Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Rammyrascal - 29-08-2012 07:36 its cause the babechannels are classifed as teleshopping channels is why they cant swear. something like that RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 29-08-2012 10:00 (29-08-2012 06:45 )Shawnwilson Wrote: Another thing im interested in is, why are the channels sticking to the no swearing on the mic policy, when ive been told that its legal after a certain time at night?. We already discussed this! http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=18626&pid=1110266#pid1110266 RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 29-08-2012 10:39 a hell of a lot of criticism has been fired at the channels of late,but from what i can make of it myself is they dont give a fuck what we are saying on here otherwise they would at least get the reps to fight their corner as to the reasons why the shows are so up and down , ofcom is again at the centre of it all but not all the blame can be just down to them,how can you justify putting a show on one night with danni harwood doing her best and follow it the night after with a model in statuesque mode and still in her bra after midnight ?this has to be down to the shows themselves , the summer is almost over yet i have not witnessed anything to resemble it in any sets or themes , bath time and shower sections are all be extinct and the 2 for ones are a total waste of time , ive recently read on here what happened just after bangbabes demise and new rules came in, the shows were shitting themselves in case ofcom came knocking on their door but the shows even then were better than now, its not as if any of them have had a severe reprimand for breach by ofcom so what is their reason or excuse ?come on here and at least explain yourselves is what i am asking them all RE: Ofcom Discussion - shylok - 29-08-2012 12:14 Well put shankey. For my two penneth I find it really hard to grasp how little the babe channels do about fighting their own corner. It's like they've hit their 'sales target' and just don't give a fuck anymore. They have no comprehension about developing the business. Another thing that pisses me off massively is the shear contempt they treat us with. The only way to get the lazy bastards off their arse's is for them to start loosing a lot of money. Why should we should we be fighting so hard for them if they don't give a fuck themselves? Also, why don't the cunts reps come on here and share their issues? Everything is so secretive in Babe Channel-land... Pathetic. Fuck em I say... */rant off* Shylok RE: Ofcom Discussion - Shawnwilson - 29-08-2012 12:20 I know we have had the swearing on the mic debate dave, but I have been told by a person who works on one of the channels via twitter that its legal after a certain time. there's no argument on this surely?? p.s I agree with alot of what you say dave. RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 29-08-2012 13:43 (29-08-2012 12:20 )Shawnwilson Wrote: I know we have had the swearing on the mic debate dave, but I have been told by a person who works on one of the channels via twitter that its legal after a certain time. there's no argument on this surely?? It doesn't look like the babe channels are allowed to use strong sexual explicit language at any time , Elite TV were found in breach for letting their girls use explicit language on the mic , this was detailed in a Ofcom bulletin that came out on the 08/11/10 (issue number 169), PrimeTime TV the owners of Elite were found in breach for their girls using sexual explicit language on 2 separate dates , one was for what the girls said on the mic beetween the hours of 22:00 to 22:14 on one date and the other was at 00:30 on another date, Elite conceded this shouldn't have been allowed and offered Ofcom their sincere apologies for airing this content, Elite blamed a inexperienced producer and informed Ofcom that they had removed the producer that let this happen from their employment . RE: Ofcom Discussion - Shawnwilson - 29-08-2012 14:07 I also recall the elite tv swearing fine, but that did involve the word 'r#pe' which is stronger than normal swear words. Also like ive said previously, someone working on the channels has told me it is legal. Plus if you don't believe that, why would ofcom allow television x to show 10 minute freeviews on freeview every single night full of swearing? Both are sex channels. RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 29-08-2012 14:24 (29-08-2012 14:07 )Shawnwilson Wrote: I also recall the elite tv swearing fine, but that did involve the word 'r#pe' which is stronger than normal swear words. Also like ive said previously, someone working on the channels has told me it is legal. Plus if you don't believe that, why would ofcom allow television x to show 10 minute freeviews on freeview every single night full of swearing? Both are sex channels. The encrypted channels that broadcast strong language on their 10min freeviews throughout the night are not classed by Ofcom as teleshopping channels , the free to air babe channels operate under teleshopping rules, according to Ofcom the free to air babe channels because they are classed as teleshoppng have less leeway in language explicit content etc , this imo is absolutely stupid , like you say on the encrypted channels freeview sections the girls are allowed to use explicit sexual language , so what's the difference ? they are both advertising something , it's just Ofcom being vindictive towards the free to air phone in babe channels imo . RE: Ofcom Discussion - munch1917 - 29-08-2012 15:08 (29-08-2012 14:07 )Shawnwilson Wrote: I also recall the elite tv swearing fine, but that did involve the word 'r#pe' which is stronger than normal swear words. Also like ive said previously, someone working on the channels has told me it is legal. Plus if you don't believe that, why would ofcom allow television x to show 10 minute freeviews on freeview every single night full of swearing? Both are sex channels. Firstly, it doesn't matter a jot if 'someone working on the channels' told you, doesn't matter if a high court judge told you, or the damn Queen for that matter. Ofcom make and apply the rules no-one else, it only matters whether they say it's allowed or not, and the fact is they don't, they make it crystal clear that explicit language is a no-no. Secondly, as stated already the babe channels are classed by Ofcom as shopping channels, as their main purpose is to advertise their phonelines. TelevisionX is not classed as such, so the rules that apply are different. You may disagree with that, but that's how Ofcom see it, and once again, they are judge jury and executioner here. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Shawnwilson - 29-08-2012 15:25 I would totally agree with your statement munch, had this guy hadn't said what he said. I can't see him plucking out of thin air, to make me happy. I will try and push him on it, and get back to you. Anything's better than 'naughty' 'filthy' every gord dam night!! Lol. P.s I do phone, I just want recorded stuff with more fruity language on it! |