The UK Babe Channels Forum
No confidence - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: BABESTATION TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Thread: No confidence (/showthread.php?tid=18875)

Pages: 1 2 3


RE: No confidence - vila - 06-04-2010 12:37

(05-04-2010 11:46 )Chico Wrote:  Also quite a lot of the girls were just plain bad at presenting which made for bad TV.

That's no problem. All they need do is make sure the anchor girl is one of those who are competent at the job. There are plenty to choose from: Geri, Jodie, Toya, Paige, Lori, Daryl, Karina, Dionne and Camilla all come to mind immediately.


RE: No confidence - Rammyrascal - 06-04-2010 15:43

no because of the constant messing with bsxtra. as has been said all they need to do is choose a babe who is good on the mic ie daryl, camilla or lori and it will work. also for not having jessica, jasmine, rosie and charlie c on nights


RE: No confidence - perana68 - 06-04-2010 16:26

I voted Don't Care for a number reasons but mostly because I really don't


RE: No confidence - BarrieBF - 06-04-2010 17:20

(06-04-2010 10:56 )Ally4Paige Wrote:  !annoyed!In the spirit of the forthcoming election how about a vote of no confidence in the producers?

No confidence in the producers doing what? It's inevitable that the girls with the higher call minutes will get the most shifts.


RE: No confidence - bytor - 06-04-2010 17:46

Whats the point of a no confidence vote-Babestation are a business selling in the main telephone sex to paying customers-not an elected body vying for your vote-They may possibly use this forum as a guide to what the punters are thinking but don't be fooled for a minute that they make their business decisions purely on what the members of this forum think. You would be over estimating your sense of self-importance if you do.


RE: No confidence - vila - 06-04-2010 17:51

They ARE vying for votes - votes which are cast by whether or not viewers reach for their phones.


RE: No confidence - bytor - 06-04-2010 18:15

(06-04-2010 17:51 )vila Wrote:  They ARE vying for votes - votes which are cast by whether or not viewers reach for their phones.

just wish everyone would stop moaning-if they listen to the half who aren't happy now and change everything then the half who were happy will then be pissed off. Just enjoy it-it's the girls at the end of the day that count-yes the camera work is often crap and they hard sell at every opportunity so what-lifes too short to get wound up over it.


RE: No confidence - Paulie69 - 06-04-2010 18:19

Now if this was a vote of no confidence as regards to BS cameramen, i'd vote gladly. Watching Tiff last night the camera seemed to go walkabouts on a few occasions Big Grin

When Tiffany put her hand down towards her nether regions, i thought the cameraman would pan up to her face, and he tried to, but it ended up as a shot of 'no man's land' Big Grin

I voted no for the BSXtra affair, btw.


RE: No confidence - vila - 06-04-2010 19:49

(06-04-2010 18:19 )Quetzalcoatl Wrote:  Now if this was a vote of no confidence as regards to BS cameramen, i'd vote gladly.

It's my understanding that the 'producer' is simply a fancy title for the principal cameraman on any given channel.


RE: No confidence - Trickster - 06-04-2010 23:00

Well seems as they have stuffed Rosie on days its a big NO and they also ditched Jessica who i thought was doing great