+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: The Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=408)
+--- Thread: Tamest night ever?? (/showthread.php?tid=13047)
RE: Tamest night ever?? - StanTheMan - 30-10-2009 01:03
(28-10-2009 07:26 )ivorthckeshaft Wrote: Last night I saw less flesh and more dull performances than I have seen in years. Was this a one off or have the twunts at Ofcom got wind of recent developments?
I was going to start a similar thread.
There seems to have been a definate cooling down taking place over the last few days. I suppose we should just be grateful we got the hot spell at all, but it would certainly be nice to see it return before they lose momentum and fall into the hole of shit they were in prior to the hot spell - they can't possibly get any worse than that.
I blame the 'also ran' channels, such as Babestation, Cream and Filth. While we've got shit like this holding back the others, no real and sustained development can take place. Babestation is now so far behind the times it's fucking untrue!
RE: Tamest night ever?? - pissfanatic - 30-10-2009 18:37
(30-10-2009 01:03 )StanTheMan Wrote:(28-10-2009 07:26 )ivorthckeshaft Wrote: Last night I saw less flesh and more dull performances than I have seen in years. Was this a one off or have the twunts at Ofcom got wind of recent developments?
I was going to start a similar thread.
There seems to have been a definate cooling down taking place over the last few days. I suppose we should just be grateful we got the hot spell at all, but it would certainly be nice to see it return before they lose momentum and fall into the hole of shit they were in prior to the hot spell - they can't possibly get any worse than that.
I blame the 'also ran' channels, such as Babestation, Cream and Filth. While we've got shit like this holding back the others, no real and sustained development can take place. Babestation is now so far behind the times it's fucking untrue!
I disagree - you obviously weren't watching BangBabes - ThePad on 959 - so many pussy slips it was really good (I have some screen captures
!
RE: Tamest night ever?? - StanTheMan - 30-10-2009 19:33
(30-10-2009 18:37 )pissfanatic Wrote:(30-10-2009 01:03 )StanTheMan Wrote:(28-10-2009 07:26 )ivorthckeshaft Wrote: Last night I saw less flesh and more dull performances than I have seen in years. Was this a one off or have the twunts at Ofcom got wind of recent developments?
I was going to start a similar thread.
There seems to have been a definate cooling down taking place over the last few days. I suppose we should just be grateful we got the hot spell at all, but it would certainly be nice to see it return before they lose momentum and fall into the hole of shit they were in prior to the hot spell - they can't possibly get any worse than that.
I blame the 'also ran' channels, such as Babestation, Cream and Filth. While we've got shit like this holding back the others, no real and sustained development can take place. Babestation is now so far behind the times it's fucking untrue!
I disagree - you obviously weren't watching BangBabes - ThePad on 959 - so many pussy slips it was really good (I have some screen captures
I think we're talking the bigger picture here. I dare say there's still the odd pussy slip, but up until about a week ago we had about a month of sustained, boundary-pushing material from all the big channels. For the last week that simply hasn't been the case. Even with the pussy slips you mention I still maintain things have cooled down somewhat.
RE: Tamest night ever?? - TheDarkKnight - 30-10-2009 21:36
Things always seem to cool down dureing the week.
I'm gonna reserve judgement 'till after the weekend.
BTW...if there are new rules, Amanda don't give a fuck.
RE: Tamest night ever?? - StanTheMan - 31-10-2009 05:53
(30-10-2009 21:36 )TheDarkKnight Wrote: Things always seem to cool down dureing the week.
I'm gonna reserve judgement 'till after the weekend.
BTW...if there are new rules, Amanda don't give a fuck.
Looks like you could be right, TheDarkKnight... on both accounts if Amanda's show with Donna is anything to go by. The Scottish fireball had obvioulsy received orders to simmer down when they came back for the last half hour, but her sessions before that
RE: Tamest night ever?? - Censorship :-( - 31-10-2009 10:07
(31-10-2009 05:53 )StanTheMan Wrote:(30-10-2009 21:36 )TheDarkKnight Wrote: Things always seem to cool down dureing the week.
I'm gonna reserve judgement 'till after the weekend.
BTW...if there are new rules, Amanda don't give a fuck.
Looks like you could be right, TheDarkKnight... on both accounts if Amanda's show with Donna is anything to go by. The Scottish fireball had obvioulsy received orders to simmer down when they came back for the last half hour, but her sessions before that
They went out on Freeview for the last half hour which, sadly, explains why it was tamer than the earlier output; this seems to be the norm, I'm afraid.
It illustrates how poor things are on Freeview, because the 'tame' section at the end was still much better than most of what Freeview has 'enjoyed' for most of this week
RE: Tamest night ever?? - StanTheMan - 31-10-2009 20:27
(31-10-2009 10:07 )Censorship :-( Wrote:(31-10-2009 05:53 )StanTheMan Wrote:(30-10-2009 21:36 )TheDarkKnight Wrote: Things always seem to cool down dureing the week.
I'm gonna reserve judgement 'till after the weekend.
BTW...if there are new rules, Amanda don't give a fuck.
Looks like you could be right, TheDarkKnight... on both accounts if Amanda's show with Donna is anything to go by. The Scottish fireball had obvioulsy received orders to simmer down when they came back for the last half hour, but her sessions before that
They went out on Freeview for the last half hour which, sadly, explains why it was tamer than the earlier output; this seems to be the norm, I'm afraid.
It illustrates how poor things are on Freeview, because the 'tame' section at the end was still much better than most of what Freeview has 'enjoyed' for most of this week
Ah, thanks for that, censorship. The difference was notable, and I assumed it was for the reasons I gave, but what you say explains a lot. I actually feel for the freeview viewers if that's the case. As a note of interest, if you can pick up a digibox and dish for cheap and get someone who knows what they're doing to install them, you don't need a $ky subscription to get the babe channels. I believe that's the case anyway, but I'm sure someone will be along to say otherwise if I'm wrong.
RE: Tamest night ever?? - TheDarkKnight - 31-10-2009 21:55
(31-10-2009 20:27 )StanTheMan Wrote: ...and get someone who knows what they're doing to install them...
Take it from me, if you can put up a shelf, you can install a satellite dish.
I think you can get freeview digiboxes from e-bay for circa 20-30 quid. A second hand dish should cost around the same and cable 10-15.
Free babes foreveh!
(I 'aint got no sky sub
)[edit]
*cough*
Cheap digibox
Dish
Cable
You dont even relly need to buy a 'satellite' finder, but you can get them for a fiver if you need one. But, tbh, you're just as good using google maps to zoom down on your house, find south, find 28 degrees east of that, point your dish that way then fiddle with it like you would do with an indoor arial. It really isn't rocket science and there's a ton of websites out there with downloadable setup guides if you need help.
I put up my own motorised dish which is far more complicated than a fixed system and I had no trouble with it at all.
RE: Tamest night ever?? - old git - 31-10-2009 22:07
I stopped subscribing to sky a while back and i can still view all the babe channels.
RE: Tamest night ever?? - mikedafc - 31-10-2009 22:17
BangBabes take part in the Adult Protection schemes which tell people how to block their channels and 18 rated content. More of the babe channels should follow suit and therefore they would be able to be more daring!!