+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: Babestation fanzone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=55)
+----- Forum: Paige Tyler (/forumdisplay.php?fid=119)
+----- Thread: FAO Paige Lovers (/showthread.php?tid=1791)
RE: FAO Paige Lovers - robhojy - 13-12-2008 00:49
oh yeh also it better not be cellcast whos frontin it,
RE: FAO Paige Lovers - biker200 - 13-12-2008 01:17
somebody said she was a bit static on here but apart from that everyone seems to agree she is hot, even the guy who said she didnt move around enough.
RE: FAO Paige Lovers - Red - 13-12-2008 02:46
Well I'm going to stick with my initial conclusion on why it requires a PM
For those of you that want to know my opinion PM me
RE: FAO Paige Lovers - mikepar - 13-12-2008 04:53
Paige was upset at the assumption that the nude pics were real and that well all the girls have done nude work assumption.
She e-mailed both the supposed photographer and the person that put the pics on here, neither to my knowledge replied to her.
RE: FAO Paige Lovers - BelfastBadBoy - 13-12-2008 08:48
So Paige has never done any topless work whatsoever,none at all nadda? All the topless pics about Paige every single one of those pics are fake? Someone went out of their way to create fake topless pictures of a girl from a tv station only a small demographic watches?
RE: FAO Paige Lovers - surreysub - 13-12-2008 10:21
Sounds like she's ashamed that her past had caught up with her...
So assuming she no longer does nude pics, what is the appeal of the website? In fact, what is the appeal of nude pics? Newsflash - this is the internet, withing seconds I can go watch a lesbian orgy if I so desire; I'm afraid nude or glamour shuts just don't cut it.
RE: FAO Paige Lovers - mega79 - 13-12-2008 10:39
This guy is clearly an idiot looking for attention.
RE: FAO Paige Lovers - Dreamlander - 13-12-2008 10:44
That is definately Paige in those nude photos and she is stunning in them,they are tastefully shot and not porn and if I had a face and body like that I would be proud!(and locked in my room 'contemplating' a lot more!) I did notice that the images I got that were of a slightly 'glamour' genre about 18 months ago disappeared from the Google search shortly after she became a permanent fixture on PP. Trying to hide or deny anything you have done in the past from the internet is impossible and Paige has done nothing to be remotely ashamed of,in fact many of her fan base have probably sprung up from those images.There are many other models who have done awful things they would rather were not on the web so Paige should be proud that her past is only full of good stuff!
I am a massive fan of Paige and nothing she has done has made me think any less of her.
Dreamlander
RE: FAO Paige Lovers - Red - 13-12-2008 14:43
Okay, still haven't had the original question answered properly, guess I was just to clever for my own good
If you're worried about the wrong people finding out then don't post here, in fact I'd recommend Paige doesn't have a website. At the end of the day Paige is a small bit player in a very large market. If she thinks she can afford to turn down effectively free advertising that is up to her.
Personally I don't care either way, nor do I think the requirement for people to PM was anything to do with her. Just a case of LMS in my opinion
RE: FAO Paige Lovers - mikepar - 13-12-2008 19:12
I look at the evidence and make conclusions based on evidence.
You know what forget it. I wish I had never posted here about it.