RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 20-02-2017 12:45
Who think's this is a good idea?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - darren73 - 20-02-2017 12:50
^ NO
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 20-02-2017 13:24
(19-02-2017 02:23 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote: What we need is a return to the babe shows of 10 years ago with the girls just in thongs and high heels and moving around the sets with no perv cams
In those days the caller directed the action as they would do within reason what the caller asked so if you wanted to see the girls ass she would show it to you and if you were a boob man her tits would be on display
Motionless babes with only the top half of their bodies on show is a total turn off and why I do not phone the babes anymore
It is not the girls fault it is the channels management team
If a girl is moving around the set in a thong and high heels this will not be a problem for the dreaded Ofcom
The babestation 2 mins challenge is a farce as why would you phone the show to go through the money making long winded information recorded message for 2 mins and then if you were lucky to be put through to the babe without waiting in a queue for only chat to her for less than 2 mins. She will not know if you have shot your load or not unless you tell her.
In the good old days of Bang Babes both the callers and the girls had so much fun. Unfortunately those days will not return so the shows will continue to go down hill
Unfortunately, the focus is not on 'the shows' and traditional phone revenue, it's squarely on pervcam, and in order to maximise its 'appeal', the strategy is to show little or nothing on TV/regular streams.
Unless people stop using pervcam (though why you would use something that is apparently of poor quality, and of extortionate cost, is beyond me, but, presumably, people do), there will be no return to the 'good old days' (as you point out).
Unless, of course, I'm giving them too much credit, and the strategy is actually to piss off viewers, and potential 'phone customers', as much as possible, in which case, great job guys! Sterling work!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 20-02-2017 13:27
(20-02-2017 12:45 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: Who think's this is a good idea?
The clowns in charge of Lamestation?
Oh, and where's the 'facepalm' emoji when you need it...
And another thing, send Emoji's 'what' to the screen?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 20-02-2017 13:38
Isn't there enough crap OSG's already, the last thing we need is emojis.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 20-02-2017 15:20
(20-02-2017 12:45 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: Who think's this is a good idea?
Nope, another awful bs gimmick
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - bigglesworth - 20-02-2017 15:56
(19-02-2017 02:23 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote: What we need is a return to the babe shows of 10 years ago with the girls just in thongs and high heels and moving around the sets with no perv cams
Unfortunately that isn't exactly going to strike anyone at Babestation as a money making idea. There's simply no future for shows like that, which is why they only exist in the past.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - SmĀ© - 20-02-2017 17:04
(20-02-2017 12:45 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: Who think's this is a good idea?
Hope it doesn't end up like Twitch
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - MR PERFECT - 20-02-2017 17:08
Less calls = reduction in profits = change in proceedings simples.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 20-02-2017 17:42
they missed the pile of shit Emoji out lol
|