RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Lamarr l 21 l - 24-04-2017 21:39
I think theres more to this. I've seen Ashley Emmas show her buttocks loads of times... I think maybe they are only allowed to do it after a certain time? Maybe 22.05 was too early
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Rake - 24-04-2017 21:45
(24-04-2017 21:39 )Lamarr l 21 l Wrote: I think theres more to this. I've seen Ashley Emmas show her buttocks loads of times... I think maybe they are only allowed to do it after a certain time
Having now read the actual judgement in the Ofcom letter, it is to do with it being a "prolonged close up". It is all tied up with the visual aspect of babeshows being deemed "advertising" content, not editorial. It is "advertising" the call/chat service.
Advertising is subject to far stricter rules.
Not sure why the babeshows cannot get their status reassigned to "editorial"? Cost?
It is all a load of utter bollox, if you read it. Have Ofcom not got more important things to do?
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - DuggyG2 - 24-04-2017 21:52
(24-04-2017 21:45 )Rake Wrote: (24-04-2017 21:39 )Lamarr l 21 l Wrote: I think theres more to this. I've seen Ashley Emmas show her buttocks loads of times... I think maybe they are only allowed to do it after a certain time
Having now read the actual judgement in the Ofcom letter, it is to do with it being a "prolonged close up". It is all tied up with the visual aspect of babeshows being deemed "advertising" content, not editorial. It is "advertising" the call/chat service.
Advertising is subject to far stricter rules.
Not sure why the babeshows cannot get their status reassigned to "editorial"? Cost?
It is all a load of utter bollox, if you read it. Have Ofcom not got more important things to do?
Guess not! They should learn how to wank or get a life! Fuck ofCom,dicks .It's a fuckin adult show in the adult sextion.Cunt bags!
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 24-04-2017 22:05
I think it's just a case of them flexing their muscles every so often, reminding the channels they still exist and helping to reassure the jealous women offended people they are still active on their behalf.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Rake - 24-04-2017 22:12
There's no mention of fines in there. So just a telling off?
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 24-04-2017 22:15
^ Hopefully just a slap on the ass, nothing more.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 25-04-2017 01:46
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Pretty crappy night.
Nearly 3am, nobody nude, topless only B.S. Caty being so tame it's almost pointless to have her on nights, and the other two stuck together in predictability.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - admiral decker - 25-04-2017 02:09
(24-04-2017 21:45 )Rake Wrote: Not sure why the babeshows cannot get their status reassigned to "editorial"? Cost?
Cost is irrelevant. Even if you had unlimited funds I doubt that you could win a court action against Ofcom.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - lovebabes56 - 25-04-2017 04:13
Is Mary Whitehouse still exerting her influence on OFCOM from beyond the grave>
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Doddle - 25-04-2017 07:26
(25-04-2017 01:46 )mrmann Wrote: Nearly 3am, nobody nude, topless only B.S. Caty being so tame it's almost pointless to have her on nights, and the other two stuck together in predictability.
I thought "some miseries are going to go 'boo, Caty won't get naked, what a load of rubbish'" Oh well, your loss
|