Sky - Newscorp Takeover - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Sky - Newscorp Takeover (/showthread.php?tid=28469) Pages: 1 2 |
RE: Sky - Newscorp Takeover - mrmann - 14-01-2011 11:36 RE: Sky - Newscorp Takeover - DanniPandemos - 18-01-2011 15:12 I don't see any problem with this at all. It seems to be that most people are basing their objections on the idea it will lead to Sky News becoming more like Fox News, but there's a long-standing legal requirement of impartiality from domestic broadcasters when it comes to news. I don't see how Murdoch simply owning more of Sky changes that. In any event, I wouldn't care if Sky News did go in that direction. It's owned by a private company and should be allowed to broadcast whatever it wants - a principle most of us would LOVE to see applied to our adult broadcasters. Leave the impartiality requirement to the BBC. RE: Sky - Newscorp Takeover - eccles - 24-01-2011 20:40 Cameron met Murdoch chief days after stripping Cable of power to rule on BSkyB bid Daily Mail 20/01/2011 Daily Mail Wrote:David Cameron visited News International chief Rebekah Brooks days after transferring responsibility for her boss's takeover bid for BSkyB, it was revealed today. RE: Sky - Newscorp Takeover - eccles - 24-01-2011 20:46 Cameron-Murdoch meeting will not affect BSkyB decision, says No 10 Spokesman says Jeremy Hunt will decide 'alone' whether to refer News Corp bid, after PM met James Murdoch at Christmas Guardian 24/01/11 (Jeremy Hunt, courtesy of the Guardian 19/01/11) Guardian Wrote:Downing Street today insisted any Christmas meeting between David Cameron and James Murdoch would have no impact on the government's handling of News Corp's bid to take full control of BSkyB. RE: Sky - Newscorp Takeover - StanTheMan - 24-01-2011 22:35 I'm obvioulsy missing something here. What does any of this have to do with the babeshows? RE: Sky - Newscorp Takeover - eccles - 24-01-2011 23:51 Sky effectively own the satellites the babe shows are delivered on. At present Sky is a publically listed company and legally required to maximise shareholder returns. That can include broadcasting shows the directors dislike, and they may be more (or less) open to hosting successful channels from other broadcasters. Knowing who the landlord is might interest some people. RE: Sky - Newscorp Takeover - DanniPandemos - 25-01-2011 11:47 Who the landlord is isn't really important when it comes to Sky. Ofcom require them to operate an open platform and provide carriage to any broadcaster that meets the relevant technical and regulatory requirements and which can secure an EPG slot. RE: Sky - Newscorp Takeover - eccles - 25-01-2011 22:24 (25-01-2011 11:47 )DanniPandemos Wrote: Who the landlord is isn't really important when it comes to Sky. Not disagreeing with you but sceptical and would welcome a link to the regulations. And there seems to be a sting in the tail - "which can secure an EPG slot". Who controls that? It cant be a free for all as there is a finite number of channels. RE: Sky - Newscorp Takeover - DanniPandemos - 26-01-2011 13:51 Ofcom set out regulations governing the sale of EPG slots, in effect creating a market in which they can be freely traded between broadcasters. Sorry, I don't have a handy link for the open platform stuff. The open platform status came about because Ofcom rightly judged that allowing Sky to say which channels could use the platform wouldn't be a good thing. For example, Sky could have refused to broadcast ESPN if they operated a closed platform. Sky made great play of this openness a while back when they had a spat with closed-platform Virgin. RE: Sky - Newscorp Takeover - eccles - 27-01-2011 01:07 DanniPandemos you are right. Found Provision of Technical Platform Services - Guidelines and Explanatory Statement (21 Sept 2006) and the second paragraph states: "Broadcasters and operators of interactive TV services who wish to gain access to viewers using Sky’s digital set top boxes can purchase TPS and Sky is required to provide these services on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms." However there is still scope for subtle discrimination or encouragement, and Sky can excercise discretion over how many channels and the block size it considers reasonable for a market sector, such as Adult, Psychic, Gambling, Religion, International, News, etc. It could back that up with surveys showing high or low levels of interest. As long as it does not discriminate against a specific broadcaster it is in the clear. Westminster Council used a similar tactic in the 90s(?) when it declared that according to population size there was only justification for 4 licenced sex premises in the whole of Westminster, including Soho. In principle Sky could start encouraging raunchy Italial style shows, same as on Sky Italia, so it is not automatically bad. And they could have tighter impartiality controls or easier access imposed on them as part of the takeover conditions. What controls would you like imposed? |