The UK Babe Channels Forum
Fury v Wilder - Who Wins - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Forum: All Other Subjects (/forumdisplay.php?fid=114)
+---- Forum: Sports Zone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=77)
+----- Forum: Boxing (/forumdisplay.php?fid=268)
+----- Thread: Fury v Wilder - Who Wins (/showthread.php?tid=75441)

Pages: 1 2


RE: Fury v Qilder - Who Wins - HannahsPet - 02-12-2018 08:09

Only Winners the Promoters and the Bookies !!!


RE: Fury v Qilder - Who Wins - Carl-Gen X - 02-12-2018 10:15

How the hell did Fury get up from the second knockdown? Huh


RE: Fury v Qilder - Who Wins - Rake - 02-12-2018 10:30

(02-12-2018 06:46 )snookered Wrote:  And it's a split decision draw.
Rematch required.

One judge had it for Wilder by 4 Rolleyes
Another had it for Fury by 4 Rolleyes
How convenient the other judge had it even Rolleyesbladewave

You can't help but be cynical....


RE: Fury v Qilder - Who Wins - lovebabes56 - 02-12-2018 11:29

Shows you can't trust boxing judges any more - I'd say scrap any judge score that is even, and then the referee's score is final decision


Fury has said he is not interested in rematch only wants a shot at Joshua - which I don't think will happen unless he fights a quality opponent or tow, that satisfies Joshua's camp enough to give him a shot


RE: Fury v Qilder - Who Wins - lovebabes56 - 02-12-2018 11:34

(30-11-2018 19:14 )senor Wrote:  Qilder?

It was a typo sorry, - I meant Wilder and can't change it now

Mod Edit: I can. It's now Wilder - Charle


RE: Fury v Qilder - Who Wins - mikedafc - 02-12-2018 22:29

amazing that 1 judge has it 4 rounds to Wilder, another 4 rounds to Fury and the 3rd one have it level.

Having looked at the scorecards the judge who went for Fury had 114-112 on the scorecard and yet it was announced as 114-110


RE: Fury v Wilder - Who Wins - Bandwagon - 03-12-2018 19:19

And this is exactly the sort of shit that is driving people away from this sport. Blatant corrupt decision-making to suit the bookmakers and force a rematch for further pay-per-view sales.
What a laughable crock of shit.
I'm not particularly a fan of either fighter, but I am a fan of seeing the right decision.


RE: Fury v Wilder - Who Wins - schvall - 04-12-2018 02:35

(03-12-2018 19:19 )Bandwagon Wrote:  Blatant corrupt decision-making to suit the bookmakers and force a rematch for further pay-per-view sales.

But if Fury had won there would have been a rematch anyway.


RE: Fury v Wilder - Who Wins - Bandwagon - 04-12-2018 10:29

But it wouldn't hold the same level of interest IMO because as things stand both fighters remain undefeated.
Fury was clearly robbed, and we all know fighting an American in America for a title is risky especially on a points decision. So how is that so? After all, this is 2018 so why does such bullshit still stick?
Only one answer makes sense.... $money$
They can get fucked because I wont be parting with a single penny.


RE: Fury v Wilder - Who Wins - verybadroger - 04-12-2018 13:58

Fury won by at least two or three points. Shameful decision.