Studio66 USA - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236) +---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255) +----- Forum: Studio 66 USA (/forumdisplay.php?fid=332) +----- Thread: Studio66 USA - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=60673) |
RE: Studio66 USA - Chat & Discussion - oldboy1047 - 14-06-2014 06:46 sorry I won't be watching.I'd rather have good home grown talent any day than so called US porn stars RE: Studio66 USA - Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 14-06-2014 08:59 I gave it 5 mins anyway, I think that's fair RE: Studio66 USA - Chat & Discussion - lovebabes56 - 14-06-2014 09:16 I thought it was a good 1st from what I saw and the line up looks good for the next few days but would like to see how many more sets will be created in future. RE: Studio66 USA - Chat & Discussion - SteveHG - 14-06-2014 09:18 Can someone explain to me what's the special attraction of pornstars doing the same sort of tame shows that everybody is forced to do nowadays due to Ofcon? For me The US pornstars aren't particularly good looking compared to homegrown talent, and the fact they do (or have done) porn doesn't necessarily make them filthier or better on the phones. I can see why S66 may feel the need to do something different given the number of girls they seem to be losing, but there seems to me a risk (a bit like England footballers and the Premier League) that with a dedicated USA channel there will be even fewer opportunities for UK girls willing and able to work for S66. RE: Studio66 USA - Chat & Discussion - Jay39 - 14-06-2014 09:23 Well after the hype, all I can say is utter shite, never heard of Allie Haze, picture quality worse than Ladyboy TV and that's from Thailand. I gave up after she put another pair of knickers on to join the xxxpanded crew, but to be honest even those channels are better than this, picture kept freezing, teething problems me arse, they've had plenty of time to sort it's just down to piss poor equipment. If this is the alternative to home grown talent who put on far better shows then it's down hill from here, I'd be surprised if this venture lasts till the end of the year, she never looked busy to me. I think if anymore girls jump ship then S66 will be lucky to find a life boat remaining to save them. RE: Studio66 USA - Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 14-06-2014 09:26 Total tripe if you ask me. RE: Studio66 USA - Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 14-06-2014 10:35 (14-06-2014 09:16 )babelover48 Wrote: I thought it was a good 1st from what I saw and the line up looks good for the next few days but would like to see how many more sets will be created in future. agree babelover48. I thought s66usa did well on it's first night and have no real complaints about it and im looking forward to see how it goes over the next few days and overall still think it will be a success. SteveHG, the attraction of having pornstars on is that you can call them and interact with them unlike when you are watching them in one of their films RE: Studio66 USA - Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 14-06-2014 13:36 To take a channel and pass it over to the American girls whilst for whatever reason ours walk out the door? Patriot people will hate this, that's the first thing, unpatriotic people won't give a shit and base opinion purely on the quality of shows. So basically imo, these Porn Stars need to be fucking amazing, they need to live up to all the hype and expectation. Otherwise it's all just pointless, gimmicky bullshit that changes nothing.....except reducing the amount of British girls on the line-up of course RE: Studio66 USA - Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 14-06-2014 13:58 i take it patriotic people are not a fan of Lilly Roma then and are happy she has left S66 Studio 66 USA is a crock of shit though RE: Studio66 USA - Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 14-06-2014 14:33 (14-06-2014 08:59 )Bandwagon Wrote: I gave it 5 mins anyway, I think that's fair As much as that? |