely polite and well-adjusted people. It's a joy to see them in restaurants with their families, quietly getting on with their meal and not screaming and misbehaving like they do in this country.

There's also no public disorder from young people, no binge drinking, no random knife attacks. There are obviously many social and cultural reasons that children in mainland Europe are so much better behaved than English children (I do think this is mainly an English problem rather than British) but the 900 channels cannot be a factor in this debate.

In mainland Europe, with less censorship, children and teenagers behave well and are obviously not 'harmed' by any exposure to erotic TV channels.

Here in this country, with draconian censorship of which Queen Victoria would have approved we have the highest rate of teenage pregnancy in Europe and a general culture of delinquency.

Why Ofcom keep using the 'protecting the children' card to justify their censorship I've no idea as it's a complete red herring.


RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 14-07-2012 11:26

(14-07-2012 10:26 )Digital Dave Wrote:  Very interesting. I've also been to Italy and I think their children and teenagers are extremely polite and well-adjusted people. It's a joy to see them in restaurants with their families, quietly getting on with their meal and not screaming and misbehaving like they do in this country.

There's also no public disorder from young people, no binge drinking, no random knife attacks. There are obviously many social and cultural reasons that children in mainland Europe are so much better behaved than English children (I do think this is mainly an English problem rather than British) but the 900 channels cannot be a factor in this debate.

In mainland Europe, with less censorship, children and teenagers behave well and are obviously not 'harmed' by any exposure to erotic TV channels.

Here in this country, with draconian censorship of which Queen Victoria would have approved we have the highest rate of teenage pregnancy in Europe and a general culture of delinquency.

Why Ofcom keep using the 'protecting the children' card to justify their censorship I've no idea as it's a complete red herring.
if you compare the pregnancy rate in this country to the likes of italy, spain and france it proves that adult tv has no bearings on what youngsters get up to , in fact i would argue the case that the less they see the more they get up to , not knowing the consequences , the outcome or taking responsibility !


RE: Ofcom Discussion - richpk - 16-07-2012 12:47

if a young teenage boy can masturbate happily in his bedroom every evening he will be less likely to be shagging around and teenage pregnancy rate would drop. i think this is part why the pregnancy rate for a country like Italy is so much lower than ours. plus, they are more open as families about discussing sex and love to their children


i know thats a very simplistic look on it, but has some merits I think you will agree


RE: Ofcom Discussion - dogman - 16-07-2012 18:25

Caught part of a program last year about teenagers,cant remember what the over all theme of the show was,but part of it showed them getting the parents of 14,15,16 year old boys and girls in to a room and showing them the sort of content they have on their mobiles,which I might add they shouldnt have access to,the shocked looks on the parents faces when they showed them the hard core stuff the teenagers had was quite a sight,also they asked the teenagers their attitude to adult content and most where not that bothered or shocked.Which brings me to my point,teenagers today have a different view of adult material from their parents,the same as my generation had from their parents,if they want to see it they will,and no amount of safeguards will stop them,in fact it has the reverse affect,and ofcom are worried about shows which are far from being classed as hardcore.Makes no sense to me.if they are that worried they want to start looking in the right direction.


RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 16-07-2012 18:36

(14-07-2012 09:49 )sweetsugar007 Wrote:  For example Eurotic TV the same as ours have the girls walking around without panties and they have a camera specifically for the UK because of our rubbish laws.

With regards to eurotic tv I think I'd better set the record straight here and point out that their is no distinction between any of the eurotic tv feeds, they are all exactly the same, the only difference being is that from 11PM to 3AM they are allowed to show full frontal nudity but as far as this channel being a flesh frenzy 24/7 that is very well wide of the mark. New censorship laws at the end of 2008 brought this channel into line. Currently we only get this show up until 11PM before all the good stuff is shown afterwards but eurotic is a shadow of it's former self with many on the continent angered by the decision for this channel to show the first hour of the nightshow to us UK SKY viewers also which has meant they have had to abide by our own current draconian ofcom rules. In the past when this show used to show the models in all their glory at any point of the day would this point really carry more weight to it.

With regards to the rest of the adult channels on offer in Italy and the rest of Europe yes you have a point and the sooner we are brought into line with the rest the better but it's going to take some time yet before our dreams become a reality but I'm more than sure that eventually this'll come true, I wish I could put a time scale on it but all we have left is hope and to see if any if this current petition is going to change things for the better.


RE: Ofcom Discussion - blackjaques - 16-07-2012 19:28

Makes you all wonder who is all this censorship designed to protect.

I think it's Ofcon themselves.