RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 11-07-2017 22:09
The new girl on meet the babes doesn't seem to understand the general idea of babeshows. She came on screen topless then put her bra on.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 11-07-2017 22:22
Two cameras, one per stream, at the moment:
![[Image: vlcsnap-2017-07-11-23h17m37s524.png]](https://s24.postimg.cc/3pf5814lx/vlcsnap-2017-07-11-23h17m37s524.png)
![[Image: vlcsnap-2017-07-11-23h17m48s049.png]](https://s13.postimg.cc/lp9vw1b1j/vlcsnap-2017-07-11-23h17m48s049.png)
Better than having the exact same output on two streams simultaneously, IMO.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 11-07-2017 22:30
Non nude POV is still mostly lame to see though
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 11-07-2017 22:34
^ I disagree, particularly when there's so little hand-panty these days, which means that naked POV often ends up being upper body most of the time. 
Lucy's roving cam POV was quite good, IMO, and the twin camera views made it even better.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Dan Volatile - 12-07-2017 00:55
(11-07-2017 22:34 )Censorship :-( Wrote: ^ I disagree, particularly when there's so little hand-panty these days, which means that naked POV often ends up being upper body most of the time. 
Lucy's roving cam POV was quite good, IMO, and the twin camera views made it even better. 
You've hit the nail on the head. The naked pov is pointless without the palm thong. The wobblicam only seems to go downstairs to let the freeloaders know that a pervecam is in operation.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Robot Devil - 12-07-2017 13:23
Anyone know if the recent 'trialists' are scheduled to appear again soon? Or are they one-hit wonders? I will say though - probably to the aggravation of some, which is fine - while it's good that BS are trying to bring some new faces in, I DO wish the quality could be higher. I mean, there was a new girl last night - unless I dreamed it - that wasn't unattractive but man she had a pretty savage set of 'bolt on's'.
How are there not more GLAMOUR types interested in this easy gig? If Alice Goodwin can do it, why not more?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 12-07-2017 13:28
Easy money to be made else where like cams and onlyfans
get the feeling if more newbies start that might mean a 2012 style cull on the way
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - masterjboy - 12-07-2017 16:12
I think a cull is desperately needed to wake up this channel before the damage is irreparable?
I think the whole set up needs chucking out & starting again.
In fact imo the whole production team needs to be replaced even more urgently than sorting this babes out?
With the right staff (who give a shit ) this channel could be great again?
Come on Babestation sort it out so BS will no longer mean bullshit to me?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - ryuken - 12-07-2017 18:25
With the lads mags and Page 3 pretty much no longer in existence, I'd love to see all those glamour models make the crossover to TV but Hannah'sPet is right, most are probably satisfied with doing cams, onlyfans & websites like MayContainGirl & OnlyTease.
Sixty6 magazine should at least be trying to get some of the models they use to do videos for Studio66.
I agree with masterjboy, ideally the BS production staff needs culling more than the presenters do, but l'd still love to see them freshen up their roster by bringing back Jessika Jinx and Roxy Rayban.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 12-07-2017 20:10
Is BS off-air at the moment?
|