+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Show Formats & Content (/forumdisplay.php?fid=412)
+---- Thread: A Cellcast/Babechannel porn mag? (/showthread.php?tid=2759)
Pages: 1 2
RE: A Cellcast/Babechannel porn mag? - dondoe returns - 12-01-2009 20:58
The Lads mag market is too crowded as it is....
RE: A Cellcast/Babechannel porn mag? - vostok 1 - 12-01-2009 22:39
chrislatimer Wrote:vostok 1 Wrote:In the consultation that the “Babeshow” trade body had with OFCOM last year, one of the main points that was brought up was that the “Babeshows” should be allowed to continue unrestricted because many of their viewers are housebound and therefore unable to go out and purchase pornography.
They also stated that many of the viewers are “disabled” and unable to reach the top shelf to buy the standard Porn Mags....
So they do care about their viewers after all!!!
is that for real
Yep. It is for real.
That is what the Trade body that represents the Babe channels told OFCOM.
PDF Document:http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/participation2/responses/withheld7.pdf
From that PDF:
The current (BABE CHANNELS) situation favours the disabled, who may have restricted access to high-street
top-self magazines and sex-shops, combined with low incomes. It also favours the
unemployed and people on low incomes, who can “surf” 19 free-to-air channels at zero
cost until the find a programme that they like.
Perhaps this is why certain posters say things like "U are all losers with dead end jobs..."
RE: A Cellcast/Babechannel porn mag? - G@Z! - 12-01-2009 23:01
what ofcom has lost the plot but made the right decision
