+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - The realXFactor - 04-08-2012 21:46
(02-08-2012 10:01 )shankey! Wrote: if the channels cant even mediate with ofcom what chance do we have ?,apart from babestation i dont think any of the other channels have dared crossing that line , yet its not as if they are going to be penalised for questioning a rule or decision , i actually think that this may be the way forward,if a suggestion was put forward by a channel asking permission for a more tolerant approach to a show aired at lets say 1 am who knows what they would say, we will never know until its tried , i would love a 5 minute free for all every hour after 1 , within moderation of coarse,
yep, and the coarser it is the better I like it
RE: Ofcom Discussion - fedup1 - 06-08-2012 18:43
Thanks to all those who have emailed oftwats..It might not seem much but this government has done uturn after uturn thanks to the folk on the street complaining and protesting..As to why female genatalia is so taboo on uk tv is my next barrage of emails to those involved..I have a feeling its oftwats who allowed erections to be shown on tv after never,ever,ever allowing one on uk tv since tv was invented,yet the fucking cunts dont allow female genitals.I want an answer as to why because BBFC and my doc do NOT differentiate ..
So the only people on planet Earth who have a problem with female genatalia is the sexist "NO VALID REASON" IDIOTS WHO WORK AT OFTWATS.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 13-08-2012 10:22
I've just seen the latest Ofcom bulletin and once again the babe channels are free and clear!
There were three complaints against Playboy in July, all of which were assessed and not investigated.
This really is extraordinary. I wonder if it's because the channels are currently so tame or does it represent a change of attitude at Ofcom?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - jimmyt73 - 13-08-2012 11:43
(13-08-2012 10:22 )Digital Dave Wrote: I've just seem the latest Ofcom bulletin and once again the babe channels are free and clear!
There were three complaints against Playboy in July, all of which were assessed and not investigated.
This really is extraordinary. I wonder if it's because the channels are currently so tame or does it represent a change of attitude at Ofcom?
unfortuneatly i think your right because almost all of the adult content we enjoyed has been banned and until the viewers/callers start to vote with their wallets and stop calling the girls the bosses of the channels are unlikely to fight for less stringent rules regarding their output
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 13-08-2012 12:15
hardly surprising when you think that some of the girls are not even topless at 11 some nights,the double pair of knickers brigade is present most of the time ,as well as the regular statue models who just about manage to breath in and out , us men must be thick as shit to sit there night after night for a second of something what never happens ,i sure wouldnt waste any money on a call to them no more!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - fedup1 - 13-08-2012 12:47
I am tending to think its because the shows are so lame/timid that nothing much happens now..I have mentioned before that i only have freeview but some girls are their most nights covered up.I remember when they used to make mistakes (perhaps on purpose )but now if something is going to happen the cameras move out of shot like shit off a hot shovel.
I dont know if i have said this before but i paid once or twice for BABESTAION EXTREME..I DONT CONDONE PAYING FOR IT WHEN FEMALES CAN SEE MALE GENATALIA FREE ON ALL CHANNELS ANY TIME OF DAY..Anyhow they showed plenty of female genatalia but no penises or erections..Its so weird to see it from how women see it I.E. only female genitals on screen and no male..Like how i go on about stuff instead they cut away from penis shots and erections were well hidden..
How weird is that,,it felt like even tho it was defo over 18 paid for PIN protection they did not allow erections..It was as if i was in some unsexist world or utopia..
I see the E-Petion has shot up..
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shylok - 13-08-2012 15:30
Its because there so fucking weak atm mate.
Don't read anything positive into it.
Cheers
Shylok
(13-08-2012 10:22 )Digital Dave Wrote: I've just seen the latest Ofcom bulletin and once again the babe channels are free and clear!
There were three complaints against Playboy in July, all of which were assessed and not investigated.
This really is extraordinary. I wonder if it's because the channels are currently so tame or does it represent a change of attitude at Ofcom?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 13-08-2012 17:58
I also happen to agree, if the channels were going for it big style and they were ofcom complaint free then sure it would be cause for celebration. In many ways this latest bulletin actually encourages the channels to remain this tame, I know it sounds strange but if Ofcom went all guns blazing against the channels like they have in the past then we might just see a reaction but yes when you have to wait until at least midnight to see any kind of nudity and with it very weak it's no great surprise that recent shows have passed without incidence
RE: Ofcom Discussion - elroyticklestab - 13-08-2012 21:32
Ofcom look like they have won judging by the last week's output. RLC are the only channel with anything like decent output.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 13-08-2012 22:35
As I said on another thread, the cynic in me wonders if it is all a ploy to avoid seeming repressive during the Olympics period when an international audience might make comparisons with China.
If the comparison were like for like I might be celebrating but much of the content is so tame these days its difficult to see what anyone could complain about or what Ofcom could uphold.
Also bear in mind it is August and the civil service pretty much shuts down for the month while staff take 2 week hols.
Was watching one of the comedy channels earlier an a trailer suddenly splashed Keith Lemmons arse all over the screen.
One thing this is interesting in the latest Bulletin is the Not In Breach finding for Ho[m]eland. It featured a chase sex scene at 9:07 with no below the waist nudity. Despite the proximity to the watershed that was found not in breach. Offensive language in the opening credits was not in breach either.