+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Forum: Information On This Website & Help (/forumdisplay.php?fid=103)
+---- Forum: General Site Information (/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+---- Thread: A landmark achievement for 20 forum members (/showthread.php?tid=23739)
RE: A landmark achievement for 20 forum members - Dan Volatile - 24-08-2010 01:43
Thanks admin.
Myself and thewatcher would also like to see lists of biggest thankers per unit time as members of the forum as well highest and lowest thanks to posts ratios and highest and lowest thanks to thanked ratio lists.
Cheers
Dan
RE: A landmark achievement for 20 forum members - chrislatimer - 24-08-2010 01:47
(24-08-2010 01:43 )Dan Volatile Wrote: Thanks admin.
Myself and thewatcher would also like to see lists of biggest thankers per unit time as members of the forum as well highest and lowest thanks to posts ratios and highest and lowest thanks to thanked ratio lists.
Cheers
Dan
id like to see this myself, even if i think ill be low on this as i must of only thanked like 70 posts all together.
rammy on the other hand must of thanked 23000 times at least.
RE: A landmark achievement for 20 forum members - admin. - 24-08-2010 17:32
(24-08-2010 01:43 )Dan Volatile Wrote: Myself and thewatcher would also like to see lists of biggest thankers per unit time as members of the forum as well highest and lowest thanks to posts ratios and highest and lowest thanks to thanked ratio lists.
I'm not sure how some of those would work out. For example, many members have thanked without posting and many members have posted without thanking, so none of those would have any ratio as such. There would be something like 2,300 members who have posted without ever being thanked, so they would all qualify as joint first in a lowest thanks to post ratio list.
RE: A landmark achievement for 20 forum members - Dan Volatile - 24-08-2010 17:54
Only count members with more than an arbitrary minimum number of posts, maybe 100?
RE: A landmark achievement for 20 forum members - HEX!T - 25-08-2010 10:38
i think it would be pretty hard to find any member that hasn't been thanked in 100 posts.
RE: A landmark achievement for 20 forum members - admin. - 30-08-2010 10:05
I'm not sure that this information's useful, but it was requested and it's a bank holiday too, so why not?
Here is a list of the top 100 thanks to thanked ratio (only members with 125 posts or more are included):
old git 83.63
gtheg 74.56
amsy2k2000 58.80
shaymas 45.24
roystonmerchant 43.38
beardedbob 38.70
LazyD 37.30
adam13 26.22
deano 23.60
doggie12 23.23
hisir 22.06
Vishvanath 17.74
mikejg069 17.24
nine hundred 17.08
steven6 16.15
flavid 15.41
mr mystery 13.51
Ro1982 12.27
zola 11.76
dopey1 11.72
rumbletum 10.47
dafro77 10.46
wacker725 10.20
TheDude 9.29
Browser1 9.18
Sainttau 8.48
dazaman 8.27
mark 7.82
mf135 7.25
Jonnieboy 6.92
sboss 6.62
scoopz 6.16
misterG 5.77
Headlessman 5.66
gillyboy2 5.66
Ponty100 5.64
seth 5.62
Gun33 5.59
DOBSTER 5.36
El Minx 4.93
dondoe 4.93
cdm79 4.87
loverboy09 4.86
doc7576 4.80
Mister Gummidge 4.45
Topman 47 4.38
stueyboy 4.23
dick4dani 4.17
AngryPirate 4.17
adelmo 4.01
rickhardo 3.99
pm74 3.93
Freebird 3.91
Rivers 3.84
Trickster 3.68
hedthorn 3.67
Chucknorris 3.57
united3000 3.55
pipolo 3.53
Jack Vakire 3.52
rachelcolesman 3.44
scope 317 3.41
T-850 3.25
testup10 3.19
scouser28 3.17
roberto123 3.10
HAGGIS 3.00
DanniPandemos 2.97
BgLugs 2.82
gillespie 2.78
Rammyrascal 2.70
fred69 2.69
Paulie69 2.66
SOCATOA 2.66
199lives 2.63
flackman 2.54
groundnpound 2.54
astonv1 2.50
vicayers 2.46
pewack1976 2.43
mozza 2.39
rocksaviour 2.38
vila 2.37
Devillish 2.37
Da Mastah 2.34
Tepid water 2.23
jaggsy6 2.20
Brembo 2.20
fatsoburger999 2.17
Censorship :-( 2.16
Regenerated 2.16
Dazwrexham 2.14
rover 2.02
EssexWanker 1.97
DOCTOR JOHN 1.97
Ali Lover #1 1.96
StridentOnanist 1.94
ding69 1.93
drepachi77 1.92
mucker 1.90
RE: A landmark achievement for 20 forum members - admin. - 30-08-2010 10:21
Here is a list of the lowest 50 thanks to thanked ratio (only members with 125 posts or more are included):
docutech 0.0225
dev1984 0.0217
lazercutgold 0.0203
bairy 0.0189
WellHeeled 0.0180
derek purcell28 0.0169
Ellis_Dee 0.0136
tvxmole 0.0130
babestation 0.0126
moron50 0.0122
cmonthereds 0.0112
paulhuk 0.0112
HannahsPet 0.0100
Bulldog123 0.0093
cherrysexstation 0.0091
emmabutt 0.0074
babemagnet 0.0073
Big Boobies 0.0045
mrmann 0.0016
RichfetisH 0.0005
tara lee babestation 0.0000
masshypnosis 0.0000
mikeybhoy73 0.0000
bob664 0.0000
thestrange1 0.0000
suzii 0.0000
Kilam 0.0000
rhodes 0.0000
gyalis_star 0.0000
abbitaylor 0.0000
LynseyAtkinson 0.0000
Rod Crupe 0.0000
wildfowler 0.0000
ARENDALL 0.0000
Michelle Moist 0.0000
jay0987 0.0000
SwedishCamilla 0.0000
dibs2k9 0.0000
jade-victoria 0.0000
gingerbloke 0.0000
apmaddogg 0.0000
Bosse 0.0000
BBLackey 0.0000
sasha 0.0000
alexandra louise 0.0000
Fidster69 0.0000
Leg Love 0.0000
OliQueen 0.0000
STEVEY 0.0000
matt38 0.0000
RE: A landmark achievement for 20 forum members - Dan Volatile - 30-08-2010 11:32
(30-08-2010 10:05 )admin Wrote: I'm not sure that this information's useful, but it was requested and it's a bank holiday too, so why not?
Here is a list of the top 100 thanks to thanked ratio (only members with 125 posts or more are included):
Thanks admin.
I'm off to thank all of old git's posts just so I can knock him off the top of the table.
RE: A landmark achievement for 20 forum members - Dan Volatile - 30-08-2010 11:47
(30-08-2010 10:21 )admin Wrote: Here is a list of the lowest 50 thanks to thanked ratio (only members with 125 posts or more are included):
Someone once requested a particular video which I then sent in. The requester couldn't be bothered to click a thanks. All I got was a whinge about how difficult it was to download. No surprise to see him on the list.
RE: A landmark achievement for 20 forum members - Charlemagne - 30-08-2010 12:04
(30-08-2010 10:21 )admin Wrote: Here is a list of the lowest 50 thanks to thanked ratio (only members with 125 posts or more are included):
As more than 50% on the list are babes or site reps
It looks like the professionals don't think that they have to thank the forum members.