+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Forum: Member Introductions & Personal Talk (/forumdisplay.php?fid=87)
+---- Forum: The Twilight Zone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=84)
+---- Thread: [split] TJ aka Mel Rook (/showthread.php?tid=17668)
RE: TJ aka Mel Rook - Sooky™ - 22-02-2010 02:58
(22-02-2010 02:43 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: It's a shame, because it drags a fun Forum down. It's just so... Gay.
"By registering on this discussion system you agree that you will not post any material which is knowingly false, inaccurate, abusive, hateful, harassing, sexually orientated, threatening or invasive of a person's privacy, or any other material which may violate any applicable laws."
Source: http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=10998&pid=212773#pid212773
RE: TJ aka Mel Rook - Dave 1664 - 22-02-2010 03:33
Hi
For the comment to say the stud lacks ability, The shot is only a partial extract from the scene. How without seeing the scene can anyone comment on his ability accurately? This post seems to be more about a persecute bluebird rather than TJ herself
RE: TJ aka Mel Rook - LittleEgg - 23-02-2010 02:50
If it was the same guy who "performed" in the heavenly scene then...just......oh dear.
Cheesy grunting and over exaggeration to the point of comedy tbh. And also if someone is gonna be banging my favourite TV babes, i'd prefer not to have some cheese meister on the job because i personally just feel they deserve better.
Rather see a great looking couple of performers, who are into really into each other.....than a great looking girl who clearly isnt enjoying her time with the guy she is having to "perform" with.
Probably why heavenly was so quiet in her first scene....that dude just killed everything.
RE: TJ aka Mel Rook - BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL - 23-02-2010 02:51
[/quote]
"By registering on this discussion system you agree that you will not post any material which is knowingly false, inaccurate, abusive, hateful, harassing, sexually orientated, threatening or invasive of a person's privacy, or any other material which may violate any applicable laws."
Source: http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=10998&pid=212773#pid212773
[/quote]
We agree. Would be nice if that rule were applied to the original posters of the Abuse to which we responded.
Relevant to your 2 posts on this subject:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay
When used with a derisive attitude (e.g. "that was so gay"), the word gay is pejorative. While retaining its other meanings, it has also acquired "a widespread current usage" amongst young people, as a general term of disparagement.[25][26] This pejorative usage has its origins in the late 1970s. Beginning in the 1980s and especially in the late 1990s, the usage as a generic insult became common among young people.[26]
This usage of the word has been criticized as homophobic. A 2006 BBC ruling by the Board of Governors over the use of the word in this context by Chris Moyles on his Radio 1 show, "I do not want that one, it's gay," advises "caution on its use" for this reason:
“ "The word ‘gay’, in addition to being used to mean ‘homosexual’ or ‘carefree’, was often now used to mean ‘lame’ or ‘rubbish’. This is a widespread current usage of the word amongst young people... The word 'gay' ... need not be offensive... or homophobic ... The governors said, however, that Moyles was simply keeping up with developments in English usage. ... The committee... was "familiar with hearing this word in this context." The governors believed that in describing a ring tone as 'gay', the DJ was conveying that he thought it was 'rubbish', rather than 'homosexual'. ... The panel acknowledged however that this use... in a derogatory sense... could cause offence in some listeners, and counselled caution on its use. ”
—BBC Board of Governors, [25]
The BBC's ruling was heavily criticised by the Minister for Children, Kevin Brennan, who stated in response that "the casual use of homophobic language by mainstream radio DJs" is:
“ "too often seen as harmless banter instead of the offensive insult that it really represents. ... To ignore this problem is to collude in it. The blind eye to casual name-calling, looking the other way because it is the easy option, is simply intolerable." ”
—Tony Grew, [27]
Shortly after the Moyles incident a campaign against homophobia was launched in Britain under the slogan "homophobia is gay", playing on the double meaning of the word "gay" in youth culture.[28]
RE: TJ aka Mel Rook - Mister Gummidge - 23-02-2010 03:17
Speaking as a man with Jewish ancestry, replace the word "gay" in the posts you made, with the word "Jewish" or ask any black person how they would feel if the word used was "Nigger-like", then try telling me it's not offensive. I've been on the receiving end of people casually tossing around insulting and derogatory terms, then saying something like "Well, I didn't mean it like that. I don't mean you obviously." It doesn't wash. Call someone a dickhead or a wanker, or fucking shitstain or whatever, if you want to be insulting. Please don't use words which describe an entire section of society as insults. My half Jewish self, my Nigger-like friends and my gay cousin whose wedding I attended last year will all thank you for it.
