When Asian Babes removed the censored screen too early

When Asian Babes removed the censored screen too early - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: Asian Connections (/forumdisplay.php?fid=182)
+---- Thread: When Asian Babes removed the censored screen too early (/showthread.php?tid=11994)

Pages: 1 2

RE: When Asian Babes removed the censored screen too early - StanTheMan - 06-10-2009 18:54

(06-10-2009 16:45 )Hofmiester Wrote: Just one small thought though... there are close to 50 people employed at Babeworld, Rent to be paid, Electricity Bills the size of the national deficit of a small country, fibre optic links, satalite capacity, let alone the huge sum we have to pay Mr Murdoch each year to be on his platform. Why dont you just use the 3G service or the website and pay to see what you want instead of trying to sneek a peek, and and at the same time help to fund the long term continuation of the service?

Just a thought

Well, I fully appreciate that us non-paying viewers are looked upon as scum by these channels, but apart from my strict refusal to pay such extortionate prices for the services offered- and maybe even more importantly - there'd be absolutely no fun whatsoever in getting to see the goods if it was all above board. I'll just say two words, Hof. Forbidden and Fruit Smile

RE: When Asian Babes removed the censored screen too early - Hofmiester - 07-10-2009 00:10

(06-10-2009 18:54 )StanTheMan Wrote: Well, I fully appreciate that us non-paying viewers are looked upon as scum by these channels, but apart from my strict refusal to pay such extortionate prices for the services offered- and maybe even more importantly - there'd be absolutely no fun whatsoever in getting to see the goods if it was all above board. I'll just say two words, Hof. Forbidden and Fruit

Hey Stan, I can assure you your not considerd as Scum. What I can say, is the requirements of the people that do call the shows (we like to call them customers) have a very diffrent view of how the shows should be presented from those who dont call in we can call them the window shoppers.

As in any business you will get window shoppers, and my job is to try and find a way to make you step inside the door. Hey if you dont want to come in, find my prices to expensive, dont like the look of my stock - that dosent make you scum, it just means I havent found a way of pushing your button yet. Ill try harder.

However my "Customers" are very important to me, and for that reason they will always be given priority over the "window shoppers". I know it sounds daft coming from a guy that peddles bums and boobs for a living, but I actualy belive in tradtional values, and put the customer first - dosent always quiet go to plan, but we try.

So Stan let me make you one of my challanges - how do I get you to spend just £1 on a babeworld product? What will it take Smile

- I sound like a drug dealer now, just one tiny spliff, ill get you hooked for life, LOL

Love you man

Hofmiester

RE: When Asian Babes removed the censored screen too early - StanTheMan - 07-10-2009 16:27

(07-10-2009 00:10 )Hofmiester Wrote: Hey Stan, I can assure you your not considerd as Scum.

So Stan let me make you one of my challanges - how do I get you to spend just £1 on a babeworld product? What will it take - I sound like a drug dealer now, just one tiny spliff, ill get you hooked for life, LOL

Well, maybe 'scum' was the wrong word. Maybe 'considered worthless' would have been more apt, but I accept now that this isn't the case with all channel producers.

Anyway, how could you get me to spend £1 on a babeworld product? Well, that would be difficult in that the very least I could spend would be £1.50 (on a text) but in all honesty what I'd want if I was a paying customer would get you closed down, so I don't know how you can help me Huh

Uum, love you too, man! Blush

RE: When Asian Babes removed the censored screen too early - Hofmiester - 09-10-2009 16:36

(07-10-2009 16:27 )StanTheMan Wrote: Well, maybe 'scum' was the wrong word. Maybe 'considered worthless' would have been more apt, but I accept now that this isn't the case with all channel producers.

Anyway, how could you get me to spend £1 on a babeworld product? Well, that would be difficult in that the very least I could spend would be £1.50 (on a text) but in all honesty what I'd want if I was a paying customer would get you closed down, so I don't know how you can help me

Uum, love you too, man!

Stan, you are neither Scum or Worthless - Every post you guys make on here contributes to what we try to do, it provides the evedence we need to pressure govenment into alowing us more freedoms. Belive me we know what you guys want but the powers that be dont think your responsable enough to decide what you do and dont watch.

The main issue they have is protecting the under 18's, which as a principle I totaly agree with. However those that control the platform will not let us use their PIN protection system. And those that you elect into power dont seem to have any control over those that control the platform. Which leads to the BIG question - who realy controls what you watch?

I do think its quiet Ironic that the same person who stops you watching what you want on TV is the same person that prints a picture of a Naked woman on Page 3 of one of his papers everyday.

I have to suffer life being considerd a Pornographer, which apparently makes me a 'Drug Trafficer, "A Gun Runner", a "Pimp" and a "General low life". In actual fact I am none of the above. I have learnt over the years that this always puts me on the loosing side of any argument.

You see untill the moraly corrupt do gooders of society are finaly exposed as fakes and frauds (with their imported dutch harcore DVD's secretly stashed behind their sofas) the people of this country will always be sexualy oppressed.

Consider this.. In countrys where pornography has been librilised the incedents of Sex crimes has fallen to almost insignificant lows. Reaserch (Commissioned By Ofcom) has demonstrated that exposure to pornography by persons under the age of 14 has no detremental effect. Over the Age of 14 young people general understand the context of Pornography. I have been working in the adult entertainment business for over 10 years now, and still enjoy a good healthy sex life with my wife - its not weird or satanic. The point here is all their propoganda is bollocks, and they know it.

The problem is nobody will ever stand up for us. When the last consultation was held how many viewers wrote to Ofcom - NONE! They use this as 'Evedence' that there is no requirement for the service.

I hope oneday things will change, but we need the viewers support - you are the only ones who can change things.

All The Best

HOF

RE: When Asian Babes removed the censored screen too early - StanTheMan - 09-10-2009 16:58

(09-10-2009 16:36 )Hofmiester Wrote: The problem is nobody will ever stand up for us. When the last consultation was held how many viewers wrote to Ofcom - NONE! They use this as 'Evedence' that there is no requirement for the service.

Well this might the case to a certain extent, but Ofcom aren't stupid... well they are, but not quite stupid enough not to realise that if they don't make these things public, viewers aren't going to write in with support. How can we write in with support (especialy when it's needed most) if Ofcom don't let us know we can and that if we did it would make a difference? And just a thought here. What are the possibilities that any correspondance sent into Ofcom, supporting the babe channels, has a tendancy to get 'lost' ?