RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 10-09-2016 21:52
(10-09-2016 16:57 )shankey! Wrote: i actually think babestation has had some kind of reprimand off ofcom , the shows are the tamest ive ever seen them since watching from the early days before they were allowed to go topless ,considering some of the tv shows now aired after the watershed at ten babestation should be allowed to broadcast on freeview during childrens hour
It's just a guess on my part, but that seems highly unlikely; as far as I can see, the dramatic decline in 2016 has come about because of commercial decisions by the broadcaster, such that the traditional 'shows', and their callers, appear to be of little or no interest to them any more - presumably, the 'big money' is in pervcam et al.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - babemaniac - 11-09-2016 01:19
(10-09-2016 21:52 )Censorship :-( Wrote: (10-09-2016 16:57 )shankey! Wrote: i actually think babestation has had some kind of reprimand off ofcom , the shows are the tamest ive ever seen them since watching from the early days before they were allowed to go topless ,considering some of the tv shows now aired after the watershed at ten babestation should be allowed to broadcast on freeview during childrens hour
It's just a guess on my part, but that seems highly unlikely; as far as I can see, the dramatic decline in 2016 has come about because of commercial decisions by the broadcaster, such that the traditional 'shows', and their callers, appear to be of little or no interest to them any more - presumably, the 'big money' is in pervcam et al.
I think you are probably within range with that guess...its commercial!! We dont matter a fuck and they simply want to get that easy peasy money!! I mean we all accpet its a business and they need to make profits but they should at least provide a good standard of product surely... Alas all our rants will ultimately amount to nothing so whats the point lets just watch old re runs and accept the channels are dead!! Well done BS and a the rest of em
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 11-09-2016 02:04
(11-09-2016 01:19 )babemaniac Wrote: (10-09-2016 21:52 )Censorship :-( Wrote: (10-09-2016 16:57 )shankey! Wrote: i actually think babestation has had some kind of reprimand off ofcom , the shows are the tamest ive ever seen them since watching from the early days before they were allowed to go topless ,considering some of the tv shows now aired after the watershed at ten babestation should be allowed to broadcast on freeview during childrens hour
It's just a guess on my part, but that seems highly unlikely; as far as I can see, the dramatic decline in 2016 has come about because of commercial decisions by the broadcaster, such that the traditional 'shows', and their callers, appear to be of little or no interest to them any more - presumably, the 'big money' is in pervcam et al.
I think you are probably within range with that guess...its commercial!! We dont matter a fuck and they simply want to get that easy peasy money!! I mean we all accpet its a business and they need to make profits but they should at least provide a good standard of product surely... Alas all our rants will ultimately amount to nothing so whats the point lets just watch old re runs and accept the channels are dead!! Well done BS and a the rest of em
Yep, so long as the 'cash cow' that is pervcam keeps doing the business, no hope for the 'TV show', I'm afraid. Absolutely dire.
More than ever, it's soooo disappointing that so many of the old shows are no longer available, thanks to various upload sites going down.
Guess I'll just have to dig out my own recordings from years gone by, as there is increasingly little on today's 'shows' worth bothering with.
Talking of old shows, it's amazing how much better even something as 'tame' as Party People was compared to today's shows. In fact, the day show back then was more overtly sexual than much of today's 'night shows'!?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 11-09-2016 02:11
(10-09-2016 12:43 )snookered147 Wrote: (10-09-2016 12:18 )Censorship :-( Wrote: ^ It seems to be a race to the bottom, at the moment: S66 'normalised' DBS earlier this year, then it was prevcam that further ruined the 'TV shows'; Lamestation (they've gone waaaayyy beyond Tamestation, now ) has followed suit, but has gone even further with Slavecam ( © mrmann ), and have now strayed into Xpanded territory with TBS!?
At this point, you might ask 'Can it get any worse?', but with these numpties, that would merely be seen as a challenge for them to accept!
Quadruple babe stint pervcam on a cramped bed set with a half screen OSG on a rolling 5 second challenge .
I've said it before, and I'll say it again - Lamestation head producer, right there!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Doddle - 11-09-2016 07:11
Nice of BS to cater for insomniacs last night
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 11-09-2016 08:36
Insomniacs, and thanks to the two minute challenge, premature ejaculators as well.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 11-09-2016 08:42
always thought ejaculation was a cure for insomnia
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - davetherave57 - 11-09-2016 19:58
Oh For The Gimmick Free Days Of Old, When It Didnt Cost An Arm And A Leg! £4.50 for Pics/Vids, £5/£8 For A Supposed 'Porn' Channel, And Now The In Word Is 'Pervcam' Where You might get a glimpse of a brucie bonus (if you play your cards of the credit kind right)... The 2 Minute Challenge where they keep you on hold for 3 times that then cut you off if you come or not within the stated time. Whats the point of the POV when the girls cant show the point of view we want to see.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 12-09-2016 21:16
Was looking forward to tonight until I saw Charley Green on with Alice.
She's going to be the one who ruins sessions by tagging alongside the other women, and them not being allowed to go nude because of it.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 13-09-2016 00:37
Gimmicks? On Lamestation? Surely not...
|