+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 07-10-2012 01:47
The whole context thing is a smokescreen that allows those in power to have sexual content while banning others. Shakespear never had nudity in his plays, or even women, yet some modern productions do. Thry claim artistic context, but it is not authentic, was not what the author intended and is therefore redundant. Likewise orgy scenes in Wagners Ring cycle.
The other view is that whatever the intention, a horny 15 year old will find a 10 second nude segment a turn on, however genuine the intention. It might be a school sex education film or medical health show or a dramatic scene emphasising two peoples deep and abiding committment to each other, but the 15 year old will just get the horn and jerk off to it later.
The unwritten rule seems to be that a sex scene is acceptable if it is too short to jerk off too, or lacks close ups, but younger audiences are quite capable of remembering it later (and imagining more detail).
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 07-10-2012 02:10
Ironically when I was 15 eccles our media studies teacher whilst demonstrating the type of different media outputs, put on a porno in our classroom, that gave me the horn, I was rather slow in getting up off my seat at the end of the lesson, don't know why
Also our English teacher put on the video of 1984 too which has full frontal nudity in it, BTW one of the kids in the classroom asked the teacher afterwords if he could borrow the video so as he could further study it, Aye right
more like in his bedroom later on that night 
Also if you took Higher Art they used to bring in a nude model which they would refer to it as life drawing, no wonder so many took art class
A bit ironic then that programmes that are deemed suitable for adults which can easily be blocked unlike the rest of the channels are the ones that are in actual fact not even showing 15+ material. Fucking baffling, watered down rat's piss to a grown up audience, how fucking insulting
RE: Ofcom Discussion - orchid500 - 07-10-2012 20:02
If you needed further proof that we have gone backwards I have included a link to a Youtube clip from the Kenny Everett Video Show from the 80's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygC1tu911G4&feature=fvwrel
The Dire Straits - yes I said Dire Straits - segmant had topless women on roller skates. - You would be lucky to get roller skates these days!!!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Shawnwilson - 07-10-2012 22:00
(07-10-2012 20:02 )orchid500 Wrote: If you needed further proof that we have gone backwards I have included a link to a Youtube clip from the Kenny Everett Video Show from the 80's.but it was all done in the best possible taste!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygC1tu911G4&feature=fvwrel
The Dire Straits - yes I said Dire Straits - segmant had topless women on roller skates. - You would be lucky to get roller skates these days!!!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 07-10-2012 22:54
These days roller skates would be banned by Health & Safety.
To get away with a topless woman on prime time TV you need to be Lady Gaga advertising perfume. Its OK if its in an advert.
[split] BabestationX - Chat & Discussion - Grawth - 09-10-2012 22:44
On the subject of erections - in recent times on the Playboy / Adult Channel and TVX channels erections can be seen all over the place. Quite often you can even see them being wanked by the female performer. And it's not just a fleeting glimpse either - in the newer content it's clearly deliberately included for a fair length of time.
I have no idea whether the rules have changed, or the interpretation used by the channels has changed, or what, but it never used to be allowed and now it seems to be.
Conversely, a few years ago a lot of the channels used to show explicit shots of pussys being licked. It never appears in any new shows, and yet when the old shows are repeated then it is still shown (I'm particularly thinking Playboy Lesbian and GirlGirl channels). Surely either it's OK, in which case new shows should show it, or it isn't OK, in which case NO show should have it. But we are stuck in this half way house.
I have come to believe that there are actually NO hard and fast rules other than no penetration. The rest seems to be a combination of make-it-up-on-the-spot, what-we-can-get-away-with and who-is-running-the-fines-today!
Farce
RE: Ofcom Discussion - fedup1 - 11-10-2012 10:32
(06-10-2012 02:17 )babefinder Wrote: The whole lot is one BIG scam,its all about money for the channels and as long as they make enough they couldn't give a flying fuck how tame ofcoms rulles are.
Im pretty sure BS wouldnt make the same amount of money from say a camilla bsx naked show if she was flashing her pussy on tv for free like a few years back!
