+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: SportxxxBabes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+---- Thread: Using One's Imagination! Wot No Hair?! (/showthread.php?tid=14669)
RE: Using One's Imagination! Wot No Hair?! - StanTheMan - 05-12-2009 03:57
(04-12-2009 10:49 )Serena/Hazel(May) Wrote: ... a change of rules has suddenly imposed no flashing at all of pubic hair or sitting naked...
It would appear Bailey hasn't been told about these new rules yet. Selena, I know your intentions were good, but how can anyone be expected to know what's going on when we're constantly being mis-informed? The rules are confusing enough without these rumours and speculations.
RE: Using One's Imagination! Wot No Hair?! - SOOPSOOP - 05-12-2009 04:44
To be fair, Avalon's muff seems to have vanished as well.
RE: Using One's Imagination! Wot No Hair?! - mucker - 05-12-2009 08:48
(05-12-2009 01:29 )Charlemagne Wrote: Reede is nude on Babestation, but the babes on Sport and Hotel Voyeur are being more reserved than normal.
Maybe its just a bush ban. So Hazel you may have to have a trim
Emily did a nude set on elite last night aswell, mind you it's the first one we've seen on there from any of the girls in a while
.
RE: Using One's Imagination! Wot No Hair?! - Charlemagne - 05-12-2009 09:34
Lori also had a long session nude last night.
WOW Babestation is becoming the most adventurous channel.
I never thought that I would be saying this
RE: Using One's Imagination! Wot No Hair?! - Serena - 06-12-2009 23:57
As soon as I was told I could go nude and show 'bush' I did. Now I've been told NO NO NO so I don't. Believe me, it's very annoying. I'm proud of what I've got to show and it doesn't help me if viewers decide not to call because of the limitations.
I do think that pubic hair is wrongly discriminated against. I mean .... a lady with no hair can wear tiny knickers and get away with it. Now I have to wear big ones again. Hair is natural! Hey - if I decided to have hairy armpits (heaven forbid) would I then have to keep my arms firmly by my side? Makes one wonder!
RE: Using One's Imagination! Wot No Hair?! - Bailey - 07-12-2009 01:48
(05-12-2009 03:57 )StanTheMan Wrote:(04-12-2009 10:49 )Serena/Hazel(May) Wrote: ... a change of rules has suddenly imposed no flashing at all of pubic hair or sitting naked...
It would appear Bailey hasn't been told about these new rules yet. Selena, I know your intentions were good, but how can anyone be expected to know what's going on when we're constantly being mis-informed? The rules are confusing enough without these rumours and speculations.
Thats right Stan drop me in the S***!!!
Bailey x x
RE: Using One's Imagination! Wot No Hair?! - Bluearmy71 - 07-12-2009 02:00
(07-12-2009 01:48 )Bailey Wrote: Thats right Stan drop me in the S***!!!
Having seen a vid or 2 of yours Bailey I would have thought that would be right up your street
RE: Using One's Imagination! Wot No Hair?! - Bailey - 07-12-2009 02:18
(07-12-2009 02:00 )Bluearmy71 Wrote: Having seen a vid or 2 of yours Bailey I would have thought that would be right up your street
LOL! Yes.......I have had the occasional accidental slip and now I am extra careful
and no more painting on the bushwacker!!Despite having to be more careful, had a fantastic Friday and Saturday night and was still very horny :-) so a big thank you for all of your calls and text messages
Kisses Bailey
RE: Using One's Imagination! Wot No Hair?! - Browser1 - 07-12-2009 18:50
(06-12-2009 23:57 )Serena/Hazel(May) Wrote: As soon as I was told I could go nude and show 'bush' I did. Now I've been told NO NO NO so I don't. Believe me, it's very annoying. I'm proud of what I've got to show and it doesn't help me if viewers decide not to call because of the limitations.
I do think that pubic hair is wrongly discriminated against. I mean .... a lady with no hair can wear tiny knickers and get away with it. Now I have to wear big ones again. Hair is natural! Hey - if I decided to have hairy armpits (heaven forbid) would I then have to keep my arms firmly by my side? Makes one wonder!
That is definitely true! And it's what's confusing the most about this sudden nudity drought -surely the hair would cover that which must not be shown i.e. the actual genitals! I was of the impression that it was all right to show bush, because it was a standin for the lack of genital display! Hopefully, this drought will only be a short-term thing, and we'll be back to the glorious displays again soon! Here's hoping.
Lets start a campaign:
WHAT DO WE WANT? PUBES! WHEN DO WE WANT THEM? NOW!
RE: Using One's Imagination! Wot No Hair?! - SOOPSOOP - 07-12-2009 18:54
I was under the impression full frontal with pubic hair was perfectly allowable. It's only open leg and slit that isn't. Blimey, soon be like Japan