+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More? (/showthread.php?tid=39921)
Pages: 1 2
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More? - rickhardo - 16-10-2011 10:45
If you can't actually see anything anyway I think a nice pair of knickers is far more attractive than an unsightly blur.
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More? - Scottishbloke - 16-10-2011 14:09
(16-10-2011 10:25 )mikedafc Wrote: No, have you never seen Japanese porn? it is terrible because they blur the private parts!!
Funny you should say that, about 11 years ago when I went on a trip to New Zealand with a large party of people we travelled by Japan Airlines, but to cut a long story short on the way back we stayed at a hotel in Tokyo nearby the airport for our flight back to the UK and somebody pressed the red button in the hotel room for what he thought would be hard core porno and yes it was, but only problem was all the private parts were indeed blurred, he had the embarrassment the following morning of having to foot the bill. True story this, I was there pissing myself laughing at his expense. No no blurring to me would be an even bigger step back than we have at present.
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More? - elgar1uk - 16-10-2011 16:07
(15-10-2011 21:28 )mrmann Wrote: so would it work for the babe channels?
It's probably just me that's a silly old fool, but how does blurring things out (pixellating) enable you to see them?
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More? - HoneyRocks - 16-10-2011 17:44
But if you blurred/pixilated the private parts on the tv feed only but showed in the clear on the webstream, could Ofcom do anything about the webstream being in the clear?
The wouldn't like it of course, but I guess as long as there was no touching, actual masterbation or simulation and the private parts sufficiently blurred there wouldn't be a problem.
Sexcetera and Sin Cities still regularly get shown on ordinary channels lower down with only blurring or less and never seem to have any complaints?
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More? - Chimpy - 16-10-2011 17:56
Did anyone spare a thought for the people who have OCD about cleaning? If they see a blur on the babe channels they may think its a smudge on the screen and then spend all night rubbing the screen off and not themselves....
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More? - rickhardo - 16-10-2011 18:03
I think Damon Albarn and his indie chums are probably too busy to stand about blocking glamour models naughty bits.
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More? - terence - 16-10-2011 18:19
(16-10-2011 10:25 )mikedafc Wrote: No, have you never seen Japanese porn? it is terrible because they blur the private parts!!
thank you Douglas MacArthur for that!
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More? - eccles - 17-10-2011 00:14
(16-10-2011 10:25 )mikedafc Wrote: No, have you never seen Japanese porn? it is terrible because they blur the private parts!!
I thought they only blurred pubes.
The rumour is that they make up for it by showing cum shots, bathroom, public fucking, group, squid and general weirdness. Or is that the Germans?
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More? - SCIROCCO - 17-10-2011 14:28
Please no. That would be a disaster, a victory for the censors and the last time I watched any channels.