Meanwhile ofcom (whos main gimmick is saving the kids from fanny) allow some GREAT pussy shots on E4
This was just on tv..... http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xicj7m_nude-girl-learning-sports_fun
Now since ofcom are all about the kids....whats a child who woke up in the middle of the night more likely to watch....E4 or a 900 channel
SCAMMING OFCOM CUNTS!!!!
IF this showed her close up fanny shots with clit of labia showing i gaurantee it would have been pixellated out,,all we saw is a bit of pubic hair which i saw on ITV4 film Eyes Wide Shut for instance..When its penis they do show close up with detail so you can see it pulsing with heartbeat any fanny detail would sexistly be banned..
RE: Ofcom Discussion - fedup1 - 11-10-2012 11:07
ITV shows On The Buses episodes and the Film Holiday On The Buses at the beggining shows a womens top falling off..In the daytime the scene is cut yet when shown after 9pm the scene is shown..Now in real life this a PG rated film so why the cut?? Now on my day off a few months back at 4pm in afternoon Midsommer Murders was on and Barnaby was questioning someone at a live nude painting class..In the background a women was stood their naked with boobs in full view and fanny area with mild pubic hair...This was a prolonged shot for say 30 seconds at 4PM IN AFTERNOON !!!!!!
What i am getting at is its one law on one programme and different on another sort of contradiction in terms..Someone was on about spanking well CBBC kids shows have had spanking in and other shows etc yet spanking just for humour is banned on a late night show called babestation where it should be acceptable to see this..
These sex docus allow female genitals with lips pulled apart but late night fun programmes which cant be arsed listing again show explicit male genitals and clouded out female genitals..So they show female genitals at 8pm on embarrasing bodies but 11.50pm at night they get banned..
I want to say about 2 Labia minora slips on babestation but giving no detail on here but when i checked Broadcast Bulletin nowt was done about this..Channel 4-5 could show female genitals these past years but dont and i dont think anything would happen and no-one would complain...
In that clip that lad posted Nude Woman did you see other women laughing,they were not offended where they..So women not offended by naked women nor lesbians or straight males so why ban female genitals?? No one would complain if a docu showed clit or labia minora and even if they did the docu contained male genitals so its a balanced docu so fair game ..
I am seriously baffled as to why you show a man getting his head blow off,operation on kidneys,folk vomiting,violence,strong language,drug taking,dangerous stunts yet the female genatalia is banned..
I have emailed ofcom and written to ofcom with a self stamp addressed envelope asking for a full explanation to why anything can be shown on UK tv bar Female genitals,i am not insane but i have a right for a full,frank explanation..
The babestation is giving some blokes but mainly women who phone in relief,,someone to talk too its a service that could be saving the NHS money in therapy sessions..IF Babestaion has medical benefits then under oftwats rules they can show female genitals ,hows that for an argument then.
Sorry for long post.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - elroyticklestab - 11-10-2012 17:28
Somewhere in Ofcom there is a Harriet Harman wannabee who sees the 900 channels as disgusting. Last night's shows were pathetically tame so it is obviously the producers who are running scared of Ofcom as many of the models do hardcore, open leg or at least tasteful nude.
Now if they all got together and said "right lads, 11pm Friday 12th Oct, best models out and all bollock naked, across every channel and screw Ofcom, they can't sanction all of us"....
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 11-10-2012 18:33
what i dont get is why they get a fine for a split second flash of flesh, its not as if the model stands there for hours on end with her pussy in full view,
they should be allowed to at least show a model face and body on naked or from behind similar to what eurotic does, i dont think any one is hoping for legs apart finger fucking and dildo"s , we have the web and subscription channels for that, the amount of pressure it would take off the models and producers would be evident from the start, may be then the girls would start to enjoy what they do again , instead of practically shitting themselves every time they move position , surely this has to be a viable option for the channels to put forward to the powers that be, even if the shows started at lets say 11 or 12 ?