+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Storm (/forumdisplay.php?fid=115)
+---- Thread: Storm - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=32660)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - steviebaby - 28-12-2014 00:40
(27-12-2014 23:48 )Name Change Wrote: what do you expect from a channel whose camera operators write reports about the on-screen talent describing them as "slow and shit". If they think that, what are we supposed to feel?
Just form your own opinions with your own eyes.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 28-12-2014 18:50
(27-12-2014 23:48 )Name Change Wrote: what do you expect from a channel whose camera operators write reports about the on-screen talent describing them as "slow and shit". If they think that, what are we supposed to feel?
btw, dicksplash says "Just form your own opinions with your own eyes" or something redundant and preachy like that.
Are those reports available?
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - SteveHG - 29-12-2014 00:57
I wonder whether we sometimes criticise channels like Storm for not being something they can't be i.e. one of the bigger channels.
I haven't been able to watch much of Storm as I only have web access at the moment (yes, that IS a failing of the channel) so depend on people kindly posting caps & vids on here. From what I've seen though they seem to have a pretty good selection of girls and some damn good shows. Yes, the picture quality isn't great, the sets are a bit dull and they should have a web stream but maybe that's missing the point?
I'd liken them a bit to the Nationwide or lower football leagues, whose clubs can develop and showcase new talent for the bigger clubs, and also provide work for players who still have talent but are no longer willing or able to play in the Premier division. Some of the games might look a scrappy, but they're often more thrilling than the boring matches played by expensive foreign Premier imports.
As such I think it would be a shame if we lost this last channel just because it can't compete directly with the likes of BS/S66/RLC who at the moment seem to be aping the Premier division by desperately stealing babes off each other whilst also grassing each other up at every opportunity. Wouldn't we better encouraging more small players like Storm rather than slagging off the very few remaining ones?
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 29-12-2014 02:11
We have to praise them for the good and be critical when they messed up it's the same rules for every channel.
Storm have great girls but rubbish production.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 29-12-2014 04:55
SteveHG the way you describe storms place in the word i think is spot on,
with out a channel like storm to pick up the peaces as it where when it goes wrong for a girl they are just going to get lost to the shows, i see reading this thread some what them to keep signing names to push on but not everyone can be Man Utd some should settle for being Bristol Rovers and be happy with there lot as it don't mean they can't make money
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - steviebaby - 29-12-2014 12:46
(27-12-2014 23:48 )Name Change Wrote: what do you expect from a channel whose camera operators write reports about the on-screen talent describing them as "slow and shit". If they think that, what are we supposed to feel?
btw, dicksplash says "Just form your own opinions with your own eyes" or something redundant and preachy like that.
Ouch man, you're just too sharp for me!
"Preachy", really?
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - steviebaby - 29-12-2014 12:51
(27-12-2014 23:48 )Name Change Wrote: what do you expect from a channel whose camera operators write reports about the on-screen talent describing them as "slow and shit". If they think that, what are we supposed to feel?
You don't say where these reports are or where they come from. Have you not considered they may be from a disaffected employee, or even ex-employee? Or even one with a beef against one or more of the girls, perhaps they won't let him f*** them?!
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Forum Style - 30-12-2014 00:11
(29-12-2014 12:46 )steviebaby Wrote: "Preachy", really?
It sounded to me like you were telling people what to do, which would count as "preachy" to me. But I've seen enough kick-offs on this forum to admire when someone takes the higher road, hence the rep. As for the reports - no, I don't believe they are publicly available.
Now if you'll excuse me abandoning a discussion, I don't want to use up my 5,000th post on here.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - steviebaby - 30-12-2014 00:26
(30-12-2014 00:11 )Name Change Wrote:(29-12-2014 12:46 )steviebaby Wrote: "Preachy", really?Now if you'll excuse me abandoning a discussion, I don't want to use up my 5,000th post on here.
LOL
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 30-12-2014 00:47
There is good chemistry tonight