+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: BABESTATION TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Thread: The current standard of Babestation girls (/showthread.php?tid=80318)
RE: The current standard of Babestation girls - HannahsPet - 04-03-2020 06:10
Day girls almost as good as its ever been
Nights is Meh reminds me a bit like 2012 until about 2014 when a lot of the good girls were let go and replaced with lets be frank apart from Beth and a couple of others not so good replacements
mind you its not just BS S66 is the same
only xxpanded seem to be able to put a consistant lineup of girls who i would like to call and cam which is ironic as i wouldnt call there
RE: The current standard of Babestation girls - lovebabes56 - 04-03-2020 06:51
I think if you was to do a poll on xxpanded and maybe a defunct channel like RLC, I would not be surprised if the result of either was way better than any poll on S66 or BS put together.
However, I think BS have a far better daytime line up - than S66 when they ae having a bad day in their office - and the girls probably dress better too. i would agree with you KerrAvon, possibly any surgical enhancements do play a part. Cosmetic surgery does cost an arm and a leg for some, but it works if you get the right surgeon and the right advice. To be honest I think all of us can spot a bad boob or butt job on the babe channels a mile off.
RE: The current standard of Babestation girls - crocodoc42 - 04-03-2020 08:10
Probably more to do with the quality of the shows and sets rather than the talent, though that has dipped a bit for me. Bring back oil and roaming cam on TV for a start.
RE: The current standard of Babestation girls - HannahsPet - 04-03-2020 09:28
^^sorry but a girl should have you so captivated that you dont even notice the bad production or the sets. if your criticizing the set then the girl isnt up to scratch
RE: The current standard of Babestation girls - lovebabes56 - 04-03-2020 09:39
(04-03-2020 09:28 )HannahsPet Wrote: ^^sorry but a girl should have you so captivated that you dont even notice the bad production or the sets. if your criticizing the set then the girl isnt up to scratch
was tou referring to me?
RE: The current standard of Babestation girls - Glenn Miller - 04-03-2020 11:36
(03-03-2020 13:46 )The Silent Majority Wrote: It's all subjective.
Opinions may be subjective, but that doesn't mean they're of no value. In fact opinions are more sought after these days than ever before.
It seems like every time I buy something these days I quickly get a 'how did we do' message from the seller, asking me to rate their service.
RE: The current standard of Babestation girls - Dave_A - 04-03-2020 11:54
Seeing as we are talking about the current standard of the BS girls, and not the standard of the current BS shows, or comparing them with other channels, then for me they are about the same.
Quite a few of the current BS girls have been on BS shows for years, or have returned to BS after leaving.
Caty Cole
Alice Goodwin
Priya
Ashley Emma
Lori Buckby
Tori Lee
Sophie Hart
Lynda Leigh
Beth
Nicole Snow
Jess West
These girls i have mentioned above, and probably more that i have forgot,, have been on BS for quite a few years now, some have been the main stay girls of BS for years
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then there is :
Bella Mendez
Atlanta
Scarlett Jones(if she is still at BS)
Aemelia Fox
Kiki Daniels
Imogen James
and others that have been on BS for a while now, but not as long as the others I've mentioned
So for me personally, i see very little difference in the standard of the current BS girls, compared to the Standard of BS girls going back a few years or so, based around the fact that they are mostly the same girls .
RE: The current standard of Babestation girls - Kingsmind - 04-03-2020 12:36
Think Imogen has only been on BS for 2 years so it's not years and years yet correct me if i am wrong but it's a good point you made Dave.
RE: The current standard of Babestation girls - The Silent Majority - 04-03-2020 12:45
(04-03-2020 11:36 )Glenn Miller Wrote:(03-03-2020 13:46 )The Silent Majority Wrote: It's all subjective.
Opinions may be subjective, but that doesn't mean they're of no value.
I didn't say they were of no value. If I thought that I wouldn't have bothered voting.
RE: The current standard of Babestation girls - The Silent Majority - 04-03-2020 12:51
(04-03-2020 05:24 )KerrAvon Wrote: I'm not anti-tattoo but way too many especially over tatted girls.
I have to admit tats don't bother me as much as they used to. But that might be more desensitisation rather than a change in taste.
It does get to the stage where it spoils the effect of nudity though. When it never really looks like they are naked.