The UK Babe Channels Forum
Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394

RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 05-09-2012 02:23

Yes Rammy I get what you and Dan are pointing out. But isn't that just stating the obvious and posting for the sake of posting. The sky is blue, I don't need anybody to tell me that when I can see it for myself. This discussion is about ofcom related issues. Fair enough if anybodys got any points they wish to bring to the table, then fine, post away Smile

Now on the Issue with regards to Maria Miller wanting more equality for women here is something that occurred to me. With the current ofcom rules and regulations in place the models working on the channel's could face the sack if they were to accidentally flash the gash. Surely this must be addressed why the vagina is deemed so offensive anyway in the first place. Weren't women in the 60's burning their bra's in the name of women's lib. Maybe now in 2012 we could have the same scenario repeated, only this time with the knickers Shy

RE: Ofcom Discussion - elroyticklestab - 05-09-2012 06:51

After last night's ultra tame output - we are back to the two pairs of knickers farce again - I fear we are pissing into the wind in light grey trousers.....we can slag them all we like but the channels are playing their game and not listening to the customers. When a company blatantly ignores its customers it usually goes under.......

RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 05-09-2012 07:32

(05-09-2012 06:51 )elroyticklestab Wrote:  After last night's ultra tame output - we are back to the two pairs of knickers farce again - I fear we are pissing into the wind in light grey trousers.....we can slag them all we like but the channels are playing their game and not listening to the customers. When a company blatantly ignores its customers it usually goes under.......

i cant understand why they are so up and down with the quality of the shows,they should be on an even keel through out the week , they are so inconsistent Huh

RE: Ofcom Discussion - Rammyrascal - 05-09-2012 08:04

(05-09-2012 06:51 )elroyticklestab Wrote:  After last night's ultra tame output - we are back to the two pairs of knickers farce again - I fear we are pissing into the wind in light grey trousers.....we can slag them all we like but the channels are playing their game and not listening to the customers. When a company blatantly ignores its customers it usually goes under.......

but in the babeshows case. if you ignore ofcom you will go under, simple as that.

RE: Ofcom Discussion - MARCCE - 05-09-2012 11:56

Lol @ the latest posts on here.

A woman is appointed as minister for women and equalities and that must mean she'll be looking into why women can't go full frontal on the babeshows?

I think people would have done well to do a bit of research into this particular lady.

A mother of 3 who was previously shadow family minister. She has previously voted against gay marriage, voted to stop abortion providers providing counselling for women with unwanted pregnancies and voted for the abortion time limit to be reduced to 20 weeks.

Not withstanding the rather dubious voting record in matters of equality, her background suggests that the harm to children mentality is likely to be far more prevalent than any desire to fight them on the beaches for women's rights to show their fannies on babe channels. A right that probably 75% of the current babe channel models would have no wish to see her fight for in any case.

I'm afraid this isn't some liberal leaning hippy who likes nothing better than going for naturist walks with the family of a weekend.

RE: Ofcom Discussion - dan g 27 - 05-09-2012 15:13

To be honest I doubt any significant changes are going to happen now as long as The Conservatives are in power

RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 05-09-2012 15:23

(05-09-2012 15:13 )dan g 27 Wrote:  To be honest I doubt any significant changes are going to happen now as long as The Conservatives are in power
about another 2 years then,unless something drastic happens like the channels launch their own attack ! Huh

RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 05-09-2012 16:14

(05-09-2012 11:56 )MARCCE Wrote:  Lol @ the latest posts on here.

A woman is appointed as minister for women and equalities and that must mean she'll be looking into why women can't go full frontal on the babeshows?

I'm afraid this isn't some liberal leaning hippy who likes nothing better than going for naturist walks with the family of a weekend.

You mean this isn't her and her civil service team on a day at the beach? Darn! laugh

[Image: gstk7711.jpg]

RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 05-09-2012 19:08

(05-09-2012 08:04 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  
(05-09-2012 06:51 )elroyticklestab Wrote:  After last night's ultra tame output - we are back to the two pairs of knickers farce again - I fear we are pissing into the wind in light grey trousers.....we can slag them all we like but the channels are playing their game and not listening to the customers. When a company blatantly ignores its customers it usually goes under.......

but in the babeshows case. if you ignore ofcom you will go under, simple as that.

You don't go under when you ignore Ofcom's freeview rules if you have a Dutch licence and start broadcasting 2 hours before Ofcom rules allow babe channels to broadcast from on Freeview , all Ofcom's bleating and moaning about the Cellcast/BS shows starting before the Ofcom imposed Freeview babe channel watershed start time of 12am has come to nothing, BS have been and still are ignoring Ofcom rules , i just loved it when Ofcom complained to the Dutch regulators about BS breaking their rules and the Dutch told Ofcom to fuck off Big Grin , or words that had the same meaning ..

RE: Ofcom Discussion - HoneyRocks - 05-09-2012 21:07

Regardless of Babestations Dutch licence, we heard at work that OFCOM had passed comments that the actual licence for the Freeview Multiplex Babestation is on IS a UK licence and with that ultimately the buck still might stop with OFCOM as if Babestation cannot be found in contempt cos of their Dutch licence, the Multiplex holder with their UK licence might instead be found responsible for rebroadcasting a channel with content outside of UK OFCOM rules so it is possible the UK regulators could yet win despite babestations Dutch licence?