RE: TJ aka Mel Rook - BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL - 23-02-2010 03:25
(23-02-2010 02:50 )LittleEgg Wrote: If it was the same guy who "performed" in the heavenly scene then...just......oh dear.
Cheesy grunting and over exaggeration to the point of comedy tbh. And also if someone is gonna be banging my favourite TV babes, i'd prefer not to have some cheese meister on the job because i personally just feel they deserve better.
Rather see a great looking couple of performers, who are into really into each other.....than a great looking girl who clearly isnt enjoying her time with the guy she is having to "perform" with.
Probably why heavenly was so quiet in her first scene....that dude just killed everything.
You're entitled to your opinion as to what studs you like. Bear in mind that the TV Babes XXX contractually choose what stud they are going to work with though. Some prefer to work with their own boyfriends, some with professional studs. So we as a company don't have the freedom of stud choice that we have in standard Porno productions.
When it comes to facts: Heavenly was quiet in her first scene [as previously posted] because she was streaming with flu. The 'dude' was actually an on-off boyfriend of hers [again as previously posted]. And in the 2nd scene she did with that 'dude' she was anything but quiet.
RE: TJ aka Mel Rook - BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL - 23-02-2010 03:30
(23-02-2010 03:17 )Mister Gummidge Wrote: Speaking as a man with Jewish ancestry, replace the word "gay" in the posts you made, with the word "Jewish" or ask any black person how they would feel if the word used was "Nigger-like", then try telling me it's not offensive. I've been on the receiving end of people casually tossing around insulting and derogatory terms, then saying something like "Well, I didn't mean it like that. I don't mean you obviously." It doesn't wash. Call someone a dickhead or a wanker, or fucking shitstain or whatever, if you want to be insulting. Please don't use words which describe an entire section of society as insults. My half Jewish self, my Nigger-like friends and my gay cousin whose wedding I attended last year will all thank you for it.
Nice try, but language doesn't work like that. 'Gay' is not the same as 'nigger': it derives from and is applied in a completely different semantic context.
"a campaign against homophobia was launched in Britain under the slogan "homophobia is gay", playing on the double meaning of the word "gay" in youth culture.": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay. Please share that with your cousin.
Full article section posted in response to Suki: who still appears not to have read it.
RE: TJ aka Mel Rook - vostok 1 - 23-02-2010 03:41
(23-02-2010 03:30 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: Nice try, but language doesn't work like that. 'Gay' is not the same as 'nigger': it derives from and is applied in a completely different semantic context.
Since you mention "context", it is only fair to quote the original post you made:
(21-02-2010 03:43 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: "Have you ANY idea how pathetic and gay you sound having a go at my stud ?"
RE: TJ aka Mel Rook - BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL - 23-02-2010 03:43
[/quote]
Since you mention "context", it is only fair to quote the original post you made:
(21-02-2010 03:43 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: "Have you ANY idea how pathetic and gay you sound having a go at my stud ?"[/quote]
Exactly. Thank you.
RE: TJ aka Mel Rook - BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL - 23-02-2010 03:54
(20-02-2010 06:09 )tsurugi Wrote: Knew i had seen him somewhere before
But of course it's different when its not Bluebird:
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=11649&pid=358445
Oh dear....