+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 05-10-2014 09:21
disagree my opinions are less valid just because I mainly praise the babeshow babes. why does that make my opinions any less valid than yours, scottishbloke's or anyone else's opinions on the forum responsible adult. everyone's opinion on here has equal validity and should be treated as such
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - RESPONSIBLE ADULT - 05-10-2014 09:41
(05-10-2014 04:44 )Lotuseater Wrote:(04-10-2014 21:37 )Digital Dave Wrote:(04-10-2014 20:49 )Lotuseater Wrote: How come pre-10pm 903 Television X can broadcast their advertorial video montages girls with sucking each others' tits etc. but the live channels can't do anything remotely like that at 3 am even???
There is certainly a discrepancy in the rules that allows the TVX 10 minute free promos (free to air I assume) to be far more explicit than the fta babe channels ever can be, including allowing swearing. I can't remember what the utterly ludicrous reasoning was - perhaps eccles or mr mystery could comment?
Well that just highlights the sheer hypocrisy of the regulators - it is all about petty rules rather than protecting the children...
What is it we are protecting the children from? When I was a young lad I had all the usual kids pastimes. Riding my bike, playing football and other games. This time of year collecting wood for the bonfire. All the normal things young lads do. But one of my favourite pastimes was sticking the pages of girlie mags together. For me this is what the babechannel are, today's "girlie mags". Do kids really need protecting from them?
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Block - 05-10-2014 10:04
(05-10-2014 09:41 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote:(05-10-2014 04:44 )Lotuseater Wrote:(04-10-2014 21:37 )Digital Dave Wrote:(04-10-2014 20:49 )Lotuseater Wrote: How come pre-10pm 903 Television X can broadcast their advertorial video montages girls with sucking each others' tits etc. but the live channels can't do anything remotely like that at 3 am even???
There is certainly a discrepancy in the rules that allows the TVX 10 minute free promos (free to air I assume) to be far more explicit than the fta babe channels ever can be, including allowing swearing. I can't remember what the utterly ludicrous reasoning was - perhaps eccles or mr mystery could comment?
Well that just highlights the sheer hypocrisy of the regulators - it is all about petty rules rather than protecting the children...
What is it we are protecting the children from? When I was a young lad I had all the usual kids pastimes. Riding my bike, playing football and other games. This time of year collecting wood for the bonfire. All the normal things young lads do. But one of my favourite pastimes was sticking the pages of girlie mags together. For me this is what the babechannel are, today's "girlie mags". Do kids really need protecting from them?
Exactly. Kids don't need protecting from them. They are very tame these days. Even back in their heyday i wouldn't describe them as porn, more erotic entertainment.
I would much rather my kids catch a few minutes of a babeshow than stumble across some of the sites on the internet showing very extreme acts. Not just sexual sites but ones showing violence that shouldn't be witnessed by impressionable kids.
For a teenage boy wanting to see boobs is a 'normal' thing.
The babeshows provide a safe platform for this. They should be allowed to show what they could in their heyday.
What offcom don't realise is they are probably doing more harm than good. I say this because over regulation of the channels, (or if they had their way, banning of them all together) will drive people onto the internet.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Lotuseater - 05-10-2014 11:45
Completely agree with Block and Resp Adult
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 05-10-2014 12:43
(05-10-2014 00:02 )Scottishbloke Wrote: The ironic thing about it all is that when all of these shows took place the channels were at their peek with daily warning coming from Ofcom. Now the channels barely even get a mention now yet you get the impression as if the scrutiny was 10 times more
i have had the feeling for a wile now that ofcom has started to move some of there attention away form the shows a bit as the content has reached a level they are happy with and they have got the channels into a culture of self policing which is far more rigorous they any thing they could enforce,
i get the feeling that ofcom has stopped allegedly making complaints to them self's about the channels,
i hope the channels also have the feeling that they are coming out the dark days and can start doing a bit more, when we have a weekend like this it gives me hope that it may be true
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - RESPONSIBLE ADULT - 05-10-2014 16:21
(05-10-2014 09:21 )Rammyrascal Wrote: disagree my opinions are less valid just because I mainly praise the babeshow babes. why does that make my opinions any less valid than yours, scottishbloke's or anyone else's opinions on the forum responsible adult. everyone's opinion on here has equal validity and should be treated as such
Don't want to fall out with you Rammy. But your opinions never really vary do they? You just use the same collection of words over and over and over again and again and again. About whoever girl it may be on a certain channel. And as I say Rammy, don't want to fall out with you. Oh did I just repeat myself, sorry.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 05-10-2014 16:34
Responsible Adult does have a point.
