RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Bondless - 01-04-2017 17:40
(01-04-2017 17:20 )BarrieBF Wrote: I'd be surprised if that's correct. Lexie's been talking about leaving for a long time and even now, as far as I know, hasn't 100% ruled out the possibility of a return at some point.
I'd say that Lexie's leaving is nothing to do with the rumoured departure of a popular and regular girl, who apparently is in danger of being let go because her stats have slipped.
Who's the popular and regular girl that your'e talking about?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - trains55 - 01-04-2017 17:54
I think we'd all like to know that!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 02-04-2017 17:04
If any popular girl should be let go it should be Madison as she has had a huge fall from grace, although of course i'd rather it be Lori.
I hope its not Sophie as she doesn't seem to be on that much these days, its unlikely it will be Dannii, Ashley, Alice, the twins, Nicole and Olivia as they are always on.
As for the others how many of them are that popular anyway?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 02-04-2017 17:07
Sack the lot and start again
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Geriisgreat - 02-04-2017 17:20
Im with you joey maddie and lynda would be my top 2 to go close behind preeti and dannii
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 02-04-2017 17:35
(02-04-2017 17:07 )Bandwagon Wrote: Sack the lot and start again
Who do you suggest they sign Lola Knight? no thanks
Anyway we know the reason why you want them all sacked, well at least i do.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - KerrAvon - 02-04-2017 17:49
I'd personally sack all the producers & cameraman and get back to basics of what a babeshow is. Get back some fun, filth, sets & outfits sans gimmicks. Would probably even get the best of out whoever is failing.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - SmĀ© - 02-04-2017 18:06
(02-04-2017 17:49 )KerrAvon Wrote: I'd personally sack all the producers & cameraman and get back to basics of what a babeshow is. Get back some fun, filth, sets & outfits sans gimmicks. Would probably even get the best of out whoever is failing.
A bit like STD66 used to be like?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 02-04-2017 20:38
(02-04-2017 17:49 )KerrAvon Wrote: I'd personally sack all the producers & cameraman and get back to basics of what a babeshow is. Get back some fun, filth, sets & outfits sans gimmicks. Would probably even get the best of out whoever is failing.
Yeah well it'a novel idea .
But (a) it might be popular with viewers
(b) freeloaders might like it
( c ) it might involve SPENDING money rather than screwing it out of as many gullable suckers as possible
(d) it might require some effort
All completely unacceptable .
Now go and stand in the corner and wash your mouth out .
There undoubtedly needs to be an attitudinal revolution on the part of channels and babes alike but this seems more unlikely and further from reality than ever.
It's all about screwing money out of people and endless self indulgence.
The priority on quality of visual product for the bog standard TV viewer has reached rock bottom. Indeed the visual product barring that of pervcam seems to have taken a massive nosedive. Combine this with an ever increasing number of babes who are so far up their own backsides they are metaphorically re-emerging out of their own noses and there you have it. Utter disregard, disdain and contempt for callers and non callers alike. Wishlists, findom, gimmicks, incompetence, pecking orders and complacency. And on that note I'm off to watch some paint dry.
It makes for better viewing and it's cheaper.
Thank you and goodnight.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - forumdude - 02-04-2017 20:53
(02-04-2017 17:49 )KerrAvon Wrote: I'd personally sack all the producers & cameraman and get back to basics of what a babeshow is.
The producers and cameramen are ruining the channel so i completely agree.
|