+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Forum: Information On This Website & Help (/forumdisplay.php?fid=103)
+---- Forum: General Site Information (/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+---- Thread: Non-Babe channel related threads (/showthread.php?tid=14769)
Pages: 1 2
RE: Non-Babe channel related threads - admin. - 10-01-2010 19:13
(10-01-2010 18:43 )Bluearmy71 Wrote: "People like Bluearmy are so volatile" Is that not bordering on libellous?? Deformation of character????
No, a remark like that wouldn't constitute libel. It's just a subjective opinion that doesn't allege any erroneous facts which may be damaging to your reputation. It's not even singling you out as a person, but says "people like Bluearmy". No lawyer would attempt to argue that a vague statement like this constituted libel.
RE: Non-Babe channel related threads - Bluearmy71 - 10-01-2010 19:29
(10-01-2010 19:13 )admin Wrote:(10-01-2010 18:43 )Bluearmy71 Wrote: "People like Bluearmy are so volatile" Is that not bordering on libellous?? Deformation of character????
No, a remark like that wouldn't constitute libel. It's just a subjective opinion that doesn't allege any erroneous facts which may be damaging to your reputation. It's not even singling you out as a person, but says "people like Bluearmy". No lawyer would attempt to argue that a vague statement like this constituted libel.
OK So are you saying I/we now have free licence, to make remarks about certain people if it contains the word "Like" in the name of subjective opinion obviously! I mean that wouldn't offend anyone would it?
Vague statement or not, I do not like the insinuation against myself, its wrong of yourself and Moderators to let something like that stand, if only on the grounds that it could be influential to others!
I am no legal expert, so thanks for clearing that up Admin, but I am not going to stand by and let people make insinuations against me, as I fear no one would!
I just have one question, are you defending him or the forum?
RE: Non-Babe channel related threads - admin. - 10-01-2010 19:55
(10-01-2010 19:29 )Bluearmy71 Wrote:
I just have one question, are you defending him or the forum?
I'm not defending either. I'm merely pointing out that a remark as mild as 'volatile' could never be construed as libellous.
RE: Non-Babe channel related threads - Bluearmy71 - 10-01-2010 20:15
(10-01-2010 19:55 )admin Wrote:(10-01-2010 19:29 )Bluearmy71 Wrote:
I just have one question, are you defending him or the forum?
I'm not defending either. I'm merely pointing out that a remark as mild as 'volatile' could never be construed as libellous.
It was kind of a rhetorical question, but thanks anyway
RE: Non-Babe channel related threads - Digital Dave - 11-01-2010 21:13
(10-01-2010 20:15 )Bluearmy71 Wrote:(10-01-2010 19:55 )admin Wrote:(10-01-2010 19:29 )Bluearmy71 Wrote:
I just have one question, are you defending him or the forum?
I'm not defending either. I'm merely pointing out that a remark as mild as 'volatile' could never be construed as libellous.
It was kind of a rhetorical question, but thanks anyway
Lol, every time I read a response from 'admin' on any subject it makes me think that he's not actually a human being but a rather poorly programmed piece of software.
RE: Non-Babe channel related threads - seth - 30-01-2010 10:50
All the better message boards allow off-topic sub-forums. If you don't like threads non-babe related then you don't have to look at them.