+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bang Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Thread: Thoughts on Bang Babes current offerings (/showthread.php?tid=12174)
RE: Thoughts on Bang Babes current offerings - Chilly - 02-10-2009 14:22
(02-10-2009 14:17 )thinwhiteduke Wrote:(02-10-2009 13:37 )stoly Wrote:(02-10-2009 11:39 )Digital Dave Wrote:(02-10-2009 10:44 )stoly Wrote: Sure do, I'm not impressed with seeing the same faces night after night, but I'm pretty sure it has something to do with revenue, they drew in 14 million last year, but made a profit of something like one hundred and forty thousand, maybe the bosses, are treating themselves to banker type bonuses.
Where do these figures come from?
Somewhere in this forum, I came across it a few weeks ago.
Think that was the cellcast results mate.
Can't be, as Cellcast never make a profit.
@ stoly. Can you find the post that you refer to, cheers.
RE: Thoughts on Bang Babes current offerings - tsurugi - 02-10-2009 14:51
I find BB very boring unless lolly badcock is on to be honest she seems to get the girls she is paired up with to raise their games. Plus losing stevie,ree and the absence of tori has not helped always seems to be sarah louise,adele and charlie monaco on who are not the best on screen performers IMO. Just hope they can get cate and paige on more often and if the Katie K rumour is true that might improve things.
RE: Thoughts on Bang Babes current offerings - mrwotzup - 02-10-2009 15:09
(02-10-2009 14:22 )Chilly Wrote: Can't be, as Cellcast never make a profit.
Is this the thread youre thinking of ?
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=11461&pid=233937#pid233937
RE: Thoughts on Bang Babes current offerings - stoly - 02-10-2009 15:59
(02-10-2009 14:22 )Chilly Wrote:(02-10-2009 14:17 )thinwhiteduke Wrote:(02-10-2009 13:37 )stoly Wrote:(02-10-2009 11:39 )Digital Dave Wrote:(02-10-2009 10:44 )stoly Wrote: Sure do, I'm not impressed with seeing the same faces night after night, but I'm pretty sure it has something to do with revenue, they drew in 14 million last year, but made a profit of something like one hundred and forty thousand, maybe the bosses, are treating themselves to banker type bonuses.
Where do these figures come from?
Somewhere in this forum, I came across it a few weeks ago.
Think that was the cellcast results mate.
Can't be, as Cellcast never make a profit.
RE: Are Cellcast having problems?
Proving that profit is the real guide to health of a company. Cellcast made a pre-tax profit of just 180,000 pounds on 16m revenue end of 2008. That is not good.
yes that was where i picked it up from
RE: Thoughts on Bang Babes current offerings - Rammyrascal - 02-10-2009 16:40
bangbabes has slipped a bit but still has good babes like lolly, candy, donna duke and the recent additions of paige and charlie and the rumour of katie k as well
hopefully its a dip and bb will soon be back at the top
RE: Thoughts on Bang Babes current offerings - Digital Dave - 02-10-2009 16:49
(02-10-2009 15:59 )stoly Wrote: RE: Are Cellcast having problems?
Proving that profit is the real guide to health of a company. Cellcast made a pre-tax profit of just 180,000 pounds on 16m revenue end of 2008. That is not good.
yes that was where i picked it up from
But Cellcast isn't Bang Babes. It's best not to post unsubstantiated and incorrect data as it doesn't help discussion and it might get you into trouble!
RE: Thoughts on Bang Babes current offerings - stoly - 02-10-2009 16:55
(02-10-2009 16:49 )Digital Dave Wrote:(02-10-2009 15:59 )stoly Wrote: RE: Are Cellcast having problems?
Proving that profit is the real guide to health of a company. Cellcast made a pre-tax profit of just 180,000 pounds on 16m revenue end of 2008. That is not good.
yes that was where i picked it up from
But Cellcast isn't Bang Babes. It's best not to post unsubstantiated and incorrect data as it doesn't help discussion and it might get you into trouble!
Ok , so what's the reason it's now crap
RE: Thoughts on Bang Babes current offerings - Topman 47 - 02-10-2009 17:04
Seems we are drifting to profit & loss rather than the reason for the downhill slide. Whilst I appreciate revenue is important it is always profit that has to be maintained.
BB did attract babes from other channels after losing out to Elite to boost their ratings, which to me is now backfiring. As B/Station have improved their act, seemingly by catering for generally everyone by the
younger / older model, BB need to respond and in my opinion need to find younger perhaps unknown models like Stevie was when she joined.
Whilst attracting older models from other stations or returning babes will they maintain their market share. They do need to step un the anti.
RE: Thoughts on Bang Babes current offerings - seth - 02-10-2009 17:15
Sasha and Emily gone, and Victoria no longer doing nights, takes some replacing.
Only Lolly's keeping that channel above water, like others have mentioned
RE: Thoughts on Bang Babes current offerings - bigdog09 - 02-10-2009 17:17
its been poor recently. stevie left at a time when toni was on holiday and tori wasnt on much, made me realise how poor some of the other girls are.
only thing that keeps me watching it is it has the best webstream.