RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Symbiont - 01-04-2016 03:14
(01-04-2016 00:55 )darren73 Wrote: Lucy Zara has gone for a break so they have put the COUGARS feed on FV
Sensible decision, don't you think?
Given it was a choice between Charmaine Sinclair and Elicia Solis, who would you have picked?
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - BarrieBF - 01-04-2016 04:21
(01-04-2016 01:10 )darren73 Wrote: (01-04-2016 01:05 )Censorship :-( Wrote: Have S66 been on FV before?
Yes I think it was in 2013 will have to check my fv recorder
No, it was 2011/12. Freeview channel 192.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Charlemagne - 01-04-2016 06:14
Happy 7th anniversary Studio66
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 01-04-2016 08:09
Jeez, I should have know better than to quote figures and miss off the sources.
I will look up the articles I was using (themselves referencing Ofcom data) and will post them later.
But I'd like to ask why it is that certain posters who look to have an appropriate knowledge are seemingly unwilling to post it as a frame for initial debate or discussion; instead apparently being more content with taking pot-shots at anyone else who attempts to do so.
Is it any wonder that that these threads are often lacking in any actual info?
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - teewee - 01-04-2016 08:23
(01-04-2016 08:09 )ShandyHand Wrote: Jeez, I should have know better than to quote figures and miss off the sources.
I will look up the articles I was using (themselves referencing Ofcom data) and will post them later.
But I'd like to ask why it is that certain posters look to have an appropriate knowledge are seemingly unwilling to post it as a frame for initial debate or discussion; instead apparently being more content with taking pot-shots at anyone else who attempts to do so.
Is it any wonder that that these threads are often lacking in any actual info?
Anytime someone tries to contribute and start a discussion,there are others who will deride and belittle their post.
This is just a general observation,and not aimed at any individual.
All to often,on this forum,threads descend into name calling,and sensible debate and discussion goes out of the window.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - terence - 01-04-2016 08:35
(01-04-2016 08:23 )teewee Wrote: All to often,on this forum,threads descend into name calling,and sensible debate and discussion goes out of the window.
Err, no it doesn't. It happens very occasionally, but hardly 'all to often'. About normal for a high traffic forum I'd say.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - steviebaby - 01-04-2016 08:40
(31-03-2016 14:58 )HEX!T Wrote: (31-03-2016 08:13 )steviebaby Wrote: (31-03-2016 07:49 )babelover48 Wrote: well let's face it St66 probably see Ella as being a top performer in their eyes
can only assume she has a load of fanboys who constantly throw money at her.
no mate a load of callers do, ella is popular on the phones and while visually boring because of the repetative nature of her shows and her unwillingness to go nude, she kills it on the phone.
Thanks for the info. I had a sneaking suspicion that might be the case.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - steviebaby - 01-04-2016 08:57
The recent moves by S66 don't make sense. Why change format to a pervecam-dominated tv feed that only shows the top half of the babe and then broadcast one channel on FV. The two are incompatible.
Unless they are going to use an extra channel, it means that sky 912 (which is the channel I assume will be broadcast on FV) will have to be a traditional viewing format as it would be folly to try heads-only on FV, no one would watch/phone.
At least it means that we won't be lumbered with all their output being head close-ups.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 01-04-2016 09:49
(01-04-2016 08:09 )ShandyHand Wrote: But I'd like to ask why it is that certain posters who look to have an appropriate knowledge are seemingly unwilling to post it as a frame for initial debate or discussion; instead apparently being more content with taking pot-shots at anyone else who attempts to do so.
Narcissistic personality disorder
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - teewee - 01-04-2016 10:10
(01-04-2016 08:35 )terence Wrote: (01-04-2016 08:23 )teewee Wrote: All to often,on this forum,threads descend into name calling,and sensible debate and discussion goes out of the window.
Err, no it doesn't. It happens very occasionally, but hardly 'all to often'. About normal for a high traffic forum I'd say.
Sorry,poor choice of words.I accept"all to often" was inaccurate.
|