RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 02-04-2017 20:59
These shows are actually produced Who would have thought it.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 02-04-2017 21:28
(02-04-2017 17:35 )Joey 27 Wrote: Anyway we know the reason why you want them all sacked, well at least i do.
I was actually referring to the length of time some of the girls have been working there.
Perhaps you should consider getting an adult to tighten those pram straps of yours.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 02-04-2017 22:20
(02-04-2017 21:28 )Bandwagon Wrote: (02-04-2017 17:35 )Joey 27 Wrote: Anyway we know the reason why you want them all sacked, well at least i do.
I was actually referring to the length of time some of the girls have been working there.
First you say they should all be sacked and now you are saying some have been at BS for too long, make your mind up.
If some of your old faves like Kandi Kay and Daryl Morgan were still at BS would you say they should be sacked too? no of course you wouldn't
The simple fact is you don't like girls with implants and yet again it comes down to that with you like it always does. its got nothing to do with the girls being there too long, a few only joined BS 6 months to a year ago
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 03-04-2017 12:53
(02-04-2017 22:20 )Joey 27 Wrote: (02-04-2017 21:28 )Bandwagon Wrote: (02-04-2017 17:35 )Joey 27 Wrote: Anyway we know the reason why you want them all sacked, well at least i do.
I was actually referring to the length of time some of the girls have been working there.
First you say they should all be sacked and now you are saying some have been at BS for too long, make your mind up.
If some of your old faves like Kandi Kay and Daryl Morgan were still at BS would you say they should be sacked too? no of course you wouldn't
The simple fact is you don't like girls with implants and yet again it comes down to that with you like it always does. its got nothing to do with the girls being there too long, a few only joined BS 6 months to a year ago
Whereas the reason you're panicking about any of the girls being let go, is the fear they might hire a 'natural' replacement
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - forumdude - 03-04-2017 22:48
Fake tittys is the least of babestations problems i expect another woeful night looking at the lineup
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - shankey! - 04-04-2017 06:57
(03-04-2017 22:48 )forumdude Wrote: Fake tittys is the least of babestations problems i expect another woeful night looking at the lineup
and it was...woeful,absolute garbage
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - xJ4Kx - 04-04-2017 09:22
I don't no how you all feel but I say some fker invent a time machine and lets go back to around 2009!!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 04-04-2017 12:40
I've got a time machine, and I can tell you things are going to get worse. By 2030 we will be only able to watch the girls free to air, from the neck up.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 04-04-2017 12:47
^ I'm thinking of developing a nose fetish. Should see me right.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 04-04-2017 21:53
(01-04-2017 17:40 )senor Wrote: (01-04-2017 17:20 )BarrieBF Wrote: I'd be surprised if that's correct. Lexie's been talking about leaving for a long time and even now, as far as I know, hasn't 100% ruled out the possibility of a return at some point.
I'd say that Lexie's leaving is nothing to do with the rumoured departure of a popular and regular girl, who apparently is in danger of being let go because her stats have slipped.
Who's the popular and regular girl that your'e talking about?
I hope I'm wrong but I think it could be Kimberly Jenner, her name isn't on any of the schedules for this week.
|