RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 18-04-2017 16:29
(18-04-2017 15:07 )Tractor boy Wrote: Perhaps bs had a holiday relief producer in charge over Easter, some poor misguided soul who believed the channels where there to provide adult entertainment and titillation. Normal service has now resumed.
Harry Hardon staged a brief coup d'etat but BS ground forces stormed in led by Barry Borefest ably assisted by Gilbert Gimmick to restore order .
Any more scandalous excitement will be subject to scrutiny by Larry Logo on loan from another channel the name of which I have forgotten.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 18-04-2017 16:53
^ Not forgetting the invaluable part played by Percy Pervcam...
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 18-04-2017 17:01
^ ^ ^ ^ ...
Some people might actually think that there was little of interest on the babe channels in 2017, and that we had to find another way of keeping ourselves 'entertained'!
Perish the thought...
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - trains55 - 18-04-2017 17:20
(18-04-2017 16:29 )snookered147 Wrote: (18-04-2017 15:07 )Tractor boy Wrote: Perhaps bs had a holiday relief producer in charge over Easter, some poor misguided soul who believed the channels where there to provide adult entertainment and titillation. Normal service has now resumed.
Harry Hardon staged a brief coup d'etat but BS ground forces stormed in led by Barry Borefest ably assisted by Gilbert Gimmick to restore order .
Any more scandalous excitement will be subject to scrutiny by Larry Logo on loan from another channel the name of which I have forgotten.
Yes it seems to be something like that unfortunately as I have been enjoying the 11.00-11.30 BSX shows. As someone remarked on here the shows were BSX in all but name! Certainly the content was pretty "risqué" for mainstream TV! So as I have mentioned on here I'm just wondering how BS stand with OFCOM regarding the shows as they weren't encrypted and it seems that their content meant that they could/should have been!? Never mind I'm just very pleased that I managed to record the FANTASTIC shower session with Sophie and Preeti! Very steamy indeed and NOT the shower! It was without doubt the dirtiest and most risque Babestation show I've ever witnessed and recorded! Thanks girls and PLEASE can BS find that producer again!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - ceasman - 18-04-2017 18:39
(18-04-2017 17:20 )trains55 Wrote: (18-04-2017 16:29 )snookered147 Wrote: (18-04-2017 15:07 )Tractor boy Wrote: Perhaps bs had a holiday relief producer in charge over Easter, some poor misguided soul who believed the channels where there to provide adult entertainment and titillation. Normal service has now resumed.
Harry Hardon staged a brief coup d'etat but BS ground forces stormed in led by Barry Borefest ably assisted by Gilbert Gimmick to restore order .
Any more scandalous excitement will be subject to scrutiny by Larry Logo on loan from another channel the name of which I have forgotten.
Yes it seems to be something like that unfortunately as I have been enjoying the 11.00-11.30 BSX shows. As someone remarked on here the shows were BSX in all but name! Certainly the content was pretty "risqué" for mainstream TV! So as I have mentioned on here I'm just wondering how BS stand with OFCOM regarding the shows as they weren't encrypted and it seems that their content meant that they could/should have been!? Never mind I'm just very pleased that I managed to record the FANTASTIC shower session with Sophie and Preeti! Very steamy indeed and NOT the shower! It was without doubt the dirtiest and most risque Babestation show I've ever witnessed and recorded! Thanks girls and PLEASE can BS find that producer again!
Please upload this vid for all to enjoy
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - steviebaby - 18-04-2017 22:12
It was more likely just a cock up, the wrong material sent to the wrong stream.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 18-04-2017 22:22
(18-04-2017 07:14 )jimmyt73 Wrote: and to those who pour scorn on us Sky only viewers,just remember without our initial support BS would not have survived the early days and made it on to Freeview in the first place
And also remember, if it wasn't for the revenue from freeview Bs wouldn't still exist in it's current form, if at all.
We'll call that a draw, shall we?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - jimmyt73 - 18-04-2017 22:48
(18-04-2017 22:22 )The Silent Majority Wrote: (18-04-2017 07:14 )jimmyt73 Wrote: and to those who pour scorn on us Sky only viewers,just remember without our initial support BS would not have survived the early days and made it on to Freeview in the first place
And also remember, if it wasn't for the revenue from freeview Bs wouldn't still exist in it's current form, if at all.
We'll call that a draw, shall we?
i am happy to call it a draw if you can provide figures to back up your statement.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - William H Bonney - 18-04-2017 22:49
(18-04-2017 17:20 )trains55 Wrote: I have been enjoying the 11.00-11.30 BSX shows. As someone remarked on here the shows were BSX in all but name!
That's what you would expect from a BSX preview though isn't it?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 18-04-2017 23:22
(18-04-2017 22:49 )William H Bonney Wrote: (18-04-2017 17:20 )trains55 Wrote: I have been enjoying the 11.00-11.30 BSX shows. As someone remarked on here the shows were BSX in all but name!
That's what you would expect from a BSX preview though isn't it?
You might expect it, but it's not what you normally get - While FTA, from 23:00 - 23:30, FV 174 usually shows regular Babenation, the same as $ky, the only difference (I assume) being BSX branding, with a D.O.G advertising the BSX encrypted show, along with 2 or 3 brief interruptions when a babe (or babes) on a mic promotes BSX; Saturday and Sunday last weekend were totally different, with FV only stints, which were noticeably more 'adult' than the (recent-ish) norm.
|