RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 10-01-2017 19:02
(10-01-2017 18:38 )grantorino Wrote: It says the complaint was assessed but is not being investigated
Quite right. Serves me right for posting in haste. I have amended the wording in my op.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - BarrieBF - 10-01-2017 21:51
(10-01-2017 13:19 )terence Wrote: we can get back the the filthy shows babestation were doing before this complaint!
The complaint doesn't appear to have been about the level of filth on view. More likely it was someone claiming to have been misled.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Dave_A - 11-01-2017 12:31
(10-01-2017 21:51 )BarrieBF Wrote: (10-01-2017 13:19 )terence Wrote: we can get back the the filthy shows babestation were doing before this complaint!
The complaint doesn't appear to have been about the level of filth on view. More likely it was someone claiming to have been misled.
The Ofcom investigation was put in the category "Participation TV-Harm" .
I have no idea what the complaint was about, but the category it was in doesn't seem to indicate they were investigating someone being misled .
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - prince henry sinclair - 11-01-2017 17:59
Was it someone complaining that they were confused or misled by the Dannii Harwood catch up broadcasts?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - trains55 - 12-01-2017 09:24
Morning all. I have a question. I know that the dreaded pervcam is taking over the shows unfortunately BUT I'm just wondering how Babestation stand when like last night Ashley on Babenation at 10.30ish had her pants off (for pervcam) and although we didn't see her full screen naked it was obvious from bumshots (LOVELY!) that she was fully naked WELL BEFORE 11.00! I would have thought that naked was naked whatever or is there a loophole that BS are exploiting!? Thanks.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 12-01-2017 09:39
I would love to exploit Ashley Emma's loophole.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - BarrieBF - 12-01-2017 10:09
(11-01-2017 17:59 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: Was it someone complaining that they were confused or misled by the Dannii Harwood catch up broadcasts?
That's a distinct possibility.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Dave_A - 12-01-2017 12:35
(12-01-2017 10:09 )BarrieBF Wrote: (11-01-2017 17:59 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: Was it someone complaining that they were confused or misled by the Dannii Harwood catch up broadcasts?
That's a distinct possibility.
Would Ofcom put such a complaint in their Participation TV "Harm" category, like this complaint was ? .
Also the incident took place on Meet The Babes on the 28/10.2016, i have a full recording from midnight to 5.30 am on that date and no Dannni Harwood catch up was broadcast, although one could have been broadcast i suppose the following evening on this date before 12am, , i have no recording of what was shown before midnight on that show on that date .
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - ceasman - 15-01-2017 22:24
Any idea why they are keeping tops on til after 22.15 but other channels are doing the usual times? Another babestation made rule , they are so compliant it's boring !
When did they last do anything risky, all of their girls self censor and the ones that don't get very few shifts meanimg were stuck with Lori, Maddie, Preeti! Ashley, Dannii, priya and Beth most nights
Yawn yawn
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - lenny10 - 16-01-2017 01:16
It would be nice a few times when flick. Alexa or Nicole is on they could have a bed to themselves instead of the Same people always
|