No offence Rammy but this is a perfect example of your repetitive reviews of the shows, this is your past 4 Cagney and Lacey reviews with regards to Mellies shows
Other than a few words switched around they are all near identical.
(24-09-2014 07:43 )Rammyrascal Wrote: brilliant nightshow last night from Mellie. she looked great in her sexy secretary outfit and was at her very best with lots of cagney and lacey bouncing around and some lovely bending over the office desk with her very nice arse at the camera
(26-09-2014 08:35 )Rammyrascal Wrote: good show from mellie last night. she looked very sexy in her outfit and was at her filthiest all night with lots of cagney and lacey bouncing around and mellie giving them a good fondle.
hope mellie is on again soon
(01-10-2014 07:53 )Rammyrascal Wrote: very good show again last night from mellie last night. she looked very hot in her black pvc outfit and was on her very best filthy form with lots of cagney and lacey bouncing around and some lovely bending over with her very nice arse at the camera
(04-10-2014 22:53 )Rammyrascal Wrote: hope you can as mellie did another good show last night. she looked fantastic in her sexy secretary/businesswoman outfit and used the office set very well with lots of cagney and lacey bouncing around and some nice bending over the desk with her very nice arse at the camera
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 05-10-2014 16:45
If Repetitive reviews are being posted these are surely a fair and accurate reflection of 99.99% of the babeshows' output ?.....ie : Same Old Same Old
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 05-10-2014 16:59
I approach this from a slightly different angle.
Even when certain babes do put on a really good show some of them get the credit they deserve more universally than others.
Admittedly some of this is down to the extent of personal favouritism but even so I still feel that SOME of the babes who are more willing to try different things and push a few boundaries don't get the credit they deserve.
It may well be that for whatever reason people only choose to watch a certain selection of babes.
I can only recommend opening eyes to all the possibilities and all babes across the channels where possible.
It never ceases to amaze me the number of quality stints I see from different babes. They are still too few and far between but they often come from what I might originally have imagined to be a surprising source.
Limited options create over familiarity and a narrow perspective in my eyes and as a consequence I keep a beady eye out for quality from all channels.
The more surprising the better imo.
The forum can often get bogged down as a result of narrow perspective and its inherent natural consequences.
I tend to think it best to give myself the most options to be captivated and if nothing captures my imagination then have a whinge. But hey thats just me. Each to their own.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 05-10-2014 17:40
(04-10-2014 21:37 )Digital Dave Wrote:(04-10-2014 20:49 )Lotuseater Wrote: How come pre-10pm 903 Television X can broadcast their advertorial video montages girls with sucking each others' tits etc. but the live channels can't do anything remotely like that at 3 am even???
There is certainly a discrepancy in the rules that allows the TVX 10 minute free promos (free to air I assume) to be far more explicit than the fta babe channels ever can be, including allowing swearing. I can't remember what the utterly ludicrous reasoning was - perhaps eccles or mr mystery could comment?
I don't actually know why TVX can show what they do in the free to view unencrypted promos, and the babe channels can't do the same, but i think it's something to do with the channels being licensed for adult chat and not just straight forward advertising ? .
The free to air phone chat babe channels are classed as "long form advertising" the licences Ofcom grant to the phone in babe channels have specific rules for adult chat and daytime chat services, these are different from regular tv day and night shows .So maybe because TVX isn't a adult phone in chat service then their free to view promo doesn't come under the same rules because it doesn't use a adult advertisement chat licence, even though the promo is a advert ?.
There is a few links in this in breach ruling Ofcom gave to Playboy TV chat, it describes how Ofcom view and regulate the babe channels, it's the one were Dannii Harwoods behind the door show was found in beach .
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/obb238/obb238.pdf
Apparently broadcasting that sort of material did not comply with the adult chat guidance, and the positioning in a specialist adult section and the time it was broadcast (12am to 12.30am) was not sufficient has to ensure serious and wide spread offence against generally expected standards was not caused .
Stronger imagery is shown both by TVX and Playboy on their non encrypted parts of their encrypted shows during their free to view adverts/promos that broadcast throughout the night . Ofcom don't seem to think these stronger promos will cause widespread offence, but do think the Dannii Harwood broadcast is likely to cause widespread offence against generally expected standards .
Check out Ofcom's wording in link to the PB TV Chat in breach ruling i have given, to me it just proves how stupid the babe channel rules are .