+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 23-07-2012 10:59
I've just had a look at the latest Ofcom bulletin and noticed that there's no mention of the babe channels anywhere. Not one investigation pending. This has to be unprecedented, especially as Ofcom have left the channels alone for quite some time now.
In a way they've won this particular phase of the war as the channels have never been tamer. However, I don't think they're that tame as to not cause offence if people are desperate to be offended at two am. So why the lack of complaints?
Perhaps the channels have stopped grassing each other up? As we all know, the overwhelming majority of complaints are submitted by rival channels and not the public. Everyone here repeatedly asked them not to be so fucking stupid and to stop doing it. Perhaps they've finally seen sense.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shylok - 23-07-2012 15:50
You pipped me to the post Dave I was thinking exactly the same thing!
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/obb210/obb210.pdf
Way time to 'ramp up the filth' me thinks!
Shylok
RE: Ofcom Discussion - elroyticklestab - 23-07-2012 16:45
It's Beaver Time!!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - alexfury - 23-07-2012 17:13
(23-07-2012 16:45 )elroyticklestab Wrote: It's Beaver Time!!
i'd be happy to see some good old fashioned 2for1s
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 23-07-2012 17:23
Just had a look at the latest Ofcom bulletin my self and like Digital Dave says no babe channels are mentioned in the latest bulletin for being found in breach or not in breach or currently under investigation, not only that there has been no mention of complaints made to Ofcom about the babe shows that Ofcom have assessed but thought they were were not worth investigating. It seems a bit suspicious to me, what are Ofcom up to, are they trying to lull the channels into a false sense or security in the hope that they will push things so they can come down hard on them ? , the phrase "give someone enough rope to hang themselves" is maybe what Ofcom have in mind .
I think there is still 1 or 2 ongoing investigations that were mentioned in previous bulletins that have not yet been resolved, either for being in breach or not in breach, the Storm investigation is still ongoing i believe for something shown on the 18th of June , some times the investigation take many months .
RE: Ofcom Discussion - dan g 27 - 23-07-2012 17:33
It sounds like good news maybe the channels can get confidence from this and up the tempo up a bit. However, I hate to be the turd in the cake, but Digital Dave you pointed out the vast majority of complaints may have came from the channels themselves and now it appears this grassing up from each other has stopped. But we can't forget their is still a minority of ordinary people out there, who may have complained themselves to Ofcom against the Babe Channels. It sounds like potentially good news, but lets not get overly excited just yet and see if the channels up their performances in the next few weeks or months
RE: Ofcom Discussion - fedup1 - 23-07-2012 17:54
Someone is lying here,,ofcom do not watch programmes before they are shown..I have been watching ed richards interview (without punching a hole in my laptop)and he said he will leave it up to persons to complain about any breaches/rule breaks and ofcom will not pre-screen any content before showing on tv and never will.
Now channel 4 and 5 both say showing female genatalia in the same film as when showing penises breaks ofcoms rules..Now where does it say this ?? All i can find is nudity must be in context especially before the watershed etc..I cannot find as yet anywhere saying you cannot show female genatalia but willing to be proved wrong.
My daughter teenage nudist sex docu is back on More 4 11.05pm tuesday 24th July and yes i am going to write another stinking SEXIST email to channel4 and ofcom..As i say i will moan and harrass till i die these sexist morons are sexist and i am right..Iam then going to write again till i get an answer on when they are going to do a documentry on "My son the teenage nudist" and fill it full of female gentalia just cameras filming fannys and girls pulling their knickers down just like they do in"My daughter the teenage nudist."
There have been so many turn arounds this year about the budget and they are striking about milk at this moment and winning..Things change if we continue to complain but yet again I AM ON MY OWN.
If this time all 54,000 people on here complain about this highly sexist penis show MDTTN then maybe we can get something done. Haha i get no back up and one person cant change the world.At the end of the docu is even worse with men just pulling their pants down,fucking sexist and what the c~nting hell has it got to do with her daughter she is the nudist.
Oh just found out Stephen Gough was re-arrested on July 20th for breach of conditions,,thats cheered me up sick to back fucking teeth of penises am straight as a die and want to see fannys.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - oklahoma001 - 24-07-2012 02:44
(23-07-2012 15:50 )shylok Wrote: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/obb210/obb210.pdfThis is the first time I've read one of these bulletins so are "complaints not worth investigating" no big deal? You guys said theres no mention of any babechannels but isn't Elite Days listed with 1 complaint?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - The Silent Majority - 24-07-2012 04:37
(23-07-2012 17:54 )fedup Wrote: Some stuff
What I don't understand is, why are you watching all these programmes that are full of penises if you're so offended by them?
Aren't you doing exactly the same thing, in reverse, as the people who complain needlessly about the babechannels?
If you don't want to be offended then don't watch, simples!
If we use that argument in defence of the babechannels it's hypocritical to then go and do the same thing about other programming.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 24-07-2012 08:04
(24-07-2012 02:44 )oklahoma001 Wrote: This is the first time I've read one of these bulletins so are "complaints not worth investigating" no big deal? You guys said theres no mention of any babechannels but isn't Elite Days listed with 1 complaint?
You're right, well spotted. It was a single complaint regarding the 17th June broadcast. Whatever it was Ofcom decided not to take it further, which is good news.
With the babe channels there's no logic in what Ofcom decide to investigate. It seems to be done on a whim. Usually if they do investigate then there's 100% chance that the channel will be found to be in breach, so perhaps this complaint was so idiotic that Ofcom decided that even their kangaroo court wouldn't be able to make it stick.