The UK Babe Channels Forum
Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 27-03-2014 18:45

Well first off I don't want to go out full attack on Rammy as I don't think its right to gang up on one member but what I will say is a lot of what Rammy posts he does bring it upon himself.

Would the forum be a lot duller without Rammy, ofcourse it would, to echoes the sentiments of bandwagon many of his bizarre posts over the years have provided me with many a chuckle. But yes when reading one of Rammy's posts every babe according to him seemed to have a great night, his views are consistent but they lack honesty.

I think we all have certain views and expectations of the shows but to say a babe has been poor that particular night is not in my opinion being disrespectful. Why shouldn't we post that if that's our true opinion. If the babe in question was being subjected to name calling or anything other along these lines that fitted the bill in that manner then ofcourse it would be disrespectful.

Mica for example for me has been very poor or late and if she read this I'd expect her to take it as constructive, its not insulting, its basically saying that I know she can do better because I've seen her when she's delivered. What this forum needs is balanced views, not any one member trying to be the dominant force Important


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Lotuseater - 27-03-2014 20:27

Gosh! I've been offline as sadly I have to work for a living, and just came back to see the heated debate.

Still haven't got an answer to the key question: Where and when did Billy insult a babe?

(here's a clue to the answer: he DIDN'T!!!!)

love and kisses to you all - handsome, ugly, pretty or even munters....oxoxxoxox


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 28-03-2014 00:01

(27-03-2014 18:45 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Well first off I don't want to go out full attack on Rammy as I don't think its right to gang up on one member but what I will say is a lot of what Rammy posts he does bring it upon himself.

Would the forum be a lot duller without Rammy, ofcourse it would, to echoes the sentiments of bandwagon many of his bizarre posts over the years have provided me with many a chuckle. But yes when reading one of Rammy's posts every babe according to him seemed to have a great night, his views are consistent but they lack honesty.

I think we all have certain views and expectations of the shows but to say a babe has been poor that particular night is not in my opinion being disrespectful. Why shouldn't we post that if that's our true opinion. If the babe in question was being subjected to name calling or anything other along these lines that fitted the bill in that manner then ofcourse it would be disrespectful.

Mica for example for me has been very poor or late and if she read this I'd expect her to take it as constructive, its not insulting, its basically saying that I know she can do better because I've seen her
when she's delivered. What this forum needs is balanced views, not any one member trying to be the dominant force Important

my posts lack honesty!!!!???? what a complete load of rubbish and NOT TRUE!!!! my posts on here are genuine and totally honest. also untrue to say that I think every babe has a good night. I only usually post comments about 5 or 6 babeshow babes shows each night that I think have been good, sometime more depending on what babes are on and what shows they do. and I genuinely and honestly think they have had a good night, but I don't post in every single babeshow babe's thread for each babe that was on that night

also complete load of rubbish and not true to say I like to be the dominant force on the forum and like being the centre of attention. that's not the sort of person I am. there are plenty of discussions on here that don't involve me

really don't like my honesty and integrity being questioned and challenged like this


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 28-03-2014 00:17

Rammy you always seem to go mental whenever something is posted that is too close to the truth Smile

(28-03-2014 00:10 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  wouldn't say the tease shows are 2 steps backwards and think there is a place for them on the nightshows. first of all because we get to see daybabes wearing a lot less than they do on the dayshows and being naughtier.

See what I mean, this is what you posted on the Studio66 Thread, there you have it, irrespective of the content delivered you seem more than content Cool


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 28-03-2014 00:24

rammy are there any models on studio 66 that you don't like? it's ok to criticize that channel or a model on that channel you think had a poor night occasionally


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Classic84 - 28-03-2014 00:53

Only place tease hours should be is 9pm - 10pm time slot and not longer!! or with S66 case 9.30pm - 10.30pm, I mean WTF does this babe channel have to be different? bladewave does not make it better! and after tease hours then it's onto proper nightshows Important so we get to see some tits and if we are lucky pussy too? Surprised forget 3 hours or more of non topless action and ass shaking and we still get see them wearing less in that hour Cool


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 28-03-2014 01:51

(28-03-2014 00:17 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Rammy you always seem to go mental whenever something is posted that is too close to the truth Smile

(28-03-2014 00:10 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  wouldn't say the tease shows are 2 steps backwards and think there is a place for them on the nightshows. first of all because we get to see daybabes wearing a lot less than they do on the dayshows and being naughtier.

See what I mean, this is what you posted on the Studio66 Thread, there you have it, irrespective of the content delivered you seem more than content Cool

I haven't gone mental at all in that post you've quoted from the s66 general chat thread. where have you got that from. you said that you thought that tease shows were 2 steps backwards to which I replied saying that tease shows weren't 2 steps backwards and said why I thought they weren't 2 steps backwards and didn't kick off in anyway in my reply.

as for being too close to the truth what I reacted too. presume you mean the truth according to scottishbloke and presumably the other forum members that don't like tease hours on s66 or any other channel

joey yes there are models on s66 I don't like. Ashley Emma is one even though from time to time she does do the occasional good show, but she's doing nothing for me tonight so I wont post in her threads about her show tonight. also I have criticised s66 in the past when it has had what I think is a poor night


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - jimmyt73 - 28-03-2014 02:33

(28-03-2014 00:53 )Classic84 Wrote:  Only place tease hours should be is 9pm - 10pm time slot and not longer!! or with S66 case 9.30pm - 10.30pm, I mean WTF does this babe channel have to be different? bladewave does not make it better! and after tease hours then it's onto proper nighthsows Important so we get to get some tits and if we are lucky pussy too? Surprised forget 3 hours or more of non topless action and ass shaking and we still get see them wearing less in that hour Cool
Totally agree Classic,tease show between 9pm and 10pm,after that if they wont go at the very least topless,regardless of highly regarded they are they should be offscreen by 10.05pm at the latest to make way for proper nightshow performers,also think call rates during first hour should be much cheaper and no oversized osgs cluttering up the screen,particularly ones which give the same info,also i dont like this current obsession with having a clock counting down virtually all the time.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 28-03-2014 03:47

It often feels more like a clock counting down to the next OSG rather than to a reappearance of an on screen babe Wink.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 30-03-2014 21:57

Still way too much lying or sitting on beds and desks going on.
There really does need to be much more imagination, energy and effort all round.
Same old routines every night are tired and tedious.
A bit of creativity and imagination should not be too much to ask Rolleyes.