(02-07-2019 23:30 )ShandyHand Wrote:  ^ Gigi's tweets today imply the "third party" (the company that runs 66?) have made an agreement with OF to take the 20% before she (and presumably this would apply to other babes on the 66 rosta too) gets earnings from OF. She states the two companies are on most friendly terms.

Like Babelover says it's hard to fathom how she could be so surprised by this now after all the argy bargy last October. She must have gotten the impression that, at the very least, the strictures didn't apply to her.

(02-07-2019 18:00 )SecretAgent Wrote:  She's tweeted she's on Babestation on Friday & Saturday afternoon

(03-07-2019 05:03 )babelover48 Wrote:  

(02-07-2019 23:30 )ShandyHand Wrote:  ^ Gigi's tweets today imply the "third party" (the company that runs 66?) have made an agreement with OF to take the 20% before she (and presumably this would apply to other babes on the 66 rosta too) gets earnings from OF. She states the two companies are on most friendly terms.

Like Babelover says it's hard to fathom how she could be so surprised by this now after all the argy bargy last October. She must have gotten the impression that, at the very least, the strictures didn't apply to her.

When you look back to the argy bgnedargy last October, I think S66 probably lost about say around 20% of their roster through that stand off. I know Gigi tweeted she was considering taking OF to court over this 20%. But I would say she would be far better off not doing so as surely if she signed that contractual agreement that allowed S66 to take 20% of her OF earnings, her argument wouldn't stand up in court, simply because she agreed to the contractual agreement when she joined, so she must have been aware of that when she signed up.

It might be a different ball game if she refused to sign that agreement, and St66 w!ere taking their 20% without her knowledge, so any court action would hinge on whether she refused to sign that OF agreement S66 drew up at the time when she joined them.