+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Hotel Voyeur (/forumdisplay.php?fid=28)
+---- Thread: The worst channel? (/showthread.php?tid=3762)
RE: The worst channel? - OurJud - 06-02-2009 23:31
Dreamlander Wrote:Oh,and American pornos leave me limp!
Dreamlander
Me too! I couldn't get a hard-on watching American porn if my life depended on it, but that's precisely the point I'm making.
RE: The worst channel? - mikedafc - 07-02-2009 00:24
Other than at the weekend when the best girls are on it, yes it is pretty crap
RE: The worst channel? - Stevie - 07-02-2009 00:37
If you exclude the grandma channels, surely 960 has to be in with a shot!
RE: The worst channel? - Paddyfrank - 07-02-2009 01:13
While it may not be one of my favourites, it certainly grabs my attention if only for its individuality. The girls are generaly quite attractive and the editors/makers don't seem to be as obsessed with getting ppl to buy pics or text in at rediculious rates. I'm also glad to see the end of the 'receptionist', surely if your calling to speak to one of the girls the whole point, by nature of the programme, is to be able to see her?
Oh and it's the only channel with tammy!
Oh yeah and its the only time i've called a channel to listen in and the caller was a female...nice
RE: The worst channel? - oopnorth - 07-02-2009 02:29
OurJud Wrote:Fair enough, Dreamlander, but I judge a channel on explicitness, as this is what I want. As far as that area goes, they're never going to draw the attention of Ofcom, are they? When you watch the girls, it's almost as though they're on the phones to their mums rather than horny guys wanting phone sex. There's no aggresion. It's the equivalent of one of those softcore, soft focus American pornos... without the porn element.
I don't understand why people want to make all the channels the same, there must 10, 12 channels at least that provide what you like to see, surely there's enough channels for 1 or 2 to offer something a little different for those that don't want the aggression.
RE: The worst channel? - OurJud - 07-02-2009 02:39
Absolutey, oopnorth. I was just trying to establish where the channel came in popularity. And it's scored much higher than I imagined.
RE: The worst channel? - Stewartie - 07-02-2009 03:11
Dreamlander Wrote:I love it! Nearly all of the girls are natural.It has the best model interaction of any 900 channel and whenever the phone rings the girls seem to give it all they have got.They don't seem to have the resources of the other channels but I think they do their own thing and do it well.So to answer your question...No!
Dreamlander
Agree with you entirely. Its the only channel with a sense of fun. If you want to watch Lolly Badcock etc doing solo "performances" on Babecast so be it. Why does HV have so many callers while Lolly and others patently don't despite their 100 mph gyrations.
RE: The worst channel? - A Spider Monkey - 07-02-2009 16:53
I quite like Hotel Voyeur. Though I don't watch as much now that Lilly and Camilla have left they still have some good looking girls there.
RE: The worst channel? - cherryryder - 07-02-2009 16:55
Tammy is super hot it has to be said, she belongs on a better channel...
I do like the nipple licking that takes place in that hotel though...
RE: The worst channel? - jacko10 - 08-02-2009 01:53
ourjud when i said push boundries i meant the girls on hv are more likely to interact with each other, things like kiss with tongues and lick nipples things u dont tend to see on most 900 channels, sorry if the original post wasnt seen that way