+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: BABESTATION TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Thread: Is Babestation Too Soft? (/showthread.php?tid=44423)
Pages: 1 2
RE: Is Babestation Too Soft? - karld316 - 02-03-2012 11:53
it's softer than years ago but picked up recently.
RE: Is Babestation Too Soft? - vila - 02-03-2012 22:14
(02-03-2012 00:00 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: Not sure a channel change makes a massive difference to levels of performance.
It does when the change is from BS to RLC.
The standard of camerawork on RLC is lightyears ahead of the rubbish on BS, where the presentation is cluttered and claustrophobic compared with the relaxed, spacious impression generated at RLC. Plus RLC girls are allowed to do things banned at BS (e.g. bj/hj simulations).
RE: Is Babestation Too Soft? - Boomerangutangangbang - 02-03-2012 22:23
(02-03-2012 22:14 )vila Wrote: The standard of camerawork on RLC is lightyears ahead of the rubbish on BS, where the presentation is cluttered and claustrophobic compared with the relaxed, spacious impression generated at RLC. Plus RLC girls are allowed to do things banned at BS (e.g. bj/hj simulations).
Your right,not much scope for inventive camerawork on BS,the sets are no better than storm.Maybe worst,pretty much all bed sets.
RE: Is Babestation Too Soft? - Woiiii - 02-03-2012 23:35
No to the question.
RE: Is Babestation Too Soft? - outsider - 03-03-2012 14:15
some of BS girls are so soft!!!amanda rendall is the greatest!!!