+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - dogman - 11-04-2014 15:28
The Cam site;s must be rubbing their hands in glee at the dire state of most of these channels,they should of had the guts to fight Ofcom a long time ago,now they are paying the price.Tame shows,the same tired poor line ups,slowly but surely losing the battle.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - KerrAvon - 11-04-2014 16:57
(10-04-2014 23:03 )Rammyrascal Wrote: couple of good posts snookered. no real disagreement with what your saying.
Well you've changed your tune from the 'channels are no way as bad as some are making out'
They are that indeed. Once upon a time you couldn't go to bed early even if you wanted to, as babeshows were so teasing & erotic they were keeping you up (& hard). Nowadays whenever I get a chance to watch, it's a disappointing flick through the channels & switch over to a film, boxset or PS3.
What's even more worrying is that even my favourite & better babes who know how to please can't fully save things either. More often than not, they're too hamstrung by the producers.
And if you can't even get punters watching, they certainly not going to get then turned on to call. They surely can't keep cost cutting or lowering call costs to compensate forever?
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 11-04-2014 17:12
don't think so myself, I didn't say I fully agree with what snookered had said. I still stand by that point, that the babeshows are not as bad as some forum members say they are. I was agreeing with what snookered said after that about the babechannels and some of the babeshow babes that work on them.
agree the channels can only go so far with cost cutting and lowering call costs and still think that the channels will eventually disappear off sky and go online to escape the Ofcom rules and also because an increasing number of people watch tv via smartphones, tablets and pc's and not in front of the tv. also think it's probably cheaper to just be online only
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 11-04-2014 17:13
(11-04-2014 16:57 )KerrAvon Wrote: They are that indeed. Once upon a time you couldn't go to bed early even if you wanted to, as babeshows were so teasing & erotic they were keeping you up (& hard).
And if you can't even get punters watching, they certainly not going to get then turned on to call.
Nail on head hit
.The consistent eroticism and intensity has all but gone.
Fleeting glimpses are as good as it gets now.
There is less motivation to call because there is no excitement.
The spice has gone, the variety has gone and the thrill has definitely gone.
A great show has now turned into a rare special treat rather than a regular occurrence.
Yes OFCOM has a lot to do with it but so does the culture of these channels.
Self defeatism has kicked in. Resigned to the idea that only the occasional bit of daring magic is really acceptable. Let's take every opportunity to bash other channels and do as little horny stuff as possible to just about stop the ship of nightshow interest completely sinking
.Everybody at the channels needs a kick up the backside.
Don't all sit there waving a combination of white flags and phones
.You have the capability to produce something great even within the current rules.
Get off your arses and try some wild and wacky things.
The capability is there but is the will?
Come on everyone, wake up from your slumbers. You might even accidentally over stimulate yourselves in the process
.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - SYBORG666 - 11-04-2014 17:16
The evidence is how many of the regular members have either left or very rarely post (me included) because before all the rules the babeshows were so unpredictable that it kept you hooked but now it's just too predictable due to the over cautious producers and camera crew.
Kerravon and snookered have hit the nail on the head.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 11-04-2014 17:55
(11-04-2014 17:12 )Rammyrascal Wrote: agree the channels can only go so far with cost cutting and lowering call costs and still think that the channels will eventually disappear off sky and go online to escape the Ofcom rules and also because an increasing number of people watch tv via smartphones, tablets and pc's and not in front of the tv. also think it's probably cheaper to just be online only
I don't think going online only would let UK based babe channels escape all UK regulation/Ofcom rules, it would probably be cheaper to go online only but my guess is the call volumes would drop off.
Without TV publicity to promote the babe channels the current channels would struggle to survive in the same format imo
Also if like you say a increasing number of people watch TV via smart phones, tablets and PC's and not in front of the telly, then they wouldn't be able to do that if it wasn't on the telly .
Digital Dave made this post and gave a link concerning Ofcom's/ATVOD's regulation of the internet, it was originally posted in another thread and was in response to me thinking ATVOD regulated live phone in internet only babe shows, iv'e edited it to just leave the relevant info in the post .
(06-11-2013 15:00 )Digital Dave Wrote: The question of who regulates internet live broadcasts was a grey area but Ofcom now cover it.
ATVOD do not regulate live web broadcasts, only Video On Demand, which by definition is not live. The 'TV like' clause is not relevant, if you read their guidance in detail.
http://www.atvod.co.uk/uploads/files/Guidance_on_who_needs_to_notify_Ed_3.3_May_2013.pdf
Section 2:
2.17 A content service that is broadcast or streamed in a linear form is not covered by the
on-demand programme service rules, and may be subject to the relevant ‘broadcast’
regulation. It should be noted that the rules for broadcast regulation are explicitly
extended by the Directive and the Act to cover internet-based television channels.
The underlined section clearly states that internet TV channels are now covered by the broadcasting act, i.e. Ofcom.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 11-04-2014 18:04
(11-04-2014 17:12 )Rammyrascal Wrote: don't think so myself, I didn't say I fully agree with what snookered had said. I still stand by that point, that the babeshows are not as bad as some forum members say they are. I was agreeing with what snookered said after that about the babechannels and some of the babeshow babes that work on them.yeah but you have low standards of what a nightshow should be like rammy you don't even care if a babe doesn't go topless on a nightshow and you are easily pleased by the channels, esp studio 66
personally even though i think the babeshows are a shadow of their former selves and a lot of my fave babes have gone, i'd rather have the babechannels to watch no matter how shit they are, than have no babe channels at all, does that make me a sad bastard? one day all this will end though, if the babechannels are still around in 20-30 years time by then Lori will be on goldengirls, hopefully Tori is too
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 11-04-2014 18:21
Perhaps in 30 years the daughters of our fave babes will be on bs
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 12-04-2014 06:45
(11-04-2014 18:21 )Tractor boy Wrote: Perhaps in 30 years the daughters of our fave babes will be on bs
Let us hope there is more to look forward to in 30 years time than revised techniques in phone waving and pic plugging
.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Doddle - 12-04-2014 07:22
People will be moaning that BS should be using its ultra-liberal Martian licence more than